Grounded in the relationship management theory and the situational theory of publics, this study examines the effects of employees’ perceived relationships with their organization on their situational perceptions and how these perceptions influence their communication behaviors on social media. An integrated model of situational organization–employee relationship is proposed and tested. The study was based on a national survey of 449 employees working at large organizations in the United States. Organization–employee relationships were found to facilitate employees’ problem recognition and level of involvement and to weaken their constraint recognition. Employees with low constraint recognition and high levels of involvement were more likely to seek, process, and share information on social media, whereas those with high problem recognition tended only to process information. This study is one of the first to integrate the relational perspective with the situational perspective. It also offers practical suggestions for large organizations on how to build and maintain quality relationships with employees and improve their communication behaviors on social media.
AldooryL. (2001). Making health communications meaningful for women: Factors that influence involvement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13, 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1302_3
2.
AldooryL.AustinL. (2011). Relationship building and situational publics: Theoretical approaches guiding today’s health public relations. In ThompsonT. L.ParrottR.NussbaumJ. F. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of health communication (pp. 132–145). Routledge.
3.
BrownH. (2015). The institutional digital divide: Immigrant-serving nonprofit organization adoption of social media. Social Science Computer Review, 33, 680–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314563002
4.
CarimL. A. R. A.WarwickC. (2013). Use of social media for corporate communications by research-funding organisations in the UK. Public Relations Review, 39, 521–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.08.006
5.
CenterA.JacksonP. (2003). Public relations practices: Managerial case studies and problems. Prentice Hall.
6.
ChadwickA.O’LoughlinB.VaccariC. (2017). Why people dual screen political debates and why it matters for democratic engagement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61, 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2017.1309415
7.
ChenY. R. R.Hung-BaeseckeC. J. F.KimJ. N. (2017). Identifying active hot-issue communicators and subgroup identifiers: Examining the situational theory of problem solving. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94, 124–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016629371
8.
CovertJ. M.StefanoneM. A. (2018). Does rejection still hurt? Examining the effects of network attention and exposure to online social exclusion. Social Science Computer Review. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318795128
EngelbergM.FloraJ. A.NassC. I. (1995). AIDS knowledge: Effects of channel involvement and interpersonal communication. Health Communication, 7, 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc0702_1
11.
FieselerC.MeckelM.RanziniG. (2015). Professional personae—How organizational identification shapes online identity in the workplace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12103
12.
FrandsenF.JohansenW. (2011). The study of internal crisis communication: Towards an integrative framework. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16, 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281111186977
13.
FrankA.BrownellJ. (1989). Organizational communication and behavior: Communicating to improve performance. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
14.
GrunigJ. E. (1968). Information, entrepreneurship, and economic development: A study of the decision making processes of Colombian Latifundistas [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
GrunigJ. E. (1997). A situational theory of publics: Conceptual history, recent challenges and new research. In MossD.MacManusT.VerčičD. (Eds.), Public relations research: An international perspective (pp. 3–46). International Thompson Business Press.
17.
GrunigJ. E.HuangY.-H. (2000). From organizational effectiveness to relationship indicators: Antecedents of relationships, public relations strategies, and relationship outcomes. In LedinghamJ. A.BruningS. D. (Eds.), Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (pp. 23–54). Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
GrunigJ. E.HuntT. (1984). Managing public relations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
19.
HallahanK. (1999). Content class as a contextual cue in the cognitive processing of publicity versus advertising. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1104_02
20.
HaywoodR. (2005). Corporate reputation, the brand and the bottom line: Powerful proven communication strategies for maximizing value. Kogan Page.
21.
HonL. C.GrunigJ. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. The Institute for Public Relations, Commission on PR Measurement and Evaluation.
22.
HsuC. L.LinJ. C. C. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management, 45, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.11.001
23.
KallaH. K. (2005). Integrated internal communications: A multidisciplinary perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10, 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280510630106
24.
KangM. (2013). Effects of the organization-public relational gap between experiential and expected relationship outcomes: Relational gap analysis. Journal of Communication Management, 17, 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541311300160
25.
KaplanA. M.HaenleinM. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
26.
KiE.-J. (2006). Linkages among relationship maintenance strategies, relationship quality outcomes, attitudes and behavioral intentions [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Florida.
27.
KimJ.SungM. (2016). The value of public relations: Different impacts of communal and exchange relationships on perceptions and communicative behavior. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2016.1191014
28.
KimJ.-N. (2006). Communicant activeness, cognitive entrepreneurship, and a situational theory of problem solving [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Maryland.
29.
KimJ.-N.GrunigJ. E. (2011). Problem solving and communicative action: A situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication, 61, 120–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01529.x
30.
KimJ.-N.NiL. (2013). Two types of public relations problems and integrating formative and evaluative research: A review of research programs within the behavioral, strategic management paradigm. Journal of Public Relations Research, 25, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2012.723276
31.
KimJ.-N.NiL.KimS. H.KimJ. R. (2012). What makes people hot? Applying the situational theory of problem solving to hot-issue publics. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24, 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2012.626133
32.
KimJ.-N.RheeY. (2011). Strategic thinking about employee communication behavior (ECB) in public relations: Testing the models of megaphoning and scouting effects in Korea. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23, 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2011.582204
33.
KimY. (2016). Understanding publics’ perception and behaviors in crisis communication: Effects of crisis news framing and publics’ acquisition, selection, and transmission of information in crisis situations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2015.1131697
34.
LandersR. N.CallanR. C. (2014). Validation of the beneficial and harmful work-related social media behavioral taxonomies: Development of the work-related social media questionnaire. Social Science Computer Review, 32, 628–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314524891
35.
LedinghamJ. A. (2003). Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15, 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1502_4
36.
LedinghamJ. A.BruningS. D. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(98)80020-9
37.
LeeC. S.MaL. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002
38.
LeeY.KimK. H.KimJ.-N. (2019). Understanding the impacts of issue types and employee–organization relationships on employees’ problem perceptions and communicative behaviors. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24, 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-12-2018-0127
MazzeiA.RavazzaniS. (2011). Manager-employee communication during a crisis: The missing link. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16, 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281111156899
41.
McNamaraC. (2006). Field guide to consulting and organizational development: A collaborative and systems approach to performance, change and learning. Authenticity Consulting.
42.
MenL. (2012). The effects of organizational leadership on strategic internal communication and employee outcomes [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Miami.
43.
MenL. R. (2011). Exploring the impact of employee empowerment on organization–employee relationship. Public Relations Review, 37, 435–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.008
44.
MenL. R. (2014). Why leadership matters to internal communication: Linking transformational leadership, symmetrical communication, and employee outcomes. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 256–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.908719
45.
MenL. R.StacksD. (2014). The effects of authentic leadership on strategic internal communication and employee-organization relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.908720
46.
MenL. R.SungY. (2019). Shaping corporate character through symmetrical communication: The effects on employee-organization relationships. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488418824989
47.
MoormanC.DeshpandéR.ZaltmanG. (1993). Factors affecting trust in marketing research relationships. Journal of Marketing, 57, 81–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252059
48.
MorrisonE. W.RobinsonS. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22, 226–256. https://doi.org/10.2307/259230
49.
MuntingaD. G.MoormanM.SmitE. G. (2011). Introducing COBRAs: Exploring motivations for brand-related social media use. International Journal of Advertising, 30, 13–46. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-1-013-046
50.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. Springer-Verlag.
51.
RafaeliS.RabanD. R. (2005). Information sharing online: A research challenge. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 1, 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2005.006251
RheeY. (2004). The employee-public-organization chain in relationship management: A case study of a government organization [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Maryland
54.
ShaB.-L. (2006). Cultural identity in the segmentation of publics: An emerging theory of intercultural public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1801_3
55.
SlaterM. D.ChipmanH.AuldG.KeefeT.KendallP. (1992). Information processing and situational theory: A cognitive response analysis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4, 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0404_1
56.
SnoeijersE. M.PoelsK.NicolayC. (2014). #universitycrisis: The impact of social media type, source, and information on student responses toward a university crisis. Social Science Computer Review, 32, 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314525025
57.
StoneD. L.Stone-RomeroE. F.LukaszewskiK. (2003). The functional and dysfunctional consequences of human resource information technology for organizations and their employees. In StoneD. L. (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research (Vol. 3, pp. 37–68). Emerald.
58.
StrandbergJ. M.VigsøO. (2016). Internal crisis communication: An employee perspective on narrative, culture, and sensemaking. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21, 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-11-2014-0083
59.
StrömbäckJ.MitrookM. A.KiousisS. (2010). Bridging two schools of thought: Applications of public relations theory to political marketing. Journal of Political Marketing, 9, 73–92. https://doi.org/.10.1080/15377850903472547
60.
TreemJ. W.LeonardiP. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook, 36, 143–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130
van ZoonenW.BanghartS. (2018). Talking engagement into being: A three-wave panel study linking boundary management preferences, work communication on social media, and employee engagement. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23, 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy014
63.
WaldenJ.JungE. H.WestermanC. Y. (2017). Employee communication, job engagement, and organizational commitment: A study of members of the Millennial Generation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 29, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2017.1329737
64.
WangY.KiE. J.KimY. (2017). Exploring the perceptual and behavioral outcomes of public engagement on mobile phones and social media. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 11, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2017.1280497
65.
WilcoxD. L.CameronG. T.ReberB. H. (2015). Public relations: Strategies and tactics (11th ed.). Pearson.
66.
WinterS. (2020). Do anticipated Facebook discussions diminish the importance of argument quality? An experimental investigation of attitude formation in social media. Media Psychology, 23, 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1572521
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
