A gender and race/ethnicity gap exists both m computer experience and computer attitudes. The fact that computer-related activities are seen as white and male may influence and discourage women and minorities from making an academic commitment to careers for which high-technology skills are essential. Through these societal perceptions of computers as white and male, and through related instructional biases in our schools, we may be creating a technological underclass. To understand these differences and to help to try to alleviate them, this study was designed to determine how individuals' attitudes toward computing differ, what roles computers play in their lives, and what issues negatively affect their participation and attitudes. A questionnaire was administered to students at a large public urban university. We found that (i) men have more computer experience, (2) men have more favorable attitudes toward computers—women had significantly less favorable attitude scores, (3) persons of different races or ethnicities have differing computer experience—whites had the most years of experience, Hispanics had the fewest years of experience; (4) attitudes toward computing differ by race and ethnicity Several implications for instruction are drawn from the results. Keywords computers, attitudes toward computing, race/ethnicity differences, gender differences, computing experience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association of University Women. ( 1985, April). Computer Education: Terminal Inequality? Graduate Woman, 79 (1), 5.
2.
Anderson, Edward A. (1985). Black high-school seniors' attitudes toward computers and selection of computer-related coursework and careers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco.
3.
Anderson, Ronald E. (1987). Females surpass males in computer problem solving: Findings from the Minnesota Computer Literacy Assessment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3 (1), 39-51.
4.
Anderson, Ronald E., Welch, Wayne W., & Harris, Linda J. (1984, April). Inequities in opportunities for computer literacy. The Computing Teacher, 10-12.
5.
Anderson, Ronald E., Klassen, D.L., Krohn, K.R., Smith-Cunnien, P. (1982). Assessing Computer Literacy. (Publication No. 503, St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium.
6.
Anderson, Ronald E., Klassen, Daniel L., Hansen, Thomas P , & Johnson, David C. (1981). The affective and cognitive effects of microcomputer based science instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 9 (4), 329-355.
7.
Arndt, Stephan. (1985). Students' attitudes toward computers. Computers and the Social Sciences, i.
8.
Banks, Martha E., & Ackerman, Rosalie J. (1989, March 18). Employment patterns for women m computer fields: Focus on women of colorPaper presented at Computing: Policy and Social Issues Conference, sponsored by the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI , Chattanooga, TN.
9.
Benderson, Albert. (1985). Beyond computer literacy. Focus 16, a publication of the Educational Testing Service, 1985.
10.
Breakwell, Glynis M., Fife-Schaw, Chris, & Lee Terence. (1985, December). Survey of student attitudes to technology. Science and Public Policy, 12(6), 337-340.
11.
Collins, Sharon M. (1983, April). The making of the black middle class. Social Problems, 30(4), 369-382.
12.
Collis, Betty. (1985). Psychosocial implications of sex differences in attitudes toward computers: Results of a survey. International Journal of Women's Studies, 8 (3), 207-213.
Dambrot, Faye H., Watkins-Malek, Michelle A., Silling, S. Marc, Marshall, Rodney S., & Garver, Jo Ann. (1985). Correlates of sex differences in attitudes toward and involvement with computers. Journal of Vocational Behavior27, 71-86.
15.
Epstein, Cynthia F. (1988). Deceptive distinctions Sex, gender, and the social order. New Haven: Yale University Press.
16.
Fact File: Earned Degrees Conferred, 1986-87. (Source: United States Department of Education.) (1989, September 27). Chronicle of Higher Education
17.
Fertsch, Danna E. (1985). Gender difference in computer attitudes among middle-school-age students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston.
18.
Fetler, Mark. (1985). Sex difference on the California statewide assessment of computer literacy. Sex Roles, 13 (3,4), 181-191.
19.
Fulton, Margaret A. (1983). The feminine computer: Impact of male versus female stereotyped linguistic output on attributing power to a computer. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
20.
Gilroy, Faith D. & Desai, Harsha B. (1986). Computer anxiety: Sex, race and age. International Journal or Man-Machine Studies , 25, 711-719.
21.
Goldstein, Harold & Fraser, Bryna Shore. (1985, June). Training for work in the computer age How workers who use computers get their training. Washington, DC: National Commission for Employment Policy. Research Report RR-85-09.
22.
Gutek, Barbara A. and Bikson, Tora K. (1985). Differential experiences of men and women in computerized offices. Sex Roles13 (3,4), 123-136.
23.
Harmon, Harry H. (1967). Modern factor analysis (2nd ed.) Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
24.
Hawkins, Jan. (1985). Computers and girls: Rethinking the issues. Sex Roles, 13 (3,4), 165-180.
25.
Heise, David R. (1965). Semantic differential profiles for 1,000 most frequent English words. Psychological Monographs. General and Applied, 79 (8), 1-31.
26.
Hess, Robert D., & Miura, Irene T. (1985). Gender differences in enrollment in computer camps and classes. Sex Roles, 13 (3,4), 193-202.
27.
Hubbard, Wanda M. (1986). An investigation of factors affecting male and female elementary students' free time use of computers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International University.
28.
Jones, Mary H. (1983). Sex difference in achievement on cognitive dimensions of computerhteracy and in attitudes toward computing and computers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia.
29.
Kaiser, Henry F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational Psychology Measurement, 20, 141-151.
30.
Kiesler, Sara, Sproull, Lee, & Eccles, Jacquelynne S. (1985). Poolhalls, chips, and war games: Women in the culture of computing. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19(4), 451-462.
31.
Kim, Jae-On, & Mueller, Charles W. (1978). Factor analysis Statistical methods and practical issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Lockheed, Marlaine E., Thorpe, Margaret, Brooks-Gunn, J., Casserly, Patricia, & McAloon, Ann. (1985). Sex & ethnic difference in middle school mathematics, science and computer science What do we knowPnnceton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
34.
Lockheed, Marlaine E. & Frakt, Steven B. (1984, April). Sex equality: Increasing girls' use of computers. Computing Teacher, 11, 67-77.
35.
Markoff, John. (1989, February 13). Computing in America: A masculine mystique. New York Times, 1, 7.
36.
Miura, Irene T. (1984). Processes contributing to individual difference in computerhteracy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
37.
Nelson, F. Howard. (1985). Black computer workers: Closing the gap in high technology employment. Journal of Negro Education, 54(4), 548-557.
38.
Ogozalek, Virginia Z. (1989). A comparison of male and female computer science students' attitudes toward computers. SIGCSE Bulletin21(2), 8-14.
39.
Osgood, Charles E., May, William H., & Miron, Murray S. (1975). Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
40.
Osgood, Charles E., Suci, George J., & Tannenbaum, Percy H. (1957). The measurement of meaning . Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
41.
Rothschild, Joan. (1986). Turing's man, Turing's woman, or Turing's person?: Gender, language, and computers. Working Paper No. 166, Wellesley College, MA. Center for Research on Women.
42.
Sanders, Jo Shuchat. (1985, April). Here's how you can help girls take greater advantage of school computers. The American School Board Journal , 172 (4), 37-38.
43.
Sanders, Jo Shuchat. (1984, April). The computer: Male, female or androgynous ? The Computing Teacher, 31-32.
44.
Schubert, Jane G. (1986). Gender equity in computer learning. Theory Into Practice, XXV (4) 267-275.
45.
Shields, Mark. (1985, June 23-26). Gender, computing experience, and attitudes toward computing: A survey of Brown University undergraduates. Paper presented at IBM's University Advanced Education Projects (AEP) Conference
46.
Smith, Sara D. (1985). Relationships of computer attitudes to sex, grade-level, and teacher influence. Education, 106 (3), 338-344.
47.
Snider, James G., & Osgood, Charles E. (1969). Semantic differential technique. Chicago : Aldme.
48.
Snyder, Thomas D. (1988). Digest of education statistics 1988. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics .
49.
Sproull, Lee., Zubrow, David, & Kiesler, Sara. (1985). Socialization to computing in college. Committee on Social Science Research in Computing, Carnegie-Mellon University.
50.
Tembeck, Shoshana & Meisch, Lynn. (1987, October) Women in computing: Caught in the middle . PC World, 5(10), 270-276.
51.
Turkle, Sherry. (1984, Nov./Dec.). Women and computer programming: A different approach. Technology Review, 87, 48-50.
52.
Turner, Judith A. (1989, March 29). Computer-enrollment drop laid to 'hacker' image. Chronicle of Higher Education, A19.
53.
Wagman, Morton. (1983). A factor analytic study of the psychological implications of the computer for the individual and society. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 15(4), 413-419.
54.
Wilder, Gita, Mackie, Diane, & Cooper, Joel. (1985). Genders and computers: Two surveys of computer-related attitudes. Sex Roles, 13(3,4), 215-228.
55.
Zimmerman, Jan. (1981). Technology and the future of women: Haven't we met somewhere before? Women's Studies International Quarterly , 4(3), 355-367.
