Aquilino, W.S. (1994). Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: A field experimentPublic Opinion Quarterly , 58, 210-240.
2.
Aquilino, W.S., & LoSciuto, L. (1990). Effects of interview mode on self-reported drug usePublic Opinion Quarterly, 54, 362-395.
3.
Booth-Kewley, S., Edwards, J.E., & Rosenfeld, P. (1992). Impression management, social desirability, and computer administration of attitude questionnaires: Does the computer make a difference?Journal of Applied Psychology , 77(4), 562-566.
4.
Bozionelos, N. (1996). Psychology of computer use: XXXIX. Prevalence of computer anxiety in British managers and professionalsPsychological Reports, 78 , 995-1002.
5.
Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computersJournal of Educational Computing Research , 12, 147-158.
6.
Dyck, J.L., & Smither, J.A. (1994). Age differences in computer anxiety: The role of computer experience, gender and educationJournal of Educational Computing Research, 10, 239-248.
7.
Groves, R.M., & Kahn, R.L. (1979). Surveys by telephone: A national comparison with personal interviewsNew York: Academic Press.
8.
Henson, R., Cannell, C.F. , & Roth, A. (1978). Effects of interview mode on reporting of moods, symptoms, and need for social approvalJournal of Social Psychology, 105, 123-129
9.
Herman, J.B. (1977). Mixed-mode data collection: Telephone and personal interviewingPublic Opinion Quarterly, 62, 399-404.
10.
Johnson, T.P., Hougland, J., & Clayton, R. (1989). Obtaining reports of sensitive behavior A comparison of telephone and face-to-face interviewsSocial Science Quarterly, 70, 174-193
11.
Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L.S. (1986). Response effects in the electronic surveyPublic Opinion Quarterly, 50 , 402-413.
12.
Kormendi, E. (1988). The quality of income information in telephone and face-to-face surveys In R. Groves, P. Biemer, L. Lyberg, J. Massey, W. Nichols, & J. Waksberg (Eds.), Telephone survey methodology (pp. 341-355). New York: Wiley .
13.
Skinner, H.A. , & Allen, B.A. (1983). Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug and tobacco useJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 51(2), 267-275
14.
Sykes, W., & Collins, M. (1988). Effects of mode of interview: Expenments in the U K In R. Groves, P. Biemer, L. Lyberg, J. Massey, W. Nichols, & J Waksberg (Eds ), Telephone survey methodology (pp. 301-320). New York: Wiley.
15.
Synodinos, N.E., Papacostas, C.S. , & Okimoto, G.M. (1994) Computer-administered versus paper-and-pencil surveys and the effect of sample selectionBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers , 26(4), 395-401.
16.
Watson, C.G., Manifold, V., Klett, W.G., Brown, J., Thomas, D., & Anderson, D. (1990) Comparability of computer- and booklet-administered Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventones among primarily chemically dependent patientsPsychological Assessment, 2(3), 276-280.