This article addresses the issue of training next-generation family members once they have joined the management team in their family firm. The qualitative analysis of strategic planning processes of 18 Italian family firms shows that involving next-generation family members in the planning process benefits their developmental process. The findings indicate that this involvement provides the next generation with crucial tacit business knowledge and skills, facilitating interpersonal work relationships between incumbents and next-generation leaders and building credibility and legitimacy for the next generation. The comparative analysis of the cases allowed us to identify the five variables that seem to combine in explaining much of the observed differences in the amount and composition of benefits experienced in the 18 firms. Our findings extend current understanding of two understudied topics in family business: the postentryphase training of the next generation and strategic management in family firms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, F.A., Manners, G.E. Jr., Astrachan, J.H., & Mazzola, P. (2004). The importance of integrated goal setting: The application of cost-of-capital concepts to private firms. Family Business Review, 17(4), 287- 302.
2.
Alcorn, P.B. (1982). Success and survival in the family-owned firms . New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Andersson, T., Carlsen, J., & Getz, D. (2002). Family business goals in the tourism and hospitality sector: Case studies and cross-case analysis from Australia, Canada, and Sweden . Family Business Review, 15(2), 89-110.
4.
Armstrong, J.S. (1982). The value of formal planning for strategic decision: Review of empirical research. Strategic Management Journal , 3(3), 197-211.
5.
Aronoff, C.E., & Ward, J.L. (2001). Make change your family business tradition. Marietta: Family Enterprise Publishers.
6.
Astrachan, J.H., & Keyt, A.D. (2003). Commentary on: The transacting cognitions of non-family employees in the family business setting. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 553-558.
7.
Astrachan, J.H., & Kolenko, T.A. (1994). A neglected factor explaining family business success: Human resource practices. Family Business Review , 7(3), 251- 262.
8.
Barach, J.A., & Ganitsky, J.B. (1995). Successful succession in family business. Family Business Review, 8(2), 131-155.
9.
Barach, J.A., Ganitsky, J., Carson, J.A., & Doochin, B.A. (1988). Entry of the next generation: Strategic challenges for family business. Journal of Small Business Management , 26(2), 49-56.
10.
Barry, B. (1975). The development of organization structure in the family business. Harvard Business Review, 3, 42-60.
11.
Blumentritt, T. (2006). The relationship between boards and planning in family businesses. Family Business Review, 19(1), 65-72.
12.
Boyd, B.K. (1991). Strategic planning and financial performance: A meta analytic review. Journal of Management Studies, 28(4), 353-374.
13.
Brews, P., & Hunt, M.R. (1991). Learning to plan and planning to learn: Resolving the planning school/ learning school debate. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 889-913.
14.
Cabrera-Suárez, K.P., De Saa-Pérez, P., & García-Almeida, D. (2001). The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14(1), 36-43.
15.
Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., & Sharma, P. (1998). Important attributes of successors in family business: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 11(1), 19-34.
16.
Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., & Sharma, P. (2003). Current trends and future directions in family business management studies: Toward a theory of the family firm. Coleman Foundation White Paper Series.
17.
Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., & Steier, L. (2005). Sources and consequences of distinctive familiness: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 237-247.
18.
Churchill, N.C., & Hatten, K.J. (1987). Non-market-based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family business. American Journal of Small Business, 11(3), 51-64.
19.
Dyck, B., Mauws, M., Starke, F.A., & Mischke, G.A. (2002). Passing the baton-The importance of sequence, timing, techniques and communication in executive succession. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 143-162.
20.
Dyer, W.G. Jr. (1986). Cultural change in family firm: Anticipating and managing business and family transition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 4, 532-550.
22.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.
23.
Grant, R.M. (2003). Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: Evidence from the oil majors. Strategic Management Journal , 24, 491-517.
24.
Habbershon, T.G., & Astrachan, J.H. (1996). Research note: Perceptions are reality: How family meetings lead to collective action. Family Business Review, 10(1), 37-52.
Handler, W.C. (1989). Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family Business Review, 2(3), 257-276.
27.
Handler, W.C. (1990). Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next-generation family members. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(1), 37-51.
28.
Higgins, R.B., & Diffenbach J. (1985). The impact of strategic planning on stock prices . Journal of Business Strategy, 6(2), 64-72.
29.
Ketokivi, M., & Castañer, X. (2004). Strategic planning as an integrative device. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 337-365.
30.
Langley, A. (1988). The role of formal strategic planning. Long Range Planning, 21(3), 40-50.
31.
Lansberg, I. (1999). Succeeding generations: Realizing the dream of families in business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
32.
Lansberg, I., & Astrachan, J.H. (1994). Influence of family relationships on succession planning and training: The importance of mediating factors. Family Business Review, 7(1), 39-59.
33.
Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., & Steier, L.P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Summer, 305-328.
34.
Lee, T.W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
Litz, R.A., & Kleysen, R.F. (2001). Your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions: Toward a theory of family firm innovation with help from the Brubeck family. Family Business Review, 14(4), 335-351.
36.
Longenecker, J.G., & Schoen, J.E. (1975). An empirical investigation of pre-entry socialization of successors for leadership in family business-controlled business. Management perspective on organizational effectiveness. Presented at the Proceedings of the Southern Management Association Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
37.
Marchisio, G. (2006). Corporate entrepreneurship in family business. Doctoral dissertation. University of Pavia.
McCann, J.E. III, Leon-Guerrero, A.Y., & Haley, J.D. Jr. (2001). Strategic goals and practices of innovative family businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(1), 50-59.
40.
Miller, D. (1993). Some consequences of CEO succession. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 644-659.
41.
Miller, D., Steier, L., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2003). Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 513-551.
42.
Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Reconciling roles for planning, plans, planners. New York: Free Press.
43.
Morris, M.H., Williams, R.O., Allen, J.A., & Avila, R.A. (1997). Correlates of success in family business transitions . Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 385-401.
44.
Pettigrew, A. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change. Organization Science, 1(3), 267-292.
45.
Quinn, J.B. (1981). Formulating strategy one step at a time. Journal of Business Strategy, 1(3), 42-63.
46.
Reingenum, M. (1985). The effect of CEO succession on stockholder wealth . Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 46-60.
47.
Rigby, D. (2001). Management tools and techniques: A survey. California Management Review, 43(2), 139- 160.
48.
Sharma, P. (1997). Determinants of the satisfaction of the primary stakeholders with succession process in family firms. Doctoral dissertation . University of Calgary.
49.
Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1-30.
50.
Sharma, P., Chrisman, J.J., & Chua, J.H. (1997). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10(1), 1-36.
51.
Steier, L. (2001). Next generation entrepreneurs and succession: Modes and means of managing social capital. Family Business Review, 14(3), 259-276.
52.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54.
Szulanski, G., & Amin, K. (2001). Learning to make strategy: Balancing discipline and imagination. Long Range Planning, 34, 537-556.
55.
Ward, J.L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56.
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
Zahra, S., & Sharma, P. (2004). Family business research: A strategic reflection . Family Business Review, 17(4), 331-346.
