This paper provides a conceptual framework for examining the effects of computer systems upon control in organizations. The authors propose that computers be seen as a media of control—control viewed as non-zero sum, and computers as changing the overall amount of control exercised within organizations. Keywords: computer impacts, organization theory, control, power, technological change, computers, social impact, organization theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bozeman, B. & Bretteschneider, S. (1986). Public Management information systems: Theory and prescriptionPublic Administration Review, 46, 475-487.
2.
Brodman, J. (1986, April). Microcomputers m developing countries: Opportunities and obstaclesPaper prepared for the International Development Management Center, University of Maryland, College Park.
3.
Bums, T., & Stalker, G.M. (1966). The management of innovationLondon: Tavistock Publications.
4.
Danziger, J.N. (1985, March). Social science and the impacts of computer technologySocial Science Quarterly, 66,3-21.
5.
Danziger, J.N. & Kraemer, K.L. (1986). People and computingNew York : Columbia University Press.
6.
Danziger, J.N., Dutton, W.H., Kling, R. & Kraemer, K.L. (1982). Computers and politicsNew York: Columbia University Press.
7.
Garson, G.D. (1987, September). Human resource management, computers and organization theoryPaper presented at the 1987 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
8.
Johnson, B.M. & Rice, R.E. (1987). Managing organizational innovationNew York: Columbia University Press.
9.
Kanter, R.M. (1983). The change mastersNew York : Simon & Schuster, Inc.
10.
Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and women of the corporationNew York: Basic Books.
11.
Kraemer, K.L. & Danziger, J.N. (1984). Computers and control in the work environmentPublic Administration Review , 44, 32-42.
12.
Kraemer, K.L., King, J.L., Dunkel, D.E. & Lane, J.P. (1988). Computer use in mumcipalities: The state of the practiceIrvme, CA. Public Policy Research Organization, University of California.
McLuhan, M. (1965). Understanding media. The extensions manNew York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizationsEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16.
Norris, D.F. (1989). High tech in city hall: Uses and effects of microcomputers in U.S. local governmentsSocial Science Computer Review , 7, 137-146.
17.
Norris, D.F. & Thompson, L. (1989). High tech effects: a model for research on microcomputers and public organizations Forthcoming in 1989 in Nagel, S. S. & Garson, G. D. (Eds.), 1989JAI Research Annual, Social Science and Computers.
18.
Pearson, R.W.Computers and contemporary society. In the 1983-1984 and 1984-1985Annual Reports of the Social Science Research Council.
19.
Perrolle, J.A. (1988). The social impact of computing: Ideological theme and researchSocial Science Computer Review , 6, 469-480.
20.
Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizationsAmerican Sociological Review, 32, 194-208.
21.
Perrow, C. (1977). The bureaucratic paradox: The efficient organization centralizes in order to decentralizeOrgamzational Dynamics , p. 3-14.
22.
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organizationsNew York: Harper & Row.
23.
Scott, W.R. (1981). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systemsEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
24.
Tannenbaum, A. S. (Ed.). (1968). Control m organizations.New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in actionNew York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Tnst, E. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems. Occasional paper no. 2, Issues in the quality of working life centre, Toronto, Ontario. 1-67.
27.
Trist, E.L. & Bamforth, K.W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-gettingHuman Relations, 4, 3-38.
28.
Volti, R. (1988). Society and technological changeNew York: St. Martin's Press.
29.
Weick, K.E. (1979). The social psychology of organizingReading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30.
Woodward, J. (1958). Management and technologyLondon: H.M.S.O.
