Keeping Sense of Accounts Using Computer-Based Cognitive Maps

Abstract

This article describes the use of Cope, which is designed to hold knowledge encoded using the cognitive mapping techmque. Cognitive mapping is an attempt to operate Personal Construct psychology beyond the use of Repertory Grids. Cognitive maps have some similarities to modeling techmques used in political science, notably by Robert Axelrod and colleagues. Concepts (short phrases) are linked to form chains of argumentation, essentially explanations leading to consequences. Any concept can be linked to any other concept and the links can be directed. The software releases cognitive maps from many constraints of two-dimensional representation, allowing the researcher to manage complex, qualitative data more effectively. The modeling method and software are used to gather materials—observations, interview data, documentary data and so forth—together, to find areas of corroboration and difference between accounts of events and issues, to examine the coherence and adequacy of accounts and to promote enquiry into and understanding of the structure of accounts as modeled. Through the analytic and retrieval routines in the software, a model's contents can be sorted, explored, and presented in many ways in order to manage the richness and complexity of qualitative data. Principles and practices of model building and qualitative data analysis are illustrated throughout the article. Keywords: qualitative data, accounts, cognitive maps, software, complexity, analysis, storage, retrieval.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackermann, F. , Cook, J. , Cropper, S. , & Eden, C. (1989). Policy development in the home office prison department: An experiment Paper no. 5, University of Strathclyde, Department of Management Science, Glasgow.

Ackermann, F. , Eden, C. , & Cropper, S. (1990). Cognitive Mapping A user guide, workmg paper no. 14, Strathclyde University, Department of Management Science, Glasgow.

Axelrod, R. (1976). The structure of decision. The cognitive maps of political elites Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Bonanus, H. , Holland, R. , & Rosenberg, S. (1981). Personal construct psychology London : Macmillan.

Eden, C. (1980). Modelling cognition in complex decision problems Journal of Interdisciplinary Modelling and Simulation , 3 (2), 119-144.

Eden, C. (1988a). Strategic decision support through computer based analysis and presentation of cognitive maps Paper no. 1, University of Strathclyde, Department of Management Science, Glasgow.

Eden, C. (1988b). Cognitive mapping: A review European Journal of Operational Research, 36, 1-13.

Eden, C. forthcoming). Cognitive maps as a visionary tool: Strategy embedded in issue management, Long-Range Planning.

Eden, C. & Jones, S. (1984). Using repertory grids for problem construction Journal of the Operational Research Society , 35, 779-790.

10.

Eden, C. , Cropper, S. , & Tram, C. (1990, February). Performance and coherence: The strategy review process Paper presented at the Strategic Planning Society and the Operational Research Society, London.

11.

Eden, C. , Jones, S. , & Sims, D. (1979). Thinking in organizations, London: Macmillan.

12.

Fransella, K. , & Banmster, D. (1977). A manual for repertory grid technique London: Academic Press.

13.

Glaser, B.G. , & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory Chicago: Aldme.

14.

Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. , (1971). Status Passage, London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.

15.

Harary, F. , Norman, R. , & Cartright, D. (1965). Structured models An introduction to the theory of directed graphs New York: Wiley .

16.

Hewes, D.E. & Planalp, S. (1982). There is nothing as useful as a good theory ... : The influence of social knowledge on interpersonal communication In M. E. Roloff and C. R. Berger (Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 107-150). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

17.

Jones, S. (1977). Unpublished manuscript, University of Bath, Project Report, Bath, UK.

18.

Jones, S. (1985). The analysis of depth interviews In R. Walker (Ed.), Applied quantitative research (pp. 56-70). Aldershot : Gower.

19.

Kelley, H.H. (1971). Causal schemata and the process In E. E. Jones et al. (Eds.), Attribution. Perceiving the causes of behaviour. Morristown: General Leaming Press.

20.

Kelly, G.A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. A theory of personality, 2 vols New York: Norton.

21.

Kelly, G.A. (1963). A Theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs New York: Norton.

22.

McHugh, P. (1968). Defining the situation New York: Bobbs Merrill.

23.

Pepper, S.A. (1942). World hypotheses Berkeley: University of California Press.

24.

Smithin, T. (1983). Argument Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

25.

Wegner, D.M. & Vallacher, R.R. (1981). Common sense psychology In J. P. Forger (Ed.), Social Cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding (pp. 226-246). London: Academic Press.

26.

Wnghtson, M.T. (1976). The documentary coding method In R. Axelrod (Ed.), Structure of decision (pp. 291-332). Princeton: Princeton University Press.