Software Reviews : Econoland Software Developer: Michael C. Lovell,Economics Department,Wesleyan University,Middletown,CT 06457 Hard disk space required: About 2 MB;program size (compacted): 448 KB Ram size required: As small as 8 MB Version reviewed: 8.1 Effectiveness: Good User friendliness: Adequate,but needs improvement Documentation: Not available,a brief installation instruction is provided in a Microsoft Word file (35 KB) and in a generic text file (3 KB
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online December, 1998
Software Reviews : Econoland Software Developer: Michael C. Lovell,Economics Department,Wesleyan University,Middletown,CT 06457 Hard disk space required: About 2 MB;program size (compacted): 448 KB Ram size required: As small as 8 MB Version reviewed: 8.1 Effectiveness: Good User friendliness: Adequate,but needs improvement Documentation: Not available,a brief installation instruction is provided in a Microsoft Word file (35 KB) and in a generic text file (3 KB
Boskin, M.J. (1998). Some thoughts on teaching principles of macreconomics In W. B. Walstad & P. Saunders (Eds.), Teaching undergraduate economics: A handbook for instructors (pp. 21-29). New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
2.
Daniel, J.I. (1998, February 26-28). Computer-aided instruction on the World Wide Web: The third generation Working Paper No. 98-02, presented at The 34th Annual Meeting of the Missouri Valley Economic Association , Kansas City, MI.
3.
Garson, G.D. (1996). The political economy of on-line educationSocial Science Computer Review, 14(4), 394-409.
4.
Molner, A.R. (1997). Computers in education: A brief historyTechnological Horizons in Education Journal, 24(11), 63-68.
5.
Porter, T.S., & Riley, T.M. (1992). CAI in economics: What happened to the revolution?Journal of Economic Education, 23(4), 374-378.
6.
Suppes, P. (1980). Patrick Suppes In R. T. Taylor (Ed.), The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee (pp. 213-260). New York: Teachers College Press.
7.
Usip, E., & Bee, R. (1998). Economics: A discriminant analysis of students' perceptions of web-based learningSocial Science Computer Review, 16(1), 16-29.
