This article explores the processes through which family-controlled businesses (FCBs) access and recombine resources to match the evolving needs of their business activities. We do so by applying the conceptual lens offered by social capital to the comparative study of four FCBs active in traditional competitive arenas. Our data reveal that these firms' ability to create financial value over generations does not result from possession of some unique resource, nor from higher-level combinative capabilities; rather, these FCBs have systematically created value through their ability to renew and to reshape their social interactions within and outside the controlling family.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, P.S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
2.
Anderson, R.C., & Reeb, D.M. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1328.
3.
Baker, W. (1990). Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 589-625.
4.
Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage . Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
5.
Cabrera-Suarez, K., De Saa-Perez, P., & Garcia-Almeida, D. (2001). The succession process from a resource-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14, 37-47.
6.
Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29, 249-265.
7.
Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39.
8.
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital . American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
9.
Collins, J.C., & Porras, J.I. (1994). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
10.
Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 1155-1177.
11.
Durand, R., & Vargas, V. (2003). Ownership, organization, and private firms' efficient use of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 667-675.
12.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
13.
Fama, E.F., & Jensen, M.C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-326.
14.
Gersick, K.E., Davis, J.A., McCollom, M., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: HBS Press .
15.
Granovetter, M.S. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology . In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations (pp. 25-56). Boston, MA: HBS Press.
16.
Habbershon, T.G., & Williams, M.L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1-25.
17.
Jensen, M.C. (1994). Self-interest, altruism, incentives and agency theory. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7(2), 40-45.
18.
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
19.
Johnson, G., Whittington, R., & Melin, L. (2003). Guest editors' introduction to the special issue on micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity-based view. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 3-22.
20.
Kets de Vries, M.F.R., Carlock, R.S., & Florent-Treacy, E. (2007). Family business on the couch. A psychological perspective. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
21.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-519.
22.
March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
23.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2004). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
25.
Morck, R., Strangeland, D.A., & Yeung, B. (1998). Inherited wealth, corporate control and economic growth: The Canadian disease. NBER Working Paper 6814. Cambridge, MA.
26.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
27.
Orr, J. (1990). Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity. In D. Middleton & D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective remembering (pp. 169-189). London: Sage.
28.
Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.L., Dino, R.N., & Buchholtz, A.K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99-116.
29.
Sharma, P., Chrisman, J.J., & Chua, J.H. (1996). A review and annotated bibliography of family business studies. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30.
Sharma, P., & Irving, P.G. (2005). Four bases of family business successor commitment: Antecedents and consequences. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 13-33.
31.
Sirmon, D.G., & Hitt, M.A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 22, 339-358.
32.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
33.
Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
