This article compares the family business, and its reciprocal institution, the business family, to a one-sided band known as the “Möbius strip.” After explaining the rationale for this comparison, the conceptualization is enriched and then enlarged to accommodate the diverse range of firms identifying themselves as family businesses. Next, a process model is presented to explain the emergence, existence, and decline of the familybusiness interface. The article concludes with a discussion of several research-related implications arising from this comparison.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Astrachan, J., Klein, S., & Smyrnios, K. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15, 45-58.
2.
Astrachan, J., & Kolenko, T. (1994). A neglected factor explaining family business success: Human resources practices. Family Business Review , 7, 251-262.
3.
Cadieux, L., Lorrain, J., & Hugron, P. (2002). Succession in women-owned family businesses: A case study. Family Business Review, 15, 7-3.
4.
Carsrud, A. (1994). Meanderings of a resurrected psychologist or, lessons learned in creating a family business program. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 19, 39-48.
5.
Chrisman, J., Chua, J., & Zahra, S. (2003). Creating wealth in family firms through managing resources: Comments and extensions. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 27, 359-365.
6.
Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 23, 19-39.
7.
Covin, T. (1994). Profiling preference for employment in family-owned firms. Family Business Review, 7, 287- 296.
8.
Davis, P., & Harveston, P. (1998). The influence of family on the family business succession process: A multigenerational perspective. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 22, 31-53.
9.
Donckels, R., & Fröhlich, E. (1991). Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS. Family Business Review, 4, 149-160.
10.
Donckels, R., & Lambrecht, J. (1999). Are family businesses really different? What we know from western European business research that could be applied to the reemergence of family-based enterprises in east central Europe. Family Business Review, 12, 171-191.
11.
Dreux, D. (1990). Financing family business: Alternatives to selling out or going public. Family Business Review, 3, 225-243.
12.
Dyer, W.G. (2003). The family: The missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 27, 401-416.
13.
Filbeck, G., & Lee, S. (2000). Financial management techniques in family businesses . Family Business Review, 13, 201-216.
14.
Gallo, M., & Sveen, J. (1991). Internationalizing the family business: Facilitating and retraining factors. Family Business Review, 4, 181-190.
15.
Handler, W. (1989). Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family Business Review, 2, 257-276.
16.
Holland, P., & Oliver, J. (1992). An empirical examination of the stages of development of a family business. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship , 4, 27-38.
17.
Kelly, L., Athanassiou, N., & Crittenden, W. (2000). Founder centrality and strategic behavior in the family-owned firm. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 25, 27-42.
18.
Klein, S. (2000). Family business in Germany: Significance and structure . Family Business Review, 13, 157- 181.
19.
Lansberg. I., & Astrachan, J. (1994). Influence of family relationships on succession planning and training: The importance of mediating factors. Family Business Review, 7, 39-59.
20.
Leach, P., Kenway-Smith, W., Hart, A.Morris, T., Ainsworth, J., Beterlsen, E., et al. (1990). Managing the family business in the UK: A Stoy Hayward survey in conjunction with the London Business School. London: Stoy Hayward.
21.
Littunen, H., & Hyrsky, K. (2000). The early entrepreneurial stage in Finnish family and nonfamily firms. Family Business Review, 13, 41-54.
22.
Litz, R. (1995). The family business: Toward definitional clarity . Family Business Review, 7, 71-81.
23.
Lyman, A. (1991). Customer service: Does family ownership make a difference? Family Business Review, 4, 303-324.
24.
Shanker, M., & Astrachan, J. (1996). Myths and realities: Family business contribution to the U.S. economy: A framework for assessing family business statistics . Family Business Review, 9, 107-124.
25.
Sharma, P., Chrisman, J., & Chua, J. (1997). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10, 1-35.
26.
Steier, L. (2001). Family firms, plural forms of governance, and the evolving role of trust. Family Business Review, 14, 353-367.
27.
Tan, W., & Fock, T. (2001). Coping with growth transitions: The case of Chinese family businesses in Singapore. Family Business Review, 14, 123-140.
28.
Ward, J. (1990). What is a family business? And how can we help ? Small Business Forum, 8, 63-71.
29.
Welsch, J. (1993). The impact of family ownership and involvement on the process of management succession. Family Business Review , 6, 31-54.
30.
Westhead, P., Cowling, M., & Storey, D. (1996). The management and performance of unquoted family companies in the United Kingdom. Working Paper 42. The University of Warwick, Center for Small and Medium Size Enterprises.
31.
Abbott, E.A. ([1884] 2006). Flatland: A romance of many dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Allen, F. (1994). Secret formula: How brilliant marketing and relentless salesmanship made Coca-Cola the best-known product in the world. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
33.
Alletzhauser, A.J. (1990). The house of Nomura: The inside story of the legendary Japanese dynasty. New York: Arcade Publishing.
34.
Argyris, M., & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
35.
Astrachan, J. (2003). Commentary on the special issue: The emergence of a field. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 567-572.
36.
Astrachan, J., Klein, S., & Smyrnios, K. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15, 45-58.
37.
Axelrod, R., & Cohen, M.D. (2000). Harnessing complexity: Organizational implications of a scientific frontier. New York: Basic Books.
38.
Barney, J. (2001). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39.
Beavers, W.R. (1982). Healthy, midrange, and severely dysfunctional families.In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family functioning, (pp. 45-66). New York: Guilford Press.
40.
Birley, S., Ng, D., & Godfrey, A. (1999). The family and the business. Long Range Planning, 32, 598-608.
41.
Booth, M. (2000). Health and wholeness from topology to laughter: Notes toward a theory of connectedness. Ecosystem Health, 6, 92-98.
42.
Borys, B., & Jemison, D. (1989). Hybrid arrangements in strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combination. Academy of Management Review, 14, 234-249.
43.
Boulding, K. (1956). General systems theory: The skeleton of a science . Management Science, 2, 197-207.
44.
Broehl, W. (1992). Cargill: Trading the world's grain. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
45.
Carsrud, A. (1994). Meanderings of a resurrected psychologist or, lessons learned in creating a family business program. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 19, 39-48.
46.
Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.
47.
Comte, A. (1983). The positive philosophy. In Auguste Comte and positivism: The essential writings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Cooper, A. (1978). Strategic management: New ventures and small businesses . In D. Schendel & C. Hofer (Eds.), Strategic management: A new view of business policy and planning (pp. 316-327). Boston, MA : Little, Brown and Company.
49.
Copi, I.M. (1986). Informal logic. New York: Macmillan Publishers.
50.
Daft, R., & Lewin, A. (1990). Can organization studies being to break out of the normal science straitjacket? An editorial essay. Organization Science, 1, 1-9.
51.
Danesi, M. (2004). Poetic logic: The role of metaphor in thought, language and culture. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
52.
Faith, N. (2006). The Bronfmans: The rise and fall of the house of Seagram. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.
53.
Falletta, N. (1983). The paradoxicon: A collection of contradictory challenges, problematical puzzles, and impossible illustrations. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
54.
Gartner, W. (1993). Words lead to deeds: Toward an organizational emergence vocabulary. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 231-239.
55.
Gibson C. B., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M.E. (2001). Metaphors and meaning: An intercultural analysis of the concept of teamwork. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 274-303.
56.
Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2005). Organizational DNA for strategic innovation. California Management Review, 47, 47-76.
57.
Greenhaus, J., & Powell, G. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 72-92.
58.
Habbershon, T., & Williams, M. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1-25.
59.
Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture's consequence: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
60.
Hoy, F., & Verser, T. (1994). Emerging business, emerging field: Entrepreneurship and the family firm. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice , 19, 9-23.
61.
Hunt, S.D., & Menon, A. (1995). Metaphors and competitive advantage: Evaluating the use of metaphors in theories of competitive strategy. Journal of Business Research, 33, 81-90.
62.
Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Chandler Publishing Company.
63.
Keller, K.L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57, 1-22.
64.
Lacey, R. (1986). Ford: The men and the machine. New York: Little, Brown & Co.
65.
Lansberg, I., Perrow, E., & Rogolsky, S. (1988). Family business as an emerging field. Family Business Review, 1, 1-8.
66.
Lee, K.S., Lim G.H., & Lim W.S. (2003). Family business succession: Appropriation risk and choice of successor. Academy of Management Review, 28, 657- 666.
67.
Litz, R. (1995). The family business: Toward definitional clarity . Family Business Review, 7, 71-81.
68.
May, R. (1991). The cry for myth. NewYork: Delta Books/ Dell Publishing.
69.
Meek, C., Woodworth, W., & Dyer, G. (1988). Managing by the numbers: Absentee owners and the decline of American industry. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
70.
Miller, D., and Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
71.
Miller, R. (1986). The house of Getty. New York : Henry Holt & Co.
72.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
73.
Mitchell, S. (2006). Big-box swindle: The true cost of mega-retailers and the fight for America's independent businesses. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
74.
Moores, K. (2005). Personal communication.
75.
Morgan, G. (1987). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
76.
Nicholson, L., & Anderson, A. (2005). News and nuances of the entrepreneurial myth and metaphor: Linguistic games in entrepreneurial sense-making and sense-giving . Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 29, 153-172.
77.
Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(Summer Special Issue), 187-206.
78.
Odifreddi, P. (2000). The mathematical century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
79.
Pickover, C. (2006). The Möbius strip. New York : Thunder's Mouth Press.
80.
Porter, M.E., & McGahan, A.M. (1997). How much does industry matter, really?Strategic Management Journal, 18(Special Issue), 15-30.
81.
Reay, T., & Hinings, C.R. (2007). Multiple logics and strategic approach: Family firms in the Canadian wine industry. Paper presented at Family Enterprise Research Conference. Unpublished manuscript. Monterrey, Mexico.
82.
Read, J. (1957). Through alchemy to chemistry: A procession of ideas and personalities. London: G. Bell and Sons, Ltd.
83.
Lexico Publishing Group. (2005). Roget's new millennium Tm thesaurus (1st ed.). Long Beach, CA: Lexico Publishing Group, LLC.
84.
Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
85.
Sabri, S. (2001). The house of Saud in commerce. New Dehli: I.S. Publications.
86.
Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., & Dino, R.N. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 179-194.
87.
Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies. Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17, 1-36.
88.
Sharma, P., Chua, J., & Chrisman, J. (2003). Succession and nonsuccession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with nonfamily managers. Family Business Review, 16, 89-107.
89.
Sharma, P., Hoy, F., Astrachan, J., & Koiranen, M. (2007). The practice-driven evolution of family business education. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1012-1021.
90.
Sharma, P. & Irving, P.G. (2005). Four bases of family business successor commitment: Antecedents and consequences. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 13-33.
91.
Sonnenfeld, J. (1988). The hero's farewell: What happens when CEOs retire?New York: Oxford University Press .
92.
Stryker, S., & Statham. A. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), New handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
93.
Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J. (1996). Bivalent attitudes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9, 199-208.
94.
Ucbasaran, D., Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Westhead, P. (2003). Entrepreneurial founder teams: Factors associated with member entry and exit. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 28, 107-128.
95.
Usher, R., & Bryant, I. (1989). Adult education as theory, practice and research . London: Routledge.
96.
Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems . Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
97.
Whiteside, M., & Brown, F. (1991). Drawbacks of a dual systems approach to family firms: Can we expand our thinking? Family Business Review , 4, 383-396.
98.
Zahra, S., & Sharma, P. (2004). Family business research: A strategic reflection . Family Business Review, 17, 331-346.
99.
Ziegler, P. (1988). The sixth great power: A history of one of the greatest of all banking families, the house of Barings, 1762-1929. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
