This article distinguishes between clique family subgroups and communities in a crisis response network. Then, we examine the way organizations interacted to achieve a common goal by employing community analysis of an epidemic response network in Korea in 2015. The results indicate that the network split into two groups: core response communities in one group and supportive functional communities in the other. The core response communities include organizations across government jurisdictions, sectors, and geographic locations. Other communities are confined geographically, homogenous functionally, or both. We also find that whenever intergovernmental relations were present in communities, the member connectivity was low, even if intersectoral relations appeared together within them.
BlondelV. D.GuillaumeJ. L.LambiotteR.LefebvreE. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008, P10008.
2.
BoinA.’t HartP. (2010). Organising for effective emergency management: Lessons from research. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69, 357–371.
3.
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G.JohnsonJ. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
4.
BrooksJ. A. M.BodeauD.FedorowiczJ. (2013). Network management in emergency response: Articulation practices of state-level managers—Interweaving up, down, and sideways. Administration & Society, 45, 911–948.
5.
ButtsC. T.ActonR. M.MarcumC. S. (2012). Interorganizational collaboration in the Hurricane Katrina response. Journal of Social Structure, 13, 1–37.
6.
CelikS.CorbaciogluS. (2016). From linearity to complexity: Emergent characteristics of the 2006 Avian Influenza Response System in Turkey. Safety Science, 90, 5–13.
7.
ChristensenT.OleA. D.LÆgreidP.RykkjaL. H. (2016). Comparing coordination structures for crisis management in six countries. Public Administration, 94, 316–332.
8.
ClarkeL. (1999). Mission improbable: Using fantasy documents to tame disaster. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
ComfortL. K. (2007). Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, coordination, communication. Public Administration Review, 67, 189–197.
10.
ComfortL. K.HaaseT. W. (2006). Communication, coherence, and collective action. Public Works Management & Policy, 10, 328–343.
11.
DeJongM. (1975). A comparison of three diversity indices based on their components of richness and evenness. Oikos, 26, 222–227.
12.
FortunatoS.LatoraV.MarchioriM. (2004). Method to find community structures based on information centrality. Physical Review E—Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics, 70, 13.
13.
GirvanM.NewmanM. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 7821–7826.
14.
GleiserP.DanonL. (2003). Community structure in jazz. Advances in Complex Systems, 6, 565–573. doi:10.1142/S0219525903001067
15.
GoD. Y.ParkJ. (2018). A comparative study of infectious disease government in Korea: what we can learn from the 2003 SARS and the 2015 MERS outbreak. Korean Policy Studies Review, 27, 243–280.
16.
GruzdA.WellmanB.TakhteyevY. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 1294–1318.
17.
HagenL.KellerT.NeelyS.DePaulaN.Robert-CoopermanC. (2018). Crisis communications in the age of social media: A network analysis of Zika-related Tweets. Social Science Computer Review, 36, 523–541.
HodgeJ. G. (2015). Global and domestic legal preparedness and response: 2014 Ebola outbreak. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 9, 47–50.
20.
HodgeJ. G.GostinL. O.VernickJ. S. (2007). Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act. Journal of American Medical Association, 297, 1708–1711.
21.
HossainL.KutiM. (2010). Disaster response preparedness coordination through social networks. Disasters, 34, 755–786.
22.
KapucuN. (2005). Interorganizational coordination in dynamic context: Networks in emergency response management. Connections, 26, 35.
23.
KapucuN.ArslanT.CollinsM. L. (2010). Examining intergovernmental and interorganizational response to catastrophic disasters: Toward a network-centered approach. Administration & Society, 42, 222–247.
24.
KapucuN.GarayevV. (2011). Collaborative decision-making in emergency and disaster management. International Journal of Public Administration, 34, 366–375.
25.
KapucuN.GarayevV. (2016). Structure and network performance: Horizontal and vertical networks in emergency management. Administration & Society, 48, 931–961.
26.
KarrerB.LevinaE.NewmanM. E. J. (2008). Robustness of community structure in networks. Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 77, 1–10.
27.
KimY.ZhangJ. (2016). Digital government and wicked problems. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 769–776.
28.
KimY.KimJ. H.OhS. S.KimS-WKuM. (2019). Subgroup analysis of an epidemic response network of organizations: 2015 MERS outbreak in Korea. In Proceeding of 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3325112.3325260
29.
Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreak in the Republic of Korea, 2015. Osong Public Health and Research Perspective, 6, 269–278.
30.
Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2016). The 2015 MERS White Paper. Seoul, South Korea: Ministry of Health and Welfare.
LimS.KimJ.LeeJ. G. (2016). BlackHole: Robust community detection inspired by graph drawing. In 2016 IEEE 32nd international conference on data engineering, 25–36. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
33.
MokkenR. J. (1979). Cliques, clubs and clans. Quality & Quantity, 13, 161–173.
34.
MoodyJ.ColemanJ. (2015). Clustering and cohesion in networks: Concepts and measures. In WrightJ. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 906–912). New York, NY: Elsevier.
35.
MoynihanD. P. (2009). The network governance of crisis response: Case studies of incident command systems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 895–915.
36.
NewmanM. E. J.GirvanM. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 69, 1–15.
37.
NowellB.SteelmanT.VelezA. L. K.YangZ. (2018). The structure of effective governance of disaster response networks: Insights from the field. American Review of Public Administration, 48, 699–715.
38.
ReichardtJ.BornholdtS. (2006). When are networks truly modular?Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 224, 20–26.
39.
SalathéM.JonesJ. H. (2010). Dynamics and control of diseases in networks with community structure. PloS One, 6, 1–11.
40.
SellT. K.ShearerM. P.MeyerD.ChandlerH.Schoch-SpanaM.ThomasE. … TonerE. (2018). Public health resilience checklist for high-consequence infectious diseases—Informed by the domestic Ebola response in the United States. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 24, 510–518.
41.
SeoK. H.LeeJ. C.KimG. H.LeeE. (2015). Epidemics crisis management systems in South Korea. Chung-ang Public Administration Review, 29, 219–242.
42.
SilkB. J. (2018). Infectious disease threats and opportunities for prevention. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 24, 503–505.
43.
SpiroE. S.ActonR. M.ButtsC. T. (2013). Extended structures of mediation: Re-examining brokerage in dynamic networks. Social Networks, 35, 130–143.
44.
SwaanC. M.ÖryA. V.ScholL. G. C.JacobiA.RichardusJ. H.TimenA. (2018). Ebola Preparedness in the Netherlands: The Need for Coordination between the Public Health and the Curative Sector. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 24, 18–25.
45.
TangP.DengC.ShaoS.ShenG. Q. (2017). Leveraging intergovernmental and cross-sectoral networks to manage nuclear power plant accidents: A case study from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1551–1566.
46.
TraagV.WaltmanL.van EckN. J. (2018). From Louvain to Leiden: Guaranteeing well-connected communities. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/arXiv:1810.08473v1
47.
TylerJ.WilkinsonD.HubermanB. (2005). E-mail as spectroscopy: Automated discovery of community structure within organizations. The Information Society, 21, 81–96.
48.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49.
WaughW. (2003). Terrorism, Homeland Security and the National Emergency Management Network. Public Organization Review, 3, 373–385.
50.
WilkinsonD. M.HubermanB. A. (2004). A method for finding communities of related genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 5241–5248.
51.
WilliamsH. A.DunvilleR. L.GerberS. I.ErdmanD. D.PesikN.KuharD.,…MERS-CoV Working Group. (2015). CDC’s early response to a novel viral disease, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV), September 2012-May2014. Public Health Reports, 130, 307–317.
52.
YangJ.LeskovecJ. (2014). Structure and overlaps of communities in networks. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 5, ArticleNo.26. Retrieved fromhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1205.6228
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
