Current definitions of telecommunications access are antiquated and overly simplistic. They overlook technological alternatives, overlaps, and interdependencies as well as patterns of usage and the integration of usage into daily lives. Ethnographic observation of communication behavior can be used to construct social indicators of telecommunications access and usage that are based on theories about communication and behavior, not technologies.
Fox, K. ( 1974). Social indicators and social theory.New York: Wiley.
2.
Land, K.C. (1975). Theories, models, and indicators of social changeInternational Social Science Joumal, 27, 7-37.
3.
Mueller, M., & Schement, J. (1995). Universal service from the bottom up: A study of telephone penetration in Camden, New Jersey . Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University, Department of Communication.
4.
Perl, L. (1978). Economic and demographic determinants of residential demand for basic telephone service.Washington, DC : National Economic Research Associates.
5.
Perl, L. (1983). Residential demand fortelephone service, 1983 (report prepared for Central Service Organization of the Bell Operating CompaniesWashington, DC: National Economic Research Associates.
6.
Saunders R., & Wellenius, B. (1994). Telecommunications and economic development (2nded.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
