Bardini, T., Horvath, A.T., & Lyman, P.1991. A social study of microcomputer technology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Cambridge, MA.
2.
Baruch, G.1981. Moral tales: Parents' stories of encounters with the health professions. Sociology of Health and Illness3.275-95.
3.
Dutton, W., Kovaric, P., & Stemfield, C 1985. Computing in the home: A research paradigm. Computers m the Social Sciences1:5-18.
4.
Dutton, W., Rogers, E., & Jun, S.-H.1987. Diffusion and social impact of personal computers . Communication Research14.219-50.
5.
Enckson, F., & Schultz, J.1981. When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In J. Green & C. Wallot (Eds.), Ethnography and language m educational settings. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6.
Ferrari, M., Klingzing, D.G., Paris, C.L., Morris, S.K., & Eyman, A.P.1985. Home computers: Implications for children and families . Marriage & Family Review8:41-58.
7.
Fischer, C.S.1985. Studying technology and social life. In M. Castells (Ed.), High technology, space, and society (pp. 284-300). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
Gubrium, J.F., & Holstem, J.A.1987. The private image: Experiential location and method in family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family49:773-86.
9.
Jensen, K.B. In press. One person, one computer: The social construction of the personal computer. In P. B. Andersen, B. Homqvist, & J F. Jensen (Eds.), The computer as medium. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
10.
Kling, R., & Iacono, S.1988. The mobilization of support for computerization. The role of computerization movementsSocial Problems35:226-43.
11.
Kramer, P.E., & Lehman, S.1990. Mismeasuring women: A critique of research on computer ability and avoidanceSigns16:158-72.
12.
Ku, L.1989. Does software need more copyright protection? Communications and the Law11(4): 3-24.
13.
Kvale, S.1989. To validate is to question In S Kvale (Ed.), Issues of validity in qualitative research (pp 73-92). Lund, Sweden Studentlitteratur, Ltd.
14.
Lindlof, T.R.1991. New communications media and the family: Practices, functions, and effects. In B. Dervm (Ed.), Progress m communication sciences (Vol. 10). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15.
Lmdlof, T. R. (Ed.). 1987. Natural audiences Qualitative research of media uses and effects. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16.
Lmdlof, T.R., & Grodm, D.1990. When media use can't be observed: Some problems and tactics of collaborative audience research. Journal of Communication40(4): 8-28.
17.
Lull, J. (Ed ). 1988. World families watch television. Newbury Park, CA. Sage.
18.
McCracken, G.1988Culture and consumption. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
19.
Morley, D.1986. Family television Domestic leisure and cultural power . London. Comedia.
20.
Murdock, G., Hartmann, P., & Gray, P.1988. Home computers: The social construction of a complex commodity . Paper presented at the meeting of the International Association for Mass Communication Research, Barcelona .
21.
Pfaffenberger, B.1988a. Fetishized objects and humanized nature: Towards an anthropology of technology. Man23:236-52.
22.
Pfaffenberger, B.1988b. The social meaning of the personal computer. Or, why the personal computer revolution was no revolution. Anthropological Quarterly61:39-47.
23.
Rogers, E.M.1985. The diffusion of home computers among households m Silicon Valley. Marriage & Family Review8:89-102.
24.
Sigman, S.J.1987. A perspective on social communication. Lexmgton, MA: Lexington Books.
25.
Silverman, D.1989. Six rules of qualitative research: A post-romantic argument . Symbolic Interaction12:215-30.
26.
Silverstone, R., Morley, D., Dahlberg, A., & Livingstone, S.1989. Families, technologies, and consumption: The household and information and communication technologies . Paper presented to the ESRC Programme on Information and Communication Technologies Conference, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, Umted Kingdom.
27.
Tinnell, C.S.1985. An ethnographic look at personal computers in the family settmg. Marriage & Family Review8:59-69.
28.
Turkle, S.1984. The second self: Computers and the human spirit . New York: Simon & Schuster .
29.
Turkle, S.1988. Computational reticence. Why women fear the intimate machine . In C. Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and women's voices. London. Routledge.
30.
Vitalari, N.P., & Venkatesh, A.1987. In-home computing and information services. Telecommunications Policy11:65-81.
31.
Weick, K.E.1971. Group processes, family processes, and problem solving . In J. Aldous, T. Condon, R. Hill, M. Straus, & I. Tallman (Eds.), Family problem solving. Hmsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
32.
Wetherell, M., & Potter, J.1988. Discourse analysis and the identification of mterpretative repertoires. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analyzing everyday explanation (pp. 168-83). London: Sage.
33.
Wmner, L.1980. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus109:121-36.