AllisonP. (1984). Event history analysis.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
2.
BongaartsJ. (1975). A method for the estimation of fecundability.Demography12: 645–59.
3.
BreslowN. (1974). Covariance analysis of censored survival data.Biometrics30: 89–99.
4.
CoxD. R. (1961). Tests of separate families of hypotheses.Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1 (105–23). Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
CoxD. R. (1962). Further results on tests of separate families of hypotheses.Journal of the Royal Statistical SocietyB24:406–24.
6.
CoxD. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B34:187–220.
7.
CoxD. R. (1975). Partial likelihood.Biometrika62: 269–76.
8.
CoxD. R., & OakesD. (1984). Analysis of survival data.New York: Chapman and Hall.
9.
ElberC., & RidderG. (1982). True and spurious duration dependence: The identifiability of the proportional hazards model.Review of Economic Studies49: 402–11.
10.
FlinnC., & HeckmanJ. (1982). Models for the analysis of labor force dynamics. In BassmanR., and RhodesG. (eds.) Advances in Econometrics, vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
11.
GoldsteinR., AndersonJ., AshA., CraigB., HarringtonD., & PaganoM. (1989). Survival analysis software on MS/PC-DOS computers,Journal of Applied Econometrics4: 393–414.
12.
HanA., & HausmanJ. (1986). Semiparametric estimation of duration and competing risks models.Department of Economics, MIT.
13.
HarrellF.Jr. (1988). Survey of microcomputer survival analysis software.Proceedings of the American Statistical Association.
14.
HeckmanJ., HotzV. J., & WalkerJ. (1985). New evidence on the timing and spacing of births.American Economic Review75: 179–84.
15.
HeckmanJ., & SingerB. (1984). The identifiability of the proportional hazards model.Review of Economic Studies51: 321–41.
16.
HeckmanJ., & SingerB. (1984). A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data.Econometrica52: 271–320.
17.
HeckmanJ., & SingerB. (1985). Social science duration analysis. In HeckmanJ., and SingerB. (eds.), Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data.New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HeckmanJ., & WalkerJ. (1987). Using goodness of fit tests and other criteria to choose among competing duration models. In Sociological Methodology 87, vol. 18, ed. Clifford Clogg, American Sociology Association.
19.
HougaardP. (1984). Life table methods for heterogeneous populations: Distributions describing the heterogeneity.Biometrika71.
20.
KalbfleischJ., & PrenticeR. (1980). The statistical analysis of failure time data.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
21.
KaplanE. L., & MeierP. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations.Journal of the American Statistical Association53: 457–81.
22.
KentJ. T. (1986). The underlying structure of nonnested hypothesis tests.Biometrika73: 333–43.
23.
KentJ. T., & O'QuigleyJ. (1988). Measures of dependence for censored survival data.Biometrika75(3):525–34.
24.
LancasterT. (1979). Econometric methods for the duration of unemployment.Econometrica47: 939–56.
25.
LancasterT. (1985). Generalized residuals and heterogeneous duration models: With applications to the Weibull model.Journal of Econometrics28: 155–69.
26.
LancasterT. (1990). Econometric analysis of transition data.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LawlessJ. F. (1982). Statistical models and methods for lifetime data.New York: Wiley.
28.
MantonK. G.S., StallardE. (1980). A stochastic compartment model representation of chronic disease dependence: Techniques for evaluating parameters of partially unobserved age in homogeneous stochastic processes.Theoretical Population Biology18: 57–75.
29.
MantonK. G., StallardE., & VaupelJ. (1986). Alternative models for the heterogeneity of mortality risks among the aged.Journal of the American Statistical Association81: 635–44.
30.
MeekerW. Q. (1990). Future directions in computing for survival analysis.Proceedings of the American Statistical Association.
31.
MeyerB. (1986). Semiparametric estimation of hazard models.Draft, Northwestern University.
32.
MeyerB. (1990). Unemployment insurance and unemployment spells.Econometrica58: 757–82.
33.
MoffittR. (1985). Unemployment insurance and the distribution of unemployment spells.Journal of Econometrics38: 85–101.
34.
NelsonW. (1990). Accelerated testing: Statistical models, test plans, and data analysis.
35.
PrenticeR. L., & GloecklerL. A. (1978). Regression analysis of grouped survival data with applications to breast cancer data.Biometrics34: 57–67.
36.
PrenticeR. L., & KalbfleischJ. D. (1979). Hazard rate models with covariates.Biometrics35: 25–39.
37.
RobbR. (1986). Nonparametric large-sample and small-sample tests for a declining hazard function.Journal of the American Statistical Association.
38.
SchemperM. (1990). The explained variation in proportional hazards regression.Biometrika77(1):216–18.
39.
SteinbergD., & CarsonR. (1989). Demand curve estimation via survival analysis. Presented at the Winter Conference, American Statistical Association, January, San Diego.
40.
SteinbergD., & CarsonR. (1990). Experimental design for discrete choice voter preference surveys.Proceedings of the American Statistical Association.
41.
SteinbergD., & MonforteF. (1987). Estimating the effects of job search assistance and training programs on the unemployment durations of displaced workers. In LangK., and LeonardJ. (eds.), Unemployment and the structure of labor markets.London: Basil Blackwell.
42.
SueyoshiG. (1987). Competing risks models of economic behavior: Theory and applications to retirement and unemployment.Department of Economics, MIT.
43.
TrussellJ., & RichardsT. (1985). Correcting for unobserved heterogeneity in hazard models: An application of the Heckman-Singer model to demographic data.Sociological Methodology, 242–76.
44.
TurnbullB. W.The empirical distribution function with arbitrarily grouped, censored and truncated data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B38:290–95.
45.
VaupelJ. W., MantonK. G., & StallardE. (1979). The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of morality.Demography16: 439–54.
46.
WilkinsonL. (1988). SYSTAT: The system for statistics.Evanston, IL: SYSTAT Inc.
47.
World Fertility Survey. (1984). Fertility survey in Sweden, 1981: A summary of findings. Report no. 43.
48.
YiK. M., HonoreB., & WalkerJ. (1987). CTM: A user's guide.Chicago: NORC.