This work shows how tenets of agency theory can be linked with institutional analysis to improve their explanatory power in the context of an emerging country such as Brazil. This study assessed the authors’ propositions in a single-case analysis of a Brazilian multiple family firm. The results show that in the initial phase, characterized by less severe agency problems, the firm’s competitive advantage matured, supported by the strong presence of trust derived from an extended family structure. As the company grew in complexity, the informal monitoring mechanisms that characterize collectivist societies allowed agency problems to escalate.
Bartholomeusz, S., & Tanewski, G. A. ( 2006). The relationship between family firms and corporate governance . Journal of Small Business Management, 44, 245-267.
2.
Beck, T., & Levine, R. ( 2005). Legal institutions and financial development. In C. Menard & M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of new institutional economics (pp. 271-278). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
3.
Beekun, R.I., Stedham, Y., & Yamamura, J.H. (2003). Business ethics in Brazil and the U.S.: A comparative investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 267-279.
4.
Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. ( 2006). The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 73-96.
5.
Blanco-Mazagatos, V., De Quevedo-Puente, E., & Castrillo, L.A. (2007). The trade-off between financial resources and agency costs in the family business: An exploratory study. Family Business Review,20, 199-213.
6.
Bruton, G.D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. ( 2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 1-14.
7.
Chen, C.C., Peng, M.W., & Saparito, P.A. (2002). Individualism, collectivism, and opportunism: A cultural perspective on transaction cost economics. Journal of Management, 28, 567-583.
8.
Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., & Litz, R.A. ( 2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 335-354.
9.
Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., & Bergiel, E.B. ( 2009). An agency theoretic analysis of the professionalized family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 355-372.
10.
Daily, C.M., & Dollinger, M.J. (1992). An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review, 5, 117-136.
11.
Denis, D. ( 2001). Twenty-five years of corporate governance research . . . and counting. Review of Financial Economics, 10, 191-212.
12.
Dyer, W.G., Jr., & Handler, W. ( 1994). Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19, 71-83.
13.
Eisenhardt, K.M. ( 1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74.
14.
Falicov, C.J. ( 2001). The cultural meanings of money: The case of Latinos and Anglo-Americans. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 313-328.
15.
Fama, E.F., & Jensen, M.C. ( 1983a). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics, 26, 301-325.
16.
Fama, E.F., & Jensen, M.C. ( 1983b). Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law & Economics, 26, 327-349.
17.
Furubotn, E.G., & Richter, R. ( 2005) Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18.
Glaeser, E., & Shleifer, A. ( 2002). Legal origins. Quarterly Journal of Economics , 117, 1193-1229.
19.
Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Nuñez-Nickel, M., & Gutierrez, I. ( 2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 81-95.
20.
Gouveia, V.V., Albuquerque, F.J.B., Clémente, M., & Espinosa, P. ( 2002). Human values and social identities: A study in two collectivist cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 333-342.
21.
Greif, A. ( 1994). Cultural beliefs and the organization of society: A historical and theoretical reflection on collectivist and individualist societies. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 912-950.
22.
Greif, A. ( 2008). Coercion and exchange: How did markets evolve? (Working paper). Retrieved from Stanford University website: http://www.stanford.edu/~avner/Greif_Papers/2008%20Coercion%20and%20Exchange.%20How%20did%20Markets%20Evolve.pdf
23.
Greif, A. & Laitin, D. ( 2004). A Theory of endogenous institutional change. The American Political Science Review, 98(4), 14-48.
24.
Harrison, G., & McKinnon, J. ( 2007). National culture and management control. In T. Hopper, D. Northcott, & R. Scapens (Eds.), Issues in management accounting (pp. 93-116). Essex, England: Pearson Education.
25.
Hofstede, G. ( 1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Hofstede, G. ( 2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
Husted, B.W., & Allen, D.B. ( 2008). Toward a model of cross-cultural business ethics: The impact of individualism and collectivism on the ethical decision-making process . Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 293-305.
28.
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.F. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
29.
Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. ( 2000). Tunneling. American Economic Review, 90, 20-27.
30.
Karra, N., Tracey, P., & Phillips, N. ( 2006). Altruism and agency in the family firm: Exploring the role of family kinship and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 861-878.
31.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. ( 1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471-517.
32.
Lauterbach, B., & Vaninsky, A. ( 1999). Ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from Israel. Journal of Management and Governance,3, 189-201.
33.
Lester, R.H., & Canella, A.A. ( 2006). Interorganizational familiness: How family firms use interlocking directorates to build community-level social capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 755-776.
34.
Licht, A.N., Goldschmidt, C., & Schwartz, S.H. (2007). Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 659-688.
35.
Lubatkin, M.H., Schulze, W.S., Ling, Y., & Dino, R.N. ( 2005). The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family-managed firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 313-330.
36.
Moores, K., & Mula, J. ( 2000). The salience of market, bureaucratic, and clan controls in the management of family firm transitions: Some tentativeAustralian evidence. Family Business Review, 13, 91-106.
37.
Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D., & Yeung, B. ( 2005). Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth . Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 655-720.
38.
Morck, R., & Yeung, B. ( 2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 367-382.
39.
Motta, F.C.P., Alcadipani, R., & Bressler, R.R.B. (2001). Cultura Brasileira, Estrangeirismo e Segregação nas Organizações [Brazilian culture, foreignism and segregation in organizations]. In E. Davel & S. Vergara (Eds.), Gestão de Pessoas e Subjetividade [People management and subjectivity] (pp. 237-257). São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Atlas.
40.
North, D.C. ( 1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance . Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Patton, M.Q. ( 2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
43.
Pearson, V.M.S., & Stephan, W.G. ( 1998) Preferences for styles of negotiation: A comparison of Brazil and the U.S. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 67-83.
44.
Ritchie, J., Spencer, L., & O’Connor, W. (2003). Carrying out qualitative analysis. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social research students and researchers (pp. 219-262). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
45.
Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., & Dino, R.N. ( 2002) Altruism, agency, and the competitiveness of family firms . Managerial and Decision Economics, 23, 247-259.
46.
Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., & Dino, R.N. ( 2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms . Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 473-491.
47.
Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., Dino, R.N., & Buchholtz, A.K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99-116.
48.
Schwartz, S.H. ( 1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitçibasi , S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85-119). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
49.
Sharma, P., & Manikutty, S. ( 2005). Strategic divestments in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 293-311.
50.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. ( 1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737-783.
51.
Triandis, H.C. ( 1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts . Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
Triandis, H.C., McCusker, C., & Hui, C.H. ( 1990). Multi-method probes of individualism and collectivism . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006-1020.
54.
Wilkins, A.L., & Ouchi, W.G. ( 1983). Efficient cultures: Exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 468-481.
55.
Williamson, O.E. ( 1993). Opportunism and its critics. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14, 97-107.
56.
Yin, R.K. ( 1994). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
