There is great interest to use artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to improve government processes and public services. However, the adoption of technologies has often been challenging for public administrations. In this article, the adoption of AI in governmental organizations has been researched as a form of information and communication technologies (ICT)–enabled governance innovation in the public sector. Based on findings from three cases of AI adoption in public sector organizations, this article shows strong similarities between the antecedents identified in previous academic literature and the factors contributing to the use of AI in government. The adoption of AI in government does not solely rely on having high-quality data but is facilitated by numerous environmental, organizational, and other factors that are strictly intertwined among each other. To address the specific nature of AI in government and the complexity of its adoption in the public sector, we thus propose a framework to provide a comprehensive overview of the key factors contributing to the successful adoption of AI systems, going beyond the narrow focus on data, processing power, and algorithm development often highlighted in the mainstream AI literature and policy discourse.
AgarwalP. K. (2018). Public administration challenges in the world of AI and Bots. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 917–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12979
2.
AlexopoulosC.LachanaZ.AndroutsopoulouA.DiamantopoulouV.CharalabidisY.LoutsarisM. A. (2019). How machine learning is changing e-government. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance—ICEGOV2019, Part F1481 (pp. 354–363). https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326412
3.
AndroutsopoulouA.KaracapilidisN.LoukisE.CharalabidisY. (2019). Transforming the communication between citizens and government through AI-guided chatbots. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.001
4.
BaileyD. E.BarleyS. R. (2019). Beyond design and use: How scholars should study intelligent technologies. Information and Organization, 30(2), 100286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100286
5.
BarocasS.SelbstA. D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, 671(2016), 62.
6.
BaxterP.JackS. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation, 13(4), 544–559.
BertotJ.EstevezE.JanowskiT. (2016). Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.05.004
BorinsS. (2000). Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterprising leaders? Some evidence about innovative public managers. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 498–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00113
13.
BurrellJ. (2016, January). How the machine “Thinks:” Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2660674
CinarE.TrottP.SimmsC. (2018). A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Management Review, 21(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477
CriadoJ. I.Gil-GarciaJ. R. (2019). Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies: From digital services to artificial intelligence and beyond. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0178
21.
De VriesH.BekkersV.TummersL. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
22.
de VriesH.TummersL.BekkersV. (2018). The diffusion and adoption of public sector innovations: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(3), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvy001
23.
DesouzaK. C.DawsonG. S.ChenokD. (2020). Designing, developing, and deploying artificial intelligence systems: Lessons from and for the public sector. Business Horizons, 63(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.004
24.
DwivediY. K.HughesL.IsmagilovaE.AartsG.CoombsC.CrickT.DuanY.DwivediR.EdwardsJ.EirugA.GalanosV.IlavarasanP. V.JanssenM.JonesP.KarA. K.KizginH.KronemannB.LalB.LuciniB.…WilliamsM. D. (2019, August). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
EngstromD. F.HoD. E.SharkeyC. M.CuéllarM.-F. (2020). Government by algorithm: Artificial intelligence in federal administrative agencies. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3551505
FloridiL. (2017). Group privacy: A defence and an interpretation. In Group privacy (pp. 83–100). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46608-8_5
GuenduezA. A.MettlerT.SchedlerK. (2020). Technological frames in public administration: What do public managers think of big data?Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101406
32.
HarrisonT.Luna-ReyesL. F.PardoT.De PaulaN.NajafabadiM.PalmerJ. (2019). The data firehose and AI in government. 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325112.3325245
33.
HiningsB.GegenhuberT.GreenwoodR. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004
34.
JanssenM.KonopnickiD.SnowdonJ. L.OjoA. (2017). Driving public sector innovation using big and open linked data (BOLD). Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9746-2
35.
JunK. N.WeareC. (2011). Institutional motivations in the adoption of innovations: The case of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 495–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq020
36.
KamalM. M. (2006). IT innovation adoption in the government sector: Identifying the critical success factors. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 19(2), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390610645085
37.
KankanhalliA.CharalabidisY.MellouliS. (2019). IoT and AI for smart government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.02.003
KraemerK.KingJ. L. (2006). Information technology and administrative reform: Will e-government be different?International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2006010101
KuziemskiM.MisuracaG. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6), 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976
42.
LewisJ. M.RicardL. M.KlijnE. H. (2018). How innovation drivers, networking and leadership shape public sector innovation capacity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317694085
43.
LimaM. S. M.DelenD. (2020). Predicting and explaining corruption across countries: A machine learning approach. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101407
44.
MakridakisS. (2017). The forthcoming artificial intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. In Futures (Vol. 90, pp. 46–60). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006
MisuracaG.ViscusiG. (2015). Shaping public sector innovation theory: An interpretative framework for ICT-enabled governance innovation. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(3), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-015-9184-5
50.
MittelstadtB. D.AlloP.TaddeoM.WachterS.FloridiL. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
51.
Network of European Regions Using Space Technologies [NEREUS]. (2018). The ever growing use of COPERNICUS across Europe’s regions. European Commission.
52.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2019). Digital opportunities for better agricultural policies. In Digital opportunities for better agricultural policies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/571a0812-en
PottsJ.KastelleT. (2010). Public sector innovation research: What’s next?Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 12(2), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.2.122
55.
PreeceA.AshelfordR.ArmstrongH.BrainesD. (2018). Hows and whys of artificial intelligence for public sector decisions: Explanation and evaluation. http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.02689
56.
RogersE. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). Simon & Schuster.
57.
RusselS. J.NorvigP. (2016). Artificial intelligence—A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
58.
SchedlerK.GuenduezA. A.FrischknechtR. (2019). How smart can government be? Exploring barriers to the adoption of smart government. Information Polity, 24(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-180095
59.
SchererM. U. (2016). Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 29(2), 353–400.
60.
SørensenE.TorfingJ. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration and Society, 43(8), 842–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768
61.
de SousaW. G.de MeloE. R. P.BermejoP. H. D. S.FariasR. A. S.GomesA. O. (2019, July). How and where is artificial intelligence in the public sector going? A literature review and research agenda. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.004
62.
StoneP.BrooksR.BrynjolfssonE.CaloR.EtzioniO.HagerG.HirschbergJ.KalyanakrishnanS.KamarE.KrausS.Leyton-BrownK.ParkesD.PressW.SaxenianA.ShahJ.TambeM.TellerA. (2016).Artificial intelligence and life in 2030: One hundred year study on artificial intelligence. Stanford University, 52. https://doi.org/https://ai100.stanford.edu
63.
SunT. Q.MedagliaR. (2019). Mapping the challenges of artificial intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008
64.
SusarD.AquaroV. (2019, April). Artificial intelligence: Opportunities and challenges for the public sector. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 418–426). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326420
van NoordtC.MisuracaG. (2019). New wine in old bottles: Chatbots in government. In PanagiotopoulosP. (Ed.), Electronic participation. ePart 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27397-2_5
67.
VealeM.Van KleekM.BinnsR. (2018, April). Fairness and accountability design needs for algorithmic support in high-stakes public sector decision-making. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 440:1–440:14). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174014
68.
VinuesaR.AzizpourH.LeiteI.BalaamM.DignumV.DomischS.FelländerA.LanghansS. D.TegmarkM.Fuso NeriniF. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the sustainable development goals. Nature Communications, 11(1), 233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y
69.
WirtzB. W.WeyererJ. C.GeyerC. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector—Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
70.
YinR. K. (2018). Case study research: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
