Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2003-09
Management Capabilities and Environmental Characteristics in the Critical Operational Phase of Entrepreneurship—A Comparison of Finnish Family and Nonfamily Firms
This study seeks to clarify which factors associated with the start-up and critical operational phase of family and nonfamily firms influence the ability of those firms to survive over the critical first three years of their existence. In search of potential differences in the structural characteristics between these two types of firms, this study compares owners of Finnish family and nonfamily businesses in motives for founding the firm, characteristics of the local environment, changes in strategic factors, changes in networks, and differences in style of management. The findings revealed marked differences in individuals’ motives for founding a business: for family business owners, the presence of negative situational factors were the more important motivating and precipitating factors in creating a new business. With respect to style of management, in a typical family enterprise, ownership, management, and family are combined in a single entity. In the surviving nonfamily firms, entrepreneurial teams were found to be important in bringing the skills needed for the strategy-development process. Finally, family firms were most commonly located in the capital area, although some were also found in rural areas, whereas nonfamily firms were most commonly found in service center regions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almus, M., & Nerlinger, E.A. (1999). Growth of new technology-based firms: Which factors matter? Small Business Economics, 13(2), 141-154.
2.
Armstrong, H., & Taylor, J. ( 1985). Regional economics and policy. Oxford : Philip Allen Publishers.
3.
Barnes, L.B., & Hershon, S.A. ( 1976). Transferring power in the family business. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 105-114.
4.
Beckhard, R., & Dyer, W.G., Jr. (1983). SMR forum: Managing change in the family firm-Issues and strategies. Sloan Management Review , 24(3), 60-61.
5.
Bird, B. ( 1989). Entrepreneurial behavior. Glenview, IL-London: Scott, Foresman and Co.
6.
Birley, S. ( 1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing. 1(1), 107-117.
7.
Borch, O.J., & Huse, M. ( 1993). Informal strategic networks and the board of directors . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), 23-36.
8.
Bork, D. ( 1986). Family business, risky business: How to make it work . New York: AMACOM.
9.
Brockhaus, R.H. ( 1994). Entrepreneurship and family business research: Comparisons, critique and lessons. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 19(1), 25-38.
10.
Bygrave, W.D., & Hofer, C.W. ( 1991). Theorizing about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 13-22.
11.
Cachon, J.C. ( 1990). A longitudinal investigation of entrepreneurial teams-Part one: Who is involved and what makes them succeed. In N. C. Churchill, W. D. Bygrave, J. A. Hornaday, D. F. Muzyka, K. H. Vesper, & W. E. Wetzel Jr. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 100-102). Wellesley, MA: Center for Entrepreneurial Studies, Babson College.
12.
Calton, J.M. ( 1993). What is at stake in the Stakeholder Model? In D. C. Ludwig (Ed.), Business and society in a changing world order. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press.
13.
Carland, J.W., Boulton, F., & Carland, J.A. ( 1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs for small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354-359.
14.
Carroll, A. ( 1993). Business and society. Business ethics, and stakeholder management. Dallas: South Western Publishing.
15.
Carroll, A. ( 1995). Stakeholder thinking in three models of management morality: A perspective with strategic implications. In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 47-44). Jyväskylä , Finland: LSR Publications.
16.
Chrisman, J.J., Bauerschmidt, A., & Hofer, C.W. ( 1998). The determinants of new venture performance: An extended model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1), 5-30.
17.
Church, R. ( 1996). The family firm in industrial capitalism: International perspectives on hypotheses and history. In C. E. Aronoff, J. H. Astrachan, & J. L. Ward (Eds.), Family business sourcebook II (p. 559). Marietta, GA: Business Owner Resources.
18.
Churchill, N.C., & Hatten, K.J. ( 1987). Non-market-based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family businesses. American Journal of Small Business, 11(3), 51-64.
19.
Connolly, G., & Jay, C. ( 1996). The private world of family business. Melbourne: Pitman.
20.
Cooper, A.C., & Dunkelberg, W.C. (1987). Old questions, new answers, and methodological issues. American Journal of Small Business , 11(3), 11-23.
21.
Cooper, A.C., & Gascon, F. ( 1992). Entrepreneurs, processes of founding, and new-firm performance . In D. Sexton & J. Kasarda (Eds.), The state of the art of entrepreneurship (pp. 301-340). Boston: PWS-Kent.
22.
Curran, J., Jarvis, R., Blackburn, R.A., & Black, S. ( 1993). Networks and small firms: Constructs, methodological strategies and some findings. International Small Business Journal, 11(2), 13-25.
23.
Das, T.K., & Teng, B.-S. ( 1997). Time and entrepreneurial risk behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(2), 69-88.
24.
Davidsson, P. ( 2000). Continued entrepreneurship: Ability, need and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth. In P. Westhead & M. Wright (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship (pp. 451-475). Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
25.
Davis, P. ( 1983). Realizing the potential of the family business. Organization Dynamics, Summer, 47-56.
26.
Donckels, R., & Fröchlich, E. (1991). Are family businesses really different? Family Business Review, 4(2), 149-160.
27.
Dubini, P., & Aldrich, H. ( 1991). Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(5), 305-313.
28.
Dunn, B., & Hughes, M. ( 1995). Themes and issues in the recognition of family businesses in the United Kingdom. Family Business Review, 8(4), 267-291.
29.
Dyer, W.G., Jr. ( 1986). Cultural change in family firms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
Ensley, M.D., Carland, J.W., Carland, J.C., Näsi, J.M., Näsi, S., & Banks, M. ( 1998). Entrepreneurial teams in high growth ventures: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2, 13-25.
31.
Ensley, M.E., & Banks, M.C. ( 1992). Raising questions about entrepreneurial teams. In M. Schnake (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 1992 Southern Management Association Meeting (pp. 438-440).
32.
Francis, B.C. ( 1993). Family business succession planning. Journal of Accountancy, August, 49-51.
Freeman, R.E. ( 1995). Stakeholder thinking: The state of the art. In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 35-46). Jyväskylä, Finland: LSR Publications.
35.
Gallo, M.A., & Sveen, J. ( 1991). Internationalizing the family business: Facilitating and restraining forces. Family Business Review, 4(2), 181-190.
36.
Gartner, W.B. ( 1985). A conceptual framework for describing new venture formation . Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696-706.
37.
Gibb, A. ( 1990). Small business in the UK, state of development, expectations and policy. Occasional papers No. 9094, Durham University Business School, Small Business Centre.
38.
Gilad, B., & Levine, P. ( 1986). A behaviour model of entrepreneurial supply. Journal of Small Business Management, 24(4), 45-51.
39.
Handler, W.C. ( 1994). Succession in family businesses: A review of the research . Family Business Review, 7(2), 133-157.
40.
Hoy, F., & Verser, T.G. ( 1994, Fall). Emerging business, emerging field: Entrepreneurship and the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 19(1), 9-23.
41.
Isaksen, A. ( 1996). Towards increased regional specialisation? The quantitative importance of new industrial spaces in Norway, 1970-1990. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 50(1), 113-123.
42.
Jaffee, D.T. ( 1991). Working with the ones you love. Emeryville, CA: Conari Press.
43.
Johannisson, B. ( 1985, Nov. 11-12). Management technology for entrepreneurship and change. Paper presented at the seminar Entrepreneur ‘85 at the Institute of Finnish Entrepreneurs, Dipoli Conference Center , Helsinki, Finland.
44.
Johannisson, B. ( 1990, Aug. 12-15). Building an entrepreneurial career in a mixed economy: Need for social and business ties in personal networks. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
45.
Johannisson, B. ( 1998). Personal networks in emerging knowledge-based firms: Spatial and functional patterns. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 10(4), 297-312.
46.
Johannisson, B., & Spilling, O. ( 1986). Lokal näringsutvikling: Entreprenörskap og nettverksstrategier i noen norske og svenske kommuner. In B. Johannisson & O. Spilling (Eds.), (pp. 32-50). Tromso: Universitetsbolaget AS.
47.
Koiranen, M. ( 2002). Over 100 years of age but still entrepreneurially active in business: Exploring the values and family characteristics of old Finnish family firms. Family Business Review, 15(3), 175-187.
48.
Koskinen, A. ( 1996). The tracks and arenas of a small business development. Helsinki:Helsinki School of Economics Publications. Krueger, N.F. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5-21.
49.
Krueger, N.F., & Brazeal, D.V. ( 1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneur . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 91-104.
50.
Krueger, N.F., & Carsrud, A.L. ( 1993) Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 5, 315-330.
Lehti, M. ( 1990). The formation of resource allocation strategy of the firm and the underlying performance-related mechanism. An empirical study of the Finnish consumer goods trade. Helsinki: The Helsinki School of Economics Publications.
53.
Littunen, H. ( 1992). The success of newly-established firms: Implementation of the study and review of start-up situations. Jyvaskyla :University of Jyväskylä, School of Business and Economics, Centre for Economic Research. 124
54.
Littunen, H. ( 2000). Networks and local environmental characteristics in the survival of new firms. Small Business Economics, 15(1), 59-71.
55.
Littunen, H. ( 2001). Birth and growth in new metal-based manufacturing and business service firms in Finland. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 8(4), 377-392.
56.
Littunen, H., & Hyrsky, K. ( 2000). The early entrepreneurial stage in Finnish family and nonfamily firms. Family Business Review, 13(1), 41-54.
57.
Littunen, H., Storhammar, E., & Nenonen, T. ( 1998). The survival of firms over the critical first 3 years and the local environment. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , 10(3), 189-202.
58.
Litz, R.A. ( 1995). The family business: Towards definitional clarity. Family Business Review, 8(2), 91-107.
59.
Low, M.B., & MacMillan, I.C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, 14(2), 139-161.
60.
Mason, C. ( 1989). Where are the successful small businesses? A geographical perspective. In P. Foley & H. Green (Eds.) Small business success (pp. 11-26). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
61.
Miller, N.J., McLeod, H., & Oh, K.Y. ( 2001). Managing family businesses in small communities. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(1), 73-87.
62.
Näsi, J. ( 1995). What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm. In. J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 19-32). Jyväskylä , Finland: LSR Publications.
63.
Norman, R. ( 1976). Creative management of firms. Lund , Sweden: Aldhus.
64.
Pahkinen, E., & Lehtonen, R. ( 1989). Otanta-asetelmat ja tilastollinen analyysi. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
65.
Pikkarainen, M. ( 1993). Aluetalouksien haasteet Suomessa 1990-luvulla. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto.
66.
Ray, D. ( 1993). Understanding the entrepreneur: Entrepreneurial attributes, experience and skills. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , 5(4), 345-357.
67.
Reynolds, P.D. ( 1992). Predicting new firm births: Interactions of organizational and human populations. In D. L. Sexton & J. D. Kasarda (Ed.), State of the art of entrepreneurship (pp. 268-297). Boston: MA: PWS-Kent Publishing Co.
68.
Reynolds, P.D. ( 1995). Who starts new firms? Linear Additive versus Interaction Based models. In W. Bygrave , B. Bird, S. Birley, N. Churchil, M. Hay, R. Keeley, & W. Wetzel (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research 1995 (pp. 32-46). Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Babson College.
69.
Rich, S.R., & Gumpert, D.E. ( 1985). How to write a winning business plan. Harward Business Review, 63(3), 156-166.
70.
Sandberg, W.R., & Hofer, C.W. ( 1987). Improving new venture performance: The role of strategy, industry structure, and the entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 5-28.
71.
Sapienza, H.J., & Grimm, C.M. ( 1997). Founder characteristics, start-up process, and strategy/ structure variables as predictors of shortline railroad performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(1), 5-24.
72.
Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. ( 1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C. Kent, L. Sexton, & K. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 72-90). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
73.
Smallbone, D., North, D., & Leigh, R. ( 1993). The growth and survival of mature manufacturing SMEs in the 1980s: An urban-rural comparison. In J. Curran & D. Storey (Eds.), Small firms in urban and rural areas (pp. 79-131). London: Routledge.
74.
Spilling, O. ( 1996). Regional variation of new firm formations: The Norwegian case. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 8(3), 217-243.
75.
Stern, M.H. ( 1986). Inside the family-held business. New York: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich.
76.
Stinchcombe, A.L. ( 1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Rand McNally, handbook of organizations (pp. 142-193). Chicago: Rand McNally.
77.
Storey, D. ( 1991). The birth rate of new firms-Does unemployment matter? A review of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 3, 167-178.
78.
Storey, D. ( 1994) Understanding the small business sector. London: Routledge.
79.
Storey, D., & Wynarczyk, P. ( 1996). The survival and nonsurvival of micro firms in the UK . Review of Industrial Organization, 11(2), 211-229.
80.
Storper, M. ( 1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2(3), 191-221.
81.
Timmons, J.A. ( 1976). Careful self-analysis and team assessment can aid entrepreneurs . Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec, 198-206.
82.
Vesper, K. ( 1992). New-venture ideas: Do not overlook the experience factor . In W. Sahlman & H. Stevenson (Ed.), The entrepreneurial venture (pp. 73-80). Boston: Harvard Business School Publications.
83.
Ward, J.L. ( 1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continued growth, profitability, and family leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
84.
Westhead, P., & Cowling, M. ( 1998). Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1), 31-56.
85.
Wortman, M.S. ( 1995). Critical issues in family business: An international perspective of practice and research. Proceedings of the 40th International Council for Small Business Conference, Sydney. Newcastle: University of Newcastle, NCP Printing.
