This paper describes several techniques for using computers to assist with literature reviews. It identifies various literature review tasks, then discusses how existing programs can be used to address them. Programs discussed include word processors, qualitative analysis programs, content analysis programs, file management systems, database management systems, spreadsheets, and statistical programs. The paper concludes that judicious use of existing programs offers a powerful means to transform the literature review from a burdensome task resulting in a quickly outdated product to a more manageable task producing a product that is flexible, cumulative, and better able to cope with the rapid growth of knowledge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Becker, Howard S., Blanche Geer, Everett C. Hughes, and Anselm L. Strauss , Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School . Chicago: University of Chicago Pre;ss, 1961.
2.
Bracht, G., and G. Glass, "The external validity of experiments," American Educational Research Journal, 5, (1968), 437-474.
3.
Brent, Edward E. and James Campbell, "Scaling and Classification with Microcomputers," Computers and the Social Sciences. 2: 2 (1986).
4.
Cohen, J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral SciencesNew York: Academic Press, 1977.
5.
Cooper, Harris, "The Literature Review: Elevating its Status to Scientific Inquiry," Technical Report #238. Columbia, MO: Center for Research in Social Behavior, 1980.
6.
Crane, D., "Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the 'Invisible College' Hypothesis," American Sociological Review, 34 (1969), 335-352.
7.
Cuadra, C. and R. Katter, "Opening the Black Box of Relevance," Journal of Documentation , 23 (1967), 291-303.
8.
Davidson, D., "The Effects of Individual Differences of Cognitive Style on Judgments of Document Relevance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 8 (1977), 273-284.
9.
DeSanctis, Gerardine, "Computer Graphics as Decision Aids: Directions for Research," Working Paper MISRC-WP-84-04 Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Management Information Systems Research Center, 1984.
10.
Drass, Kriss, "The Analysis of Qualitative Data: A Computer Program," Urban Life, 9 (1980), 322-353.
11.
Feliciano, G.D., R.D. Powers, and E.K. Bryant, "The Presentation of Statistical Information," Audio Visual Communication Review, 11 ( 1963), 32-39.
12.
Gage, N., The Scientific Basis of the Art of Teaching. New York: Teachers College Press, 1978 .
13.
Gassaway, Robert, William Elder, and James Campbell, "Word Processors for Qualitative Sociologists: A Review Essay," Qualitative Sociology, 7 ( 1984), 157-168.
14.
Glass, G., "Integrating Findings: The Meta-Analysis of Research," Review of Research in Education, 5. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock, 1977
15.
Goffman, Erving, The Presentation of Self in Everyday LifeNew York : Doubleday, 1959.
16.
Gottfredson, S., "Evaluating Psychological Research Reports," American Psychologist, 33 (1978), 920-934.
17.
Holsti, Ole R., Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969 .
18.
Hunter, J. and F. Schmidt, "Differential and Single Group Validity of Employment Tests by Race: A Critical Analysis of Three Recent Studies," Journal of Applied Psychology, 63 (1978), 1-11.
19.
Hunter, John E., Frank L. Schmidt and Gregg B. Jackson , Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982.
20.
Jackson, G., "Methods for Integrative Reviews," Review of Educational Research, 50 (1980), 438-460.
21.
Krippendorff, Klaus, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1980.
22.
Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1962.
23.
Lawrence, John Shelton, The Electronic Scholar A Guide to Academic Microcomputing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1984.
24.
Leibold, Anne, "Bibliographic Data Bases in the Humanities: A Performance Study," Sixth International Conference on Computers and the Humanities1983. Rockville, MD: Computer Science Press, 1983, 368-382.
25.
Light, R. and P. Smith, "Accumulating Evidence: Procedures for Resolving Contradictions Among Different Research Studies," Havard Educational Review, 41 (1971), 429-471.
26.
Lord, C., L. Ross, and M. Lepper, "Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (1979), 2098-2109.
27.
Lusk, E.J., and M. Kersnick, "Effects of Cognitive Style and Report Format on Task Performance: The MIS Design Consequences," Management Science, 25 (1979), 787-798.
28.
Mahoney, M., "Publication Prejudices: An Experimental Study of Confirmatory Bias in the Peer Review System," Cognitive Therapy and Research , 1 (1977), 161-175.
29.
Matheson, D., R. Bruce, and K. Beauchamp, Experimental Psychology, 3rd Ed. New York: Holt, 1978 .
30.
Meadow, C., Applied Data Management. New York: Wiley, 1976.
31.
Menzel, H., "Scientific Communication: Five Themes from Sociology," American Psychologist, 21 (1966 ), 999-1004.
32.
Pillemer, D. and R. Light, "Benefiting from Variation in Study Outcomes," New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, 5 (1980), 1-11.
33.
Presby, S., "Overly Broad Categories Obscure Important Differences between Therapies ," American Psychologist, 33 (1978), 504-515.
34.
Resnick, A., "Relative Effectiveness of Document Titles and Abstracts for Determining Relevances of Documents," Science, 134 (1961), 1004-1006.
35.
Rosenthal, R. and D. Rubin, "Interpersonal Expectancy Effects: The First 345 Studies," The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3 ( 1976), 374-415.
36.
Seidel, John and J. Clark, "The ETHNOGRAPH: A Computer Program for the Analysis of Qualitative Data," Qualitative Sociology, 7 (1984), 110-125.
37.
Smith, M. and G. Glass, "Meta-Analysis of Psychotherapy Outcome Studies," American Psychologist, 32 (1977 ), 752-760.
38.
Stewart, David W., Secondary Research: Information Sources and Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1984.
39.
Taveggia, T., "Resolving Research Controversy Through Empirical Cumulation," Sociological Methods and Research, 2 ( 1974), 395-407.
40.
Viana, M., "Statistical Methods for Summarizing Independent Correlational Results ," Journal of Educational Statistics, 5 (1980), 83-104.
41.
Wynar, B.S., Introduction to Cataloging and Classification. 6th Ed., Littleton, CO.: Libraries Unlimited, 1980.
