The World Wide Web and other new electronic technologies might soon become prime survey vehicles due to convenient, verifiable, low-cost delivery and return systems as well as easy access and feedback mechanisms. However, along with the benefits of this new technology come new experiences and lessons to be learned and shared by researchers. The authors created and posted a survey on the Web to examine the uses of the Web for political information. The purpose of the article, however, is not to report on the political survey’s findings but rather to address issues concerning online research, discuss the implications of an online environment for traditional survey techniques, share Web survey experiences from an ex post facto perspective, and present recommendations for future online research, specifically in the areas of Web survey design, sampling, data collection and responses, and publicity.
About one in four adults has access. (1996). 1996 National Omnibus Survey. University of Maryland Survey Research. [Online]. Available: http://www.bsos.umd.edu/src/
2.
American Internet User Survey. (1997). FIND/SVP: Emerging Technologies Research Group. [Online]. Available: http://www.etrg.findsvp.com/internet/findf.html [January 7]
3.
Anderson, S. E., & Gansneder, B. M. (1995). Using electronic mail surveys and computer-monitored data for studying computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 13, 34-47.
4.
Asher, H. (1995). Polling and the public: What every citizen should know (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
5.
Babbie, E. (1990) Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
6.
Bertot, J. C., & McClure, C. R. (1996). Electronic surveys: Methodological implications for using the World Wide Web to collect survey data. In S. Hardin (Ed.), Global complexity: Information, chaos, and control (pp. 173-192). Medford, MA: Information Today.
7.
Bimber, B. (1996). Government and Politics on the Net Project. University of California, Santa Barbara. [Online]. Available: http://www.polsci.ucsb.edu/%7Ebimber/research/
8.
Bimber, B. (1998). The Internet and political transformation: Populism, community and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31, 133-160
9.
Caruso, D. (1996, January 29). Technology. The New York Times, p.C3.
10.
Croal, N., & Stone, B. (1996, May 27). Cyberscope: More sites. Newsweek, p.10.
11.
December, J. (1996). Units of analysis for Internet communication. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 14-38.
12.
EOverview report indicates: Only 37 million currently online in U.S. (1998, July 8). Business Wire [news release].
13.
Ferguson, D. A. (1992). Channel repertoire in the presence of remote control devices, VCRs, and cable television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 36(1), 83-91.
14.
Florida is among fastest-growing Internet states: California leads in total number of Internet users. (1998, March 3). CommerceNet and Neilsen Research homepage. [Online]. Available: http://www.commerce.net/news/press/030398_1.html [October 29]
15.
45 million U.S. PCs access the Internet regularly. (1998, May). ZDMarket Intelligence homepage. [Online]. Available: http://www.zdintelligence.com/news/ [October 29]
16.
Fowler, F. J., Jr. (1993). Survey research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
GVU’s ninth WWW user survey. (1998). Georgia Institute of Technology’s Graphic, Visualization, and Usability Center. [Online]. Available: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user_surveys/survey-1998-04/
18.
GVU’s seventh WWW user survey. (1997). Georgia Institute of Technology’s Graphic, Visualization, and Usability Center. [Online]. Available: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user_surveys/survey_1997/
19.
Hafner, K., & Croal, N. (1996, March 4). Getting up to speed. Newsweek, pp. 46-47.
20.
Heeter, C., D’Allessio, D., Greenberg, B., & McVoy, D. D. (1988). Cableviewing behaviors: An electronic assessment. In C. Heeter & B. Greenberg (Eds.), Cableviewing (pp. 51-63). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
21.
Hoffman, D. L., Kalsbeek, W. D., & Novak, T. P. (1996a). Internet use in the United States: 1995 baseline estimates and preliminary market segments. [Online]. Available: http://www.2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/baseline/1995.internet.estimates.html
22.
Hoffman, D. L., Kalsbeek, W. D., & Novak, T. P. (1996b). Internet and Web use in the United States: Baselines for commercial development. [Online]. Available: http://www.2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/papers/Internet_demos_july9_1996.html
23.
James, M. L., Wotring, C. E., & Forrest, E. J. (1995). An exploratory study of the perceived benefits of electronic bulletin board use and their impact on other communication activities. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 39(1), 30-50.
24.
Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (1998). The Internet: Vehicle for engagement or a haven for the disaffected? In T. J. Johnson, C. E. Hays, & S. P. Hays (Eds.), Engaging the public: How the government and media can reinvigorate American democracy (pp. 123-135). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
25.
Kittleson, M. J. (1997). Determining effective follow-up on e-mail surveys. American Journal of Health Behavior, 21, 193-196.
26.
Latest Intelliquest survey reports 62 million American adults access Internet/online services. (1998, February 5). Intelliquest homepage. [Online]. Available: http://www.intelliquest.com/press/ [October 29]
27.
Lock, J. J. (1995). The Internet as a mass medium: The media enter the world of cyberspace. Feedback, 36(4), 7-10.
28.
Markus, M. L. (1990). Toward a “critical mass” theory of interactive media. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 194-218). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
McGarvey, J. (1996, January). Latest Net study: 9.5 million active surfers. Interactive Week, p.9.
30.
Morris, M., & Ogan, C. (1995). The Internet as mass medium. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 39-50.
31.
Neufeld, E. (1997, May 5). Where are audiences going?MediaWeek, pp. S22-S29.
32.
New media. (1996). The Media & Campaign ’96 (Briefing No. 4). New York: Media Studies Center.
33.
Newhagen, J. E., & Rafaeli, S. (1996). Why communication researchers should study the Internet: A dialogue. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 4-13.
34.
Penkoff, D. W., Colman, R. W., & Katzman, S. L. (1996, May). From paper-and-pencil to screen-and-keyboard: Toward a methodology for survey research on the Internet. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Chicago.
35.
Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication technology. New York: Free Press.
36.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1969). Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press.
37.
Slowdown of World Wide Web may lead to bigger “backbone.” (1996, November 8). St. Louis Post Dispatch, p.A8.
38.
Swoboda, W. J., Muhlberger, N., Weitkunat, R., & Schneeweib, S. (1997). Internet surveys by direct mailing. Social Science Computer Review, 15, 242-255.
39.
Taylor, C. (1997, July 5). Net use adds to decline in TV use: Radio stable. Billboard, p.85.
40.
Weinman, L. (1996). Designing Web graphics. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.
41.
What’s your daily dose? (1997, November). PC Magazine, p.9.
42.
Why Internet advertising. (1997, May 5). MediaWeek, pp. S8-S13.
43.
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (1991). Mass media research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
44.
Wu, W., & Weaver, D. (1997, Fall). Online democracy or online demagoguery: Public opinion “polls” on the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2, 71-86.
