The October 2017 Las Vegas shooting was the deadliest shooting in modern American history, but little scholarship has examined the public uproar in its wake, particularly in digital networks. Drawing on a corpus of 100,000 public Tweets and 1,119,638 unique words written in reaction to the shooting, this article addresses this lacuna by investigating the topics of reactions and their linkages with elites. This article theorizes that elites invigorate the emotionality of public reactions and broker the connection between discursive and affective content in digital networks. The results show that Tweets engaging with elites expressed statistically greater emotionality and extremity in emotional valences compared to Tweets written independent of elites. Additionally, this article identifies variations in the discursive themes invoked based on the types of elites. Mentions of non-political elites drew on themes about expressive support and depictions of the immediate environment with little emotional extremity. By contrast, mentions of political elites drew on themes about broader policy debates on gun ownership laws and adherent policy reforms. Unlike with non-political elites, mentions of political elites also exhibited greater extremity in negative emotional valences, reflective of increasing polarization in American politics.
AdayS. (2010). Leading the charge: Media, elites, and the use of emotion in stimulating rally effects in wartime. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 440–465.
2.
AsurS.HubermanB.SzaboG.WangC. (2011). Trends in ssocial mmedia: Persistence and ddecay. 5th Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1), 434–437.
3.
AuA. (2020). Reconceptualizing the generation in a digital (izing) modernity: Digital media, social networking sites, and the flattening of generations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 50(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12239
AuA. (2022). Guanxi in an age of digitalization: Toward assortation and value homophily in new tie-formation. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 9(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-022-00165-2
6.
AuA. (2023). Chinese social networks in an age of digitalization: Liquid guanxi. Routledge.
BogrenA. (2010). Studying social power in textual data: Combining tools for analyzing meaning and positioning. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903453955
9.
BoulianneS.Koc-MichalskaK.BimberB. (2020). Mobilizing media: Comparing TV and social media effects on protest mobilization. Information, Communication and Society, 23(5), 642-664, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2020.1713847
10.
BoydD. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press.
11.
boydd. m.EllisonN. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
12.
BraderT.MarcusG. E. (2013). Emotions and political psychology. In HuddyL.SearsD. O.LevyJ. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 384–401). Oxford University Press.
13.
BreuerA.LandmanT.FarquharD. (2015). Social media and protest mobilization: Evidence from the Tunisian revolution. Democratization, 22(4), 764–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.885505
14.
ChildressC.RawlingsC. M.MoeranB. (2017). Publishers, authors, and texts: The process of cultural consecration in prize evaluation. Poetics, 60, 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.10.001
15.
CinelliM.De Francisci MoralesG.GaleazziA.QuattrociocchiW.StarniniM. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9). Article e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
16.
DemertzisN. (2020). The political sociology of emotions: Essays on trauma and ressentiment. Routledge.
17.
DolliverM. J.KearnsE. M. (2022). Is it terrorism? Public perceptions, media, and labeling the Las Vegas shooting. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 45(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2019.1647673
18.
DuboisE.MinaeianS.Paquet-LabelleA.BeaudryS. (2020). Who to trust on social media: How opinion leaders and seekers avoid disinformation and echo chambers. Social Media + Society, 6(2), Article 205630512091399. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120913993
19.
DuncombeC. (2019). The politics of twitter: Emotions and the power of social media. International Political Sociology, 13(4), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olz013
20.
EltantawyN.WiestJ. (2011). Social media in the Egyptian uprising: Reconsidering resource mobilization theory. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1207–1224.
21.
EngesserS.ErnstN.EsserF.BüchelF. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication and Society, 20(8), 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1207697
22.
Eslen-ZiyaH.McGarryA.JenzenO.ErhartI.KorkutU. (2019). From anger to solidarity: The emotional echo-chamber of Gezi park protests. Emotion, Space and Society, 33(November), Article 100632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2019.100632
23.
GaoH.BarbierG.GoolsbyR. (2011). Harnessing the crowdsourcing power of social media for disaster relief. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26(3), 10–14.
24.
GervaisB. T. (2019). Rousing the partisan combatant: Elite incivility, anger, and antideliberative attitudes. Political Psychology, 40(3), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12532
GriswoldW. (2012). Cultures and societies in a changing world (4th ed.). Sage.
27.
GruzdA.WellmanB.TakhteyevY. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10), 1294–1318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211409378
28.
GuoL.A RohdeJ.WuH. D. (2020). Who is responsible for twitter’s echo chamber problem? Evidence from 2016 US election networks. Information, Communication and Society, 23(2), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2018.1499793
29.
HochschildA. (2012). The outsourced self: Intimate life in market times. Metropolitan Books.
30.
HoustonJ. B.HawthorneJ.PerreaultM. F.ParkE. H.Goldstein HodeM.HalliwellM. R.Turner McGowenS. E.DavisR.VaidS.McElderryJ.GriffithS. A. (2015). Social media and disasters: A functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12092
31.
IlliaL.SonparK.BauerM. W. (2014). Applying co-occurrence text analysis with ALCESTE to studies of impression management. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 352–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00842.x
32.
IyengarS.WestwoodS. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152
33.
JasperJ. (2008). The art of moral protest: Culture, biography, and creativity in social movements. University of Chicago Press.
34.
JonesN. M.WojcikS. P.SweetingJ.SilverR. C. (2016). Tweeting negative emotion: An investigation of Twitter data in the aftermath of violence on college campuses. Psychological Methods, 21(4), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000099
35.
KantackB. R.PaschallC. E. (2020). Does “politicizing” gun violence increase support for gun control? Experimental evidence from the Las Vegas shooting. Social Science Quarterly, 101(2), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12754
36.
LeaverT.HighfieldT.AbidinC. (2020). Instagram: Visual social media cultures. John Wiley and Sons.
37.
LiY. T.FungK. Y. (2022). Donating to the fight for democracy: The connective activism of overseas Hong Kongers and Taiwanese in the 2019 Anti‐extradition bill movement. Global Networks, 22(2), 292–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12345
38.
MarcusG. E.NeumanW. R.MacKuenM. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. University of Chicago Press.
39.
MathioudakisM.KoudasN. (2010). Twittermonitor: Trend detection over the twitter stream. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data (pp. 1155–1158). ACM Press.
40.
MercerJ (2014). Feeling like a state: Social emotion and identity. International Theory, 6(3), 515–535.
41.
MungerK.BonneauR.NaglerJ.TuckerJ. A. (2019). Elites tweet to get feet off the streets: Measuring regime social media strategies during protest. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(04), 815–834. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.3
42.
O'ConnellE.AbbottR. P.WhiteR. S. (2017). Emotions and beliefs after a disaster: A comparative analysis of Haiti and Indonesia. Disasters, 41(4), 803–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12227
43.
Oeldorf-HirschA.SundarS. S. (2015). Posting, commenting, and tagging: Effects of sharing news stories on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 44(March), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.024.
44.
OstertagS. F. (2021). A cultural sociology of social media: Social drama, cultural affordances and blogging in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Cultural Sociology, 15(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975520946609
45.
OttB. L. (2017). The age of twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686
46.
PughA. J. (2013). What good are interviews for thinking about culture? Demystifying interpretive analysis. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 1, 42–68. https://doi.org/10.1057/ajcs.2012.4
47.
RinscheidA.PiantaS.WeberE. U. (2021). What shapes public support for climate change mitigation policies? The role of descriptive social norms and elite cues. Behavioural Public Policy, 5(4), 503–527. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.43
48.
RocklageM. D.FazioR. H. (2015). The Evaluative Lexicon: Adjective use as a means of assessing and distinguishing attitude valence, extremity, and emotionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56(January), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.10.005.
49.
RocklageM. D.RuckerD. D.NordgrenL. F. (2018). The Evaluative Lexicon 2.0: The measurement of emotionality, extremity, and valence in language. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1327–1344. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0975-6
50.
RuxtonG. D. (2006). The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Behavioral Ecology, 17(4), 688–690. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ark016
51.
SabooA. R.KumarV.RamaniG. (2016). Evaluating the impact of social media activities on human brand sales. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(3), 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.02.007
52.
SaloJ.LankinenM.MäntymäkiM. (2013). The use of social media for artist marketing: Music industry perspectives and consumer motivations. The International Journal on Media Management, 15(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2012.755682
53.
SaltonG.BuckleyC. (1988). Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 24(5), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(88)90021-0
54.
SievertC.ShirleyK. (2014). LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics. In Proceedings of the workshop on interactive language learning, visualization, and interfaces (pp. 63–70). Association for Computational Linguistics.
SnowD.BenfordR.McCammonH.HewittL.FitzgeraldS. (2014). The emergence, development, and future of the framing perspective: 25+ years since “frame alignment. Mobilization: International Quarterly, 19(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.19.1.x74278226830m69l
57.
StapletonC. E.DawkinsR. (2022). Catching my anger: How political elites create angrier citizens. Political Research Quarterly, 75(3), 754–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129211026972
58.
StieglitzS.Dang-XuanL. (2013). Emotions and information diffusion in social media—sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 217–248. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222290408
59.
SuttonJ.PalenL.ShklovskiI. (2008). Backchannels on the front lines: Emergency uses of social media in the 2007 Southern California Wildfires. In Proceedings of the 5th international ISCRAM conference (pp. 624–632). Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management.
TianX.GuoY. (2021). An online acquaintance community: The emergence of Chinese virtual civility. Symbolic Interaction, 44(4), 771–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.537
62.
TsurO.RappoportA. (2012). What's in a hashtag? Content based prediction of the spread of ideas in microblogging communities. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (pp. 643–652). Association for Computing Machinery.
63.
ValentinoN. A.BraderT.GroenendykE. W.GregorowiczK.HutchingsV. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381610000939
64.
Van BovenL.EhretP. J.ShermanD. K. (2018). Psychological barriers to bipartisan public support for climate policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 13(4), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617748966
65.
Van BovenL.ShermanD. K. (2021). Elite influence on public attitudes about climate policy. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42(December), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.023.
66.
VerboordM.NoordS. V. (2016). The online place of popular music: Exploring the impact of geography and social media on pop artists’ mainstream media attention. Popular Communication, 14(2), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2015.1019073
67.
WarnerB. R.McGowenS. T.HawthorneJ. (2012). Limbaugh’s social media nightmare: Facebook and Twitter as spaces for political action. Journal of Radio and Audio Media, 19(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2012.722479
68.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol 2): University of California Press.
69.
WellmanB.RainieL. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
70.
WhittleR.WalkerM.MeddW.MortM. (2012). Flood of emotions: Emotional work and long-term disaster recovery. Emotion, Space and Society, 5(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2011.08.002
71.
WidmannT. (2022). Fear, hope, and COVID-19: Emotional elite rhetoric and its impact on the public during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Political Psychology, 43(5), 827–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12831
72.
WinterS.NeubaumG. (2016). Examining characteristics of opinion leaders in social media: A motivational approach. Social Media + Society, 2(3), Article 205630511666585. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116665858
WollebækD.KarlsenR.Steen-JohnsenK.EnjolrasB. (2019). Anger, fear, and echo chambers: The emotional basis for online behavior. Social Media + Society, 5(2), Article 205630511982985. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119829859
75.
YinJ.LampertA.CameronM.RobinsonB.PowerR. (2012). Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(6), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2012.6
