Software for analyzing qualitative data is emerging simultaneously with a resurgence of formal methods for qualitative analysis, giving contemporary sociologists unprecedented control over qualitative research projects. This article focuses on computer methods of text analysis and on software for building "logic models" that systematize interpretations of empirical data. Content analysis, network analysis, and image analysis are mentioned as additional growth areas in computer-assisted qualitative research. Keywords: qualitative sociology, text analysis, modeling.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abell, P.1987. The syntax of social life: The theory and method of comparative narratives. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Abbott, A.1992. From causes to events. Sociological Methods & Research20:428-55.
3.
Carley, K.M. In press. Textual analysis using maps. In P. Marsden (ed.), Sociological methodology.
4.
Corsaro, W., & Heise, D.1990. Event structure models from ethnographic data. In C. Clogg (ed.), Sociological methodology.
5.
Fararo, T.J.1989. The meaning of general theoretical sociology: Tradition and formahzation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Franzosi, R.1990. Computer-assisted coding of textual data: An application to semantic grammars. Sociological Methods & Research19:225-57.
7.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L.1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldme.
8.
Grimshaw, A. D., ed. 1982. Special issue devoted to sound-image records. Sociological Methods & Research11.
9.
Guttman, L.1959. A structural theory for intergroup beliefs and action . American Sociological Review24:318-28.
10.
Heise, D.R.1989. Modeling event structures. Journal of Mathematical Sociology14:139-69.
11.
—. 1990. Review of Ronald Burt, Structure: Network analysis system . Contemporary Sociology19:799-804.
Ragin, C.C.1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Ragin, C.C., Mayer, S.E., & Drass, K.A.1984. Assessing discrimination: A Boolean approach. American Sociological Review49:221-34.
16.
Robinson, W.S.1951. The logical structure of analytic induction. American Sociological Review16:812-18.
17.
Shye, S., ed. 1978. Theory construction and data analysis in the behavioral sciences: A volume in honor of Louis Guttman . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
—. 1985. Multiple scaling: The theory and application of partial order scalogram analysis. New York: Elsevier.
19.
Stone, P.J., Dunphy, D.C., Smith, M.S., & Ogilvie, D.M.1968. The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
Ethno, Version 2. Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Software, 2460 Kerper Blvd., Dubuque, IA 52001.
22.
Ethnograph. Qualis Research Associates. POB 3129, Littleton, co 80161.
23.
HyperResearch. Researchware, 20 Soren St., Randolph, MA 02368.
24.
Mannequin. HUMANCAD, 1800 Walt Whitman Rd., Melville, NY 11747.
25.
Microsoft Word. Microsoft Corp., One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052.
26.
Qca. Professor Kriss A. Drass, Department of Criminal Justice, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, 4505 Maryland Pkwy, Las Vegas, NV 89154.
27.
Structure Network Analysis System, Version 4.1. Research Program in Structural Analysis, Center for the Social Sciences, 420 West 118th St., 8th floor, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
28.
WordPerfect. WordPerfect Corp., 1555 N. Technology Way, Orem, UT 84057.
