A Reply to "Why Sociological Computing Gets No Respect"/ George H. Conklin

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blank, G. 1991. Why sociological computing gets no respect. Social Science Computer Review 9:593-611.

Conklin, G.H. 1976. Using the computer in introductory sociology: A solution to the "methodology problem." Teaching Sociology 4:83-95.

—. 1978a. Computer-assisted homework and teaching effectiveness: A case study from introductory sociology. Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Computers m the Undergraduate Curricula 1978 (pp. 168-79). Denver. University of Denver.

—. 1978b. The frustration of academic innovation: Can new teaching techniques survive in the academic marketplace? Teaching Sociology 5:125-40.

—. 1985. Introducing criminology students to the data and social facts of deviance : The development of CRIMFACT. Social Science Microcomputer Review 3:103-14.

—. 1986. The administrative evaluation of microcomputer-based instructional materials development: A case study. Proceedings of the 28th Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems Conference (pp. 122-24). Bellingham : Western Washington University.

—. 1988. Computer use and software development by sociologists. Current practice and future prospects. Social Science Computer Review 6:536-47.

Conklin, G.H. , & Robmson, I A. 1985. Introductory sociology's role as a service course. Teaching Sociology 13:46-60.

Davis, J.A. 1971. Elementary survey analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

10.

—. 1987. Social differences m contemporary America. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich .

11.

Hmze, K.E. 1987. Computing in sociology: Bringing back the balance . Social Science Microcomputer Review 6.439-51.

12.

Molnar, A.R. 1982. The search for new intellectual technologies. T.H.E. Journal (Sept.). 104-12.