How Internet Content Mobilizes Protests: The Case of Two Anti-Government Protests in Korea

Abstract

This study enhances our understanding of the interplay between Internet content and protests. Utilizing 47 in-depth interviews conducted during two mass protests in South Korea, the study investigated how Internet content affects the mobilization of people and if or how the emergence of social networking sites (SNSs) has changed Internet use. Applying qualitative methods, it revealed that the Internet helps mobilize protests by providing a space for reproduced and affective content and exposing people to multiple perspectives against which they can test the legitimacy of their personal beliefs. The study showed that, unlike the Internet, SNSs are less-than-ideal tools for political participation. By focusing on Internet content and examining the use and perception of the Internet in two protests separated by an 8-year interval, this study makes unique contributions in the realm of the Internet and mobilization.

Keywords

anti-government protest mobilization Internet social networking sites online content

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Associated Press. (2008, May 26). South Koreans hold candlelight vigil protesting beef import deal with U.S. Fox News. Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/story/2008/05/26/south-koreans-hold-candlelight-vigil-protesting-beef-import-deal-with-us.html

Bennett

W. L.

Iyengar

(2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707–731.

Bennett

W. L.

Segerberg

(2011). Digital media and the personalization of collective action: Social technology and the organization of protests against the global economic crisis. Information, Communication & Society, 14, 770–799. doi:10.1080/ 1369118X.2011.579141

Chaiken

(1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752.

Chang

W.--y.

Park

H. W.

(2012). The network structure of the Korean blogosphere. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 216–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01567.x

Choi

Kim

(2016, November 15). One million protesters storm Seoul’s streets, demanding Park’s resignation. The Korea Times. Retrieved from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2016/11/116_218065.html#

Christensen

H. S.

(2011, February). Political activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means? First Monday, 16. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/3336/2767

Dahlberg

(2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4, 615–633. doi:10.1080/13691180110097030

Dahlgren

(2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22, 147–162. doi:10.1080/10584600590933160

10.

Dimitrova

D. V.

Shehata

Strömbäck

Nord

L. W.

(2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41, 95–118.

11.

Draudt

(2017, March 14). The future of South Korean democracy. The Diplomat. Retrieved from http://thediplomat.com/2017/03/the-future-of-south-korean-democracy/

12.

Gaines

B. J.

Mondak

J. J.

(2009). Typing together? Clustering of ideological types in online social networks. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6, 216–231.

13.

Gil de Zúñiga

Valenzuela

(2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38, 397–421. doi:10.1177/0093650210384984

14.

Gladwell

(2010, October 4). Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic980025.files/Wk%2011_Nov%2011th/Gladwell_2010_Small_Change.pdf

15.

Glaser

Strauss

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: de Gruyter.

16.

Gleason

(2013). # Occupy Wall Street: Exploring informal learning about a social movement on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 966–982. doi:10.1177/000276421347937

17.

Griffiths

(2017, March 31). South Korea presidential scandal: What you need to know. CNN. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/02/asia/south-korea-president-scandal-explained/

18.

Harlow

Guo

(2014). Will the revolution be tweeted or Facebooked? Using digital communication tools in immigrant activism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 463–478. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01626.x

19.

Hilbert

Vásquez

Halpern

Valenzuela

Arriagada

(2017). One step, two step, network step? Complementary perspectives on communication flows in Twittered citizen protests. Social Science Computer Review, 35, 444–461.

20.

Howard

P. N.

Hussain

M. M.

(2013). Democracy’s fourth wave? Digital media and the Arab Spring. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

21.

Howard

P. N.

Parks

M. R.

(2012). Social media and political change: Capacity, constraint, and consequence. Journal of Communication, 62, 359–362. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01626.x

22.

Johnson

P. R.

(2014). Toward a uses and gratification’s model of Twitter (master’s thesis). Syracuse University. Retrieved from https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1057&context=thesis

23.

Joo

Jung

Kim

(2016). 2016 Korean media panel survey. Retrieved from http://www.kisdi.re.kr/kisdi/fp/kr/board/selectSingleBoard.do?cmd=selectSingleBoard&boardId=GPK_RND_DATA&seq=32335&reStep=&ctx=

24.

Khamis

Vaughn

(2011). Cyberactivism in the Egyptian revolution: How civic engagement & citizen journalism tilted the balance. Arab Media and Society. Retrieved from http://www.arabmediasociety.com/?article=769

25.

Kim

B.-K.

(2009, April 30). [Section 1. Introspection and evaluation of candlelight] 2008 candlelight vigil and MBnomix. The Kyunghyang Shinmun. Retrieved from http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=200904301438571&code=940100

26.

Kim

Park

Bang

(2016, December 11). With impeachment passed, more than 1 million still gather for candlelight demonstrations. The Hankyoreh. Retrieved from http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/774139.html

27.

Koc-Michalska

Lilleker

(2017). Digital politics: Mobilization, engagement, and participation. Political Communication, 34, 1–5. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1243178

28.

Korea Information Society Development Institute. (n.d.). Media usage patterns—Email SNS use. Retrieved from http://stat.kisdi.re.kr/MediaPanel/MediaPanel.aspx?tablename=TBR_B_NETWORK

29.

Lazarsfeld

Berelson

Gaudet

(1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Duel, Sloan & Pearce.

30.

Lee

F. L.

Chan

J. M.

(2016). Digital media activities and mode of participation in a protest campaign: A study of the Umbrella Movement. Information, Communication & Society, 19, 4–22.

31.

Lee

S. O.

Kim

S. J.

Wainwright

(2010). Mad cow militancy: Neoliberal hegemony and social resistance in South Korea. Political Geography, 29, 359–369.

32.

Lim

(2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 62, 231–248. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01628.x

33.

Lohmann

(1994). The dynamics of informational cascades: The Monday demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91. World Politics, 47, 42–101.

34.

Lynch

(2011). After Egypt: The limits and promise of online challenges to the authoritarian Arab state. Perspectives on Politics, 9, 301–310. doi:10.1017/S1537592711000910

35.

McLuhan

(1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

36.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

37.

Morozov

(2009). The brave new world of slacktivism. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/05/19/the-brave-new-world-of-slacktivism/

38.

Morrell

M. E.

(2003). Survey and experimental evidence for a reliable and valid measure of internal political efficacy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 589–602.

39.

National Internet Development Agency of Korea. (2008a). Survey on the Internet usage: Executive summary. Retrieved from https://isis.kisa.or.kr/board/index.jsp?pageId=060100&bbsId=7&itemId=721&searchKey=&searchTxt=&pageIndex=8

40.

National Internet Development Agency of Korea. (2008b). 2008 survey on the wireless Internet use: Executive summary. Retrieved from https://isis.kisa.or.kr/board/index.jsp?pageId=060100&bbsId=7&itemId=722&searchKey=&searchTxt=&pageIndex=8

41.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). Fixed and wireless broadband subscriptions per 100 inhabitants. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/broadband/oecdbroadbandportal.htm

42.

Papacharissi

(2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4, 9–27. doi:10.1177/14614440222226244

43.

Papacharissi

(2009). The virtual sphere 2.0: The Internet, the public sphere, and beyond. In Chadwick

Howard

P. N.

(Eds.), Routledge handbook of Internet politics (pp. 230–245). Abingdon, England: Routledge.

44.

Papacharissi

Oliveira

(2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on# Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62, 266–282. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x

45.

Penney

(2015). Social media and symbolic action: Exploring participation in the Facebook red equal sign profile picture campaign. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 52–66. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12092

46.

Poushter

(2016). Smartphone ownership and Internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. Retrieved from http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/02/22/smartphone-ownership-and-internet-usage-continues-to-climb-in-emerging-economies/

47.

Rubin

H. J.

Rubin

I. S.

(1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

48.

Shah

D. V.

Cho

Eveland

W. P.

Jr Kwak

(2005). Information and expression in a digital age modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531–565. doi:10.1177/0093650205279209

49.

Shah

D. V.

Cho

Nah

Gotlieb

M. R.

Hwang

Lee

N.-J.

McLeod

D. M.

(2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of Communication, 57, 676–703. doi:10.1111/ j.1460-2466.2007.00363.x

50.

Sheldon

Bryant

(2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89–97.

51.

Slater

M. D.

(2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281–303.

52.

Thorson

(2014). Facing an uncertain reception: Young citizens and political interaction on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 203–216.

53.

Tosun

L. P.

(2012). Motives for Facebook use and expressing “true self” on the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1510–1517.

54.

Tufekci

Wilson

(2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62, 363–379. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x

55.

Valenzuela

(2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior the roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 920–942. doi:10.1177/0002764213479375

56.

Valenzuela

Arriagada

Scherman

(2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62, 299–314. doi:10.1111/ j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x.

57.

Van Laer

Van Aelst

(2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 1146–1171. doi:10.1080/13691181003628307

58.

Vissers

Hooghe

Stolle

Maheo

V. A.

(2012). The impact of mobilization media on off-line and online participation: Are mobilization effects medium-specific? Social Science Computer Review, 30, 152–169.

59.

Vissers

Stolle

(2014). Spill-over effects between Facebook and on/offline political participation? Evidence from a two-wave panel study. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11, 259–275. doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.888383

60.

Vitak

Zube

Smock

Carr

C. T.

Ellison

Lampe

(2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 107–114. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0226

61.

Vraga

E. K.

Thorson

Kligler-Vilenchik

Gee

(2015). How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 281–289.

62.

Weeks

B. E.

Lane

D. S.

Kim

D. H.

Lee

S. S.

Kwak

(2017). Incidental exposure, selective exposure, and political information sharing: Integrating online exposure patterns and expression on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 363–379.

63.

Yin

R. K.

(2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

64.

Youmans

W. L.

York

J. C.

(2012). Social media and the activist toolkit: User agreements, corporate interests, and the information infrastructure of modern social movements. Journal of Communication, 62, 315–329. doi:10.1111/ j.1460-2466.2007.00363.x

65.

Zhu

Skoric

Shen

(2017). I shield myself from thee: Selective avoidance on social media during political protests. Political Communication, 34, 112–131. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1222471