Breaking the Structural Reinforcement: An Agent-Based Model on Cultural Consumption and Social Relations

Abstract

Theorists since Marx, Bourdieu, and DiMaggio have asked how individual choices on cultural preference interact with collective social network structure. The rise of social media in today’s communication landscape motivates us to take a closer look at the involved dynamics. We designed an agent-based model to explore how different behavioral principles for cultural choice and communicative affiliation affect (1) collective consumption patterns, (2) social segregation, and (3) resilience of the emergent dynamic during exogenous distributions. We analyze the influence of individual agency on network structure, and vice versa, by simulating agents who pursue elite or popular culture, while communicating with others based on homophily or randomness. Our method allows us to go beyond specific constellations and explore the realm of theoretically possible combinations. We then used an exogenous disturbance on elite culture cost to test the resilience of social network structure. We found that only in societies where economic factors drive cultural consumption, increased access to elite culture can lead to reorganization in the social network and reduce segregation between different social groups. This is because the disturbance on consumption provides agents opportunities to connect with other social groups and opens a window for social mixing. We end by discussing how our model allows us to inform a diverse set of empirical research questions, including the cultural markets of social media, the digital divide, and the split between free misinformation and established news outlets.

Keywords

sociology social organization research methodologies agent-based model social network simulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguirre

B. E.

Quarantelli

E. L.

Mendoza

J. L.

(1988). The collective behavior of fads: The characteristics, effects, and career of streaking. American Sociological Review, 53(4), 569–584. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095850.

Alvarez-Galvez

(2016). Network models of minority opinion spreading. Social Science Computer Review, 34(5), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315605607.

Anheier

H. K.

Gerhards

Romo

F. P.

(1995). Forms of capital and social structure in cultural fields: Examining Bourdieu’s social topography. American Journal of Sociology, 100(4), 859–903.

Baek

Y. M.

(2015). Relationship between cultural distance and cross-cultural music video consumption on YouTube. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6), 730–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314562184.

Bearman

(1993). Relations into rhetorics. ASA Rose Monograph Series.

Bourdieu

(1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.

Carley

(1991). A theory of group stability. American Sociological Review, 56, 331–354.

Clark

H. H.

(1992). Arenas of language use. University of Chicago Press.

DeAngelo

T. I.

Yegiyan

N. S.

(2019). Looking for efficiency: How online news structure and emotional tone influence processing time and memory. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(2), 385–405.

10.

DiMaggio

(1987). Classification in art. American Sociological Review, 52, 440–455.

11.

DiMaggio

Mohr

(1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment, and marital selection. American Journal of Sociology, 90(6), 1231–1261.

12.

DiMaggio

Mohr

(1996). The intergenerational transmission of cultural capital Research on Social stratification and Mobility (pp. 167–199). JAI Press.

13.

Douglas

(1978). Cultural bias. Royal Anthropological Institute.

14.

Durkheim

Halls

W. D.

(1984). The division of labor in society. Free Press.

15.

Epstein

J. M.

(1999). Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity, 4(5), 41–60.

16.

Erickson

B. H.

(1996). Culture, class, and connections. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 217–251.

17.

Fiske

(2002). Television culture. Routledge.

18.

Fiske

(2010). Understanding popular culture. Routledge.

19.

Fortunato

(2010). Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports, 486(3–5), 75–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002.

20.

Foster

(1985). Postmodern culture. Pluto Press.

21.

Foucault Welles

Vashevko

Bennett

Contractor

(2014). Dynamic models of communication in an online friendship network. Communication Methods and Measures, 8(4), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2014.967843.

22.

Friemel

T. N.

(2020). Co-Orientation of media use: Studying selection and influence processes in social networks to link micro behavior of TV and YouTube use to meso-level structures. Communication Methods and Measures, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1745766.

23.

Gamson

W. A.

Croteau

Hoynes

Sasson

(1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual review of sociology, 18(1), 373-393.

24.

Helsper

E. J.

(2017). The social relativity of digital exclusion: Applying relative deprivation theory to digital inequalities. Communication Theory, 27(3), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12110.

25.

Hughes

Peterson

R. A.

(1983). Isolating cultural choice patterns in the US population. American behavioral scientist, 26(4), 459-478.

26.

Hussain

M. N.

Tokdemir

Agarwal

Al-Khateeb

(2018). Analyzing disinformation and crowd manipulation tactics on YouTube. In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), Barcelona Spain, 28–31 August, 2018. pp. 1092–1095.

27.

Jenkins

(2012). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. Routledge.

28.

Johnson

(2002). Who needs classical music?: cultural choice and musical value. Oxford University Press on Demand.

29.

Kahne

Bowyer

(2018). The political significance of social media activity and social networks. Political Communication, 35(3), 470–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1426662.

30.

Kay

F. M.

Hagan

(1998). Raising the bar: The gender stratification of law-firm capital. American Sociological Review, 63, 728–743.

31.

Lee

Chung

J. E.

Park

(2016). Linking cultural capital with subjective well-being and social support. Social Science Computer Review, 34(2), 172–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315577347.

32.

Lizardo

(2006). How cultural tastes shape personal networks. American sociological review, 71(5), 778-807.

33.

Loges

W. E.

Jung

J.-Y.

(2001). Exploring the digital divide. Communication Research, 28(4), 536–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028004007.

34.

Mangold

Scharkow

(2020). How do filtering choices impact the structures of audience networks? A simulation study using data from 26 countries. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1724274.

35.

Manovich

(2009). The practice of everyday (media) life: From mass consumption to mass cultural production? Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1086/596645.

36.

Mark

N. P.

(2003). Culture and competition: Homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches. American Sociological Review, 68, 319–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1519727.

37.

Martin

J. L.

(1997). Power structure and belief structure in 40 American communes. University of California.

38.

Marx

Engels

Ryazanskaya

(1964). The German ideology. Moscow: Progress Publishers..

39.

McLean

(2016). Culture in networks. John Wiley & Sons.

40.

McPherson

(2004). A Blau space primer: Prolegomenon to an ecology of affiliation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(1), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/13.1.263.

41.

McQuail

(1987). Mass communication theory: An introduction. Sage Publications, Inc.

42.

Messing

Westwood

S. J.

(2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406.

43.

Mische

(2011). Relational sociology, culture, and agency (pp. 80–97). The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis.

44.

Norris

(2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press.

45.

Ortner

S. B.

(1984). Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26(1), 126. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1785.

46.

Osei-Asamoah

Lownes

N. E.

(2014). Complex network method of evaluating resilience in surface transportation networks. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2467(1), 120–128.

47.

Park

S. Y.

Laplante

Lee

J. H.

Kaneshiro

(2019). Tunes together: Perception and experience of collaborative playlists. ISMIR, 723–730. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3527912.

48.

Peterson

R. A.

(1979). Revitalizing the culture concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 5(1), 137–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.SO.05.080179.001033.

49.

Reynolds

R. M.

(2020). Diffusion in information-seeking networks: Testing the interaction of network hierarchy and fluidity with agent-based modeling. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1784401.

50.

Salganik

M. J.

Dodds

P. S.

Watts

D. J.

(2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311(5762), 854–856. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121066.

51.

Salo

Lankinen

Mäntymäki

(2013). The use of social media for artist marketing: Music industry perspectives and consumer motivations. International Journal on Media Management, 15(1), 23–41.

52.

Saunders-Newton

(2002). Introduction. Social Science Computer Review, 20(4), 373–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443902237316.

53.

Smaldino

P. E.

(2017). Models are stupid, and we need more of them. In Vallacher

R. R.

Read

S. J.

Nowak

(Eds.), Computational social psychology (1st ed., pp. 311–331). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315173726-14.

54.

Spotify (2021). Spotify premium. Spotify. https://www.spotify.com/us/premium/.

55.

Sterrett

Malato

Benz

Kantor

Tompson

Rosenstiel

Sonderman

Loker

(2019). Who shared it?: Deciding what news to trust on social media. Digital Journalism, 7(6), 783–801.

56.

Trigg

A. B.

(2001). Veblen, Bourdieu, and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Economic Issues, 35(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2001.11506342.

57.

Tully

Vraga

E. K.

Bode

(2020). Designing and testing news literacy messages for social media. Mass Communication and Society, 23(1), 22–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1604970.

58.

van Dijk

(2020). The digital divide. John Wiley & Sons.

59.

Van Eijck

(2001). Social differentiation in musical taste patterns. Social forces, 79(3), 1163-1185.

60.

Veblen

(2005). Conspicuous consumption. Penguin UK.

61.

Vriens

van Ingen

(2018). Does the rise of the Internet bring erosion of strong ties? Analyses of social media use and changes in core discussion networks. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2432–2449. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724169.

62.

Waldherr

(2014). Emergence of news waves: A social simulation approach. Journal of Communication, 64(5), 852–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12117.

63.

Wilensky

(1999). Netlogo. Northwestern University.

64.

Worrall

(2019). “Connections above and beyond”: Information, translation, and community boundaries in library thing and goodreads. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(7), 742–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24153.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.11 MB