It is assumed that over the generations family businesses inevitably face greater family complexity. The increasing family complexity can have repercussions for the family and the business. To counteract these negative effects of an increase in family complexity, it has been recommended that business families utilize conventional family and corporate governance methods. Pruning the family tree is an alternative method of handling family complexity. However, this alternative way has been largely ignored in research. This article explores the research question: Why and how do business families prune the family tree, thus simplifying the ownership, governance, and/or management structures of the family business? The research findings indicate that introducing simplicity by pruning can be a worthwhile path to family harmony and business performance and that there is no contradiction between pruning the family tree and governance of the family and the business.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aronoff, C.E. (1998). Megatrends in family business. Family Business Review, 11(3), 181-185.
2.
Barach, J.A. (1984). Is there a cure for the paralyzed family board ? Sloan Management Review, 26(1), 3-12.
3.
Beinhocker, E.D. (2006). The origin of wealth. Evolution, complexity, and the radical remaking of economics. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
4.
Braun, M., & Sharma, A. (2007). Should the CEO also be chair of the board? An empirical examination of family-controlled public firms. Family Business Review, 20(2), 111-126.
5.
Burlingham, B. (2005). Small giants. Companies that choose to be great instead of big. New York: Portfolio .
6.
Chetty, S. (1996). The case study method for research in small- and medium-sized firms. International Small Business Journal, 15(1), 73-86.
7.
Cohn, M. (1990). Splitting the business to unify the family. Family Business Magazine.
8.
Corbetta, G., & Montemerlo, D. (1999). Ownership, governance, and management issues in small and medium-size family businesses: A comparison of Italy and the United States. Family Business Review, 12(4), 361-374.
9.
Corbetta, G., & Salvato, C. (2004a). The board of directors in family firms: One size fits all? Family Business Review, 17(2), 119-134.
10.
Corbetta, G., & Salvato, C. (2004b). Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on "Comparing the agency costs of family and nonfamily firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence" Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Summer, 355-362.
11.
De Visscher, F.M., Aronoff, C.E., & Ward, J.L. (1995). Financing transitions: Managing capital and liquidity in the family business. Marietta, GA: Family Enterprise Publishers.
12.
Dyer, G.W. Jr. (2006). Examining the "family effect" on firm performance . Family Business Review, 19(4), 253-273.
13.
Dyer, W.G. Jr., & Sánchez, M. (1998). Current state of family business theory and practice as reflected in Family Business Review 1988-1997. Family Business Review, 11(4), 287-295.
14.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
15.
Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal , 50(1), 25-32.
16.
Gallo, M.A. (2006). Why do 100 year-old family businesses get so old?Family Business Advisor, XV(7), 4.
17.
Gersick, K., Davis, J., Hampton, M., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
18.
Gimeno Sandig, A.G., Labadie, G.J., Saris, W., & Mayordomo, X.M. (2006). Internal factors of family business performance: An integrated theoretical model. In P. Z. Poutziouris, K. X. Smyrnios, & S. B. Klein (Eds.), Handbook of research on family business (pp. 145-164). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
19.
Grisanti, D.A. (1982). The agony of selling out to relatives. Harvard Business Review, 60(6), 6-13.
20.
Hall, A., Nordqvist, M., & Melin, L. (2005). Qualitative research in family business studies: The usefulness of the interpretive approach. Paper presented at the FBN-Ifera World Academic Research Forum, EHSAL. Brussels.
21.
Labaki, R. (2007). Contribution à la connaissance des liens familiaux dans les entreprises familiales françaises cotées: renforcement versus atténuation . Bordeaux: Université Montesquieu-Bordeaux IV.
22.
LaChapelle, K., & Barnes, L.B. (1998). The trust catalyst in family-owned businesses . Family Business Review, 11(1), 1-17.
23.
Lansberg, I. (1999). Succeeding generations. Realizing the dream of families in business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
24.
Lievens, J. (2004). Governance in het familiebedrijf. Sleutel tot succes. Tielt: Lannoo.
25.
Martin, H.F. (2001). Is family governance an oxymoron? Family Business Review, 14(2), 91-96.
26.
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19(1), 73-87.
27.
Montemerlo, D. (2005). Family ownership: Boost or obstacle to growth?Paper presented at the FBNIfera World Academic Research Forum, EHSAL, Brussels .
28.
Morel, B., & Ramanujam, R. (1999). Through the looking glass of complexity: The dynamics of organizations as adaptative and evolving systems. Organization Science, 10(3), 278-293.
29.
Mühlebach, C. (2005). Familyness as a competitive advantage. Bern/Stuttgart/ Vienna: Haupt.
30.
Mustakallio, M., Autio, E., & Zahra, S.A. (2002). Relational and contractual governance in family firms: Effects on strategic decision making. Family Business Review, 15(3), 205-222.
31.
Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M., & Dino, R. (2003). Dispersion of ownership and agency in family firms . Academy of Management Journal, 46, 179-194.
32.
Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M., Dino, R., & Buchholtz, A.K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99- 116.
33.
Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20-24.
34.
Steier, L. (2001). Family firms, plural forms of governance, and the evolving role of trust. Family Business Review, 14(4), 353-367.
35.
Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not . Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633-642.
36.
Thibault, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37.
Van der Heyden, L., Blondel, C., & Carlock, R.S. (2005). Fair process: Striving for justice in family business . Family Business Review, 18(1), 1-21.
38.
Vilaseca, A. (2002). The shareholder role in the family business: Conflict of interests and objectives between nonemployed shareholders and top management team. Family Business Review, 15(4), 299-320.
39.
Ward, J. (1997). Growing the family business: Special challenges and best practices. Family Business Review, 10(4), 323-337.
40.
Ward, J. (2004). Perpetuating the family business. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
41.
Ward, J., & Dolan, C. (1998). Defining and describing family business ownership configurations. Family Business Review, 11(4), 305-310.
42.
Westhead, P., Howorth, C., & Cowling, M. (2002). Ownership and management issues in first generation and multi-generation family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14, 247-269.
