Prior studies have found an inconclusive relationship between social networking site (SNS) usage and users’ subjective well-being. Passive SNS usage may be detrimental to subjective well-being, because it cannot provide social support and may evoke envy and jealousy. Conversely, it is also possible that lower subjective well-being may predict higher passive SNS usage, which can be used as a means to relieve stress. To examine this reciprocal process, a two-wave study among a sample of Chinese college students was conducted (N = 350 at Time 1, 265 at Time 2). Data were analyzed with structural modeling. Cross-lagged analysis indicated that passive SNS usage at Time 1 predicted a decrease in subjective well-being at Time 2. Lower subjective well-being at Time 1 also predicted an increase in passive SNS usage at Time 2. These findings deepen our understanding of the complicated association between SNS usage and well-being and has implications for how to help individuals use SNS healthily.
AppelH.CrusiusJ.GerlachA. L. (2015). Social comparison, envy, and depression on Facebook: A study looking at the effects of high comparison standards on depressed individuals. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34, 277–289.
2.
AppelH.GerlachA. L.CrusiusJ. (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 44–49.
3.
BianM.LeungL. (2015). Linking loneliness, shyness, smartphone adddiction symptoms, and patterns of smartphone use to social capital. Social Science Computer Review, 33, 61–79.
4.
BoydD. (2006). Friends, friendsters, and MySpace Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11, 1–15.
5.
BurkeM.MarlowC.LentoT. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, USA. ACM Press.
6.
ByrneB. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
CeyhanA. A.CeyhanE. (2008). Loneliness, depression, and computer self-efficacy as predictors of problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 699–701.
8.
ChangC.-W.HeoJ. (2014). Visiting theories that predict college students’ self-disclosure on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 79–86.
9.
ChenW.FanC.-Y.LiuQ.-X.ZhouZ.-K.XieX.-C. (2016). Passive social network site use and subjective well-being: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 507–514.
10.
ChouH.-T. G.EdgeN. (2012). “They are happier and having better lives than I am”: The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 117–121.
11.
ClaytonR. B.OsborneR. E.MillerB. K.OberleC. D. (2013). Loneliness, anxiousness, and substance use as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 687–693.
12.
de VriesD. A.KühneR. (2015). Facebook and self-perception: Individual susceptibility to negative social comparison on Facebook. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 217–221.
13.
DienerE.EmmonsR. a.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 28, 489–491.
14.
FardoulyJ.DiedrichsP. C.VartanianL. R.HalliwellE. (2015). Social comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women’s body image concerns and mood. Body Image, 13, 38–45.
15.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
FrisonE.EggermontS. (2015). Exploring the relationships between different types of Facebook use, perceived online social support, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Social Science Computer Review, 34, 153–171.
17.
FrisonE.EggermontS. (2016). “Harder, better, faster, stronger”: Negative comparison on Facebook and adolescents’ life satisfaction are reciprocally related. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19, 158–164.
18.
HaferkampN.KrämerN. C. (2011). Social comparison 2.0: Examining the effects of online profiles on social-networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 309–314.
19.
HawkS. T. (2014). Cross-cultural and cross-platform differences in youths’ social networking site behavior. Adolescent Medicine: State of the Art Reviews, 25, 533–541.
20.
HouX.WangH.GuoC.GaskinJ.RostD. H.WangJ. (2017). Psychological resilience can help combat the effect of stress on problematic social networking site usage. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 61–66.
21.
JacksonL.WangJ. (2013). Cultural differences in social networking site use: A comparative study of China and the United States. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 910–921.
22.
JordanA. H.MoninB.DweckC. S.LovettB. J.JohnO. P.GrossJ. J. (2011). Misery has more company than people think: Underestimating the prevalence of others’ negative emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 120–135.
23.
KalpidouM.CostinD.MorrisJ. (2011). The relationship between Facebook and the well-being of undergraduate college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14, 183–189.
24.
Kardefelt-WintherD. (2014). A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 351–354.
25.
KatzE.BlumlerJ. G.GurevitchM. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In BlumlerJ. G.KatzE. (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
KimY.SohnD.ChoiS. M. (2011). Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 365–372.
27.
KorolevaK.VeltriN.KrasnovaH.GüntherO. (2011). It’s all about networking! Empirical investigation of social capital formation on social network sites. International Conference Information Systems, ICIS (AIS, Atlanta), Paper 24, Shanghai, China. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).
28.
KrasnovaH.WidjajaT.BuxmannP.WenningerH.BenbasatI. (2015). Why following friends can hurt you: An exploratory investigation of the efffects of envy on social networking sites among college-age users college-age users. Information Systems Research, 26, 585–605.
29.
LeeS. Y. (2014). How do people compare themselves with others on social network sites?: The case of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 253–260.
30.
Lee-WonR. J.ShimM.JooY. K.ParkS. G. (2014). Who puts the best “face” forward on Facebook?: Positive self-presentation in online social networking and the role of self-consciousness, actual-to-total Friends ratio, and culture. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 413–423.
31.
LeungL. (2007). Stressful life events, motives for Internet use, and social support among digital kids. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 204–214.
32.
LimM.YangY. (2015). Effects of users’ envy and shame on social comparison that occurs on social network services. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 300–311.
33.
LupK.TrubL.RosenthalL. (2015). Instagram #Instasad?: Exploring associations among Instagram use, depressive symptoms, negative social comparison, and strangers followed. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 247–252.
34.
MaierC.LaumerS.EckhardtA.WeitzelT. (2012). When social networking turns to social overload: Explaining the stress, emotional exhaustion, and quitting behavior from social network sites’ users. In ECIS 2012—Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 1–12. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).
35.
MuiseA.ChristofidesE.DesmaraisS. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy?Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 441–444.
36.
NadkarniA.HofmannS. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook?Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 243–249.
37.
OhH. J.OzkayaE.LaRoseR. (2014). How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 69–78.
38.
OrchardL. J.FullwoodC.GalbraithN.MorrisN. (2014). Individual differences as predictors of social networking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 388–402.
39.
PanticI. (2014). Online social networking and mental health. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 17, 652–657.
40.
ParkN.KeeK. F.ValenzuelaS. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 729–733.
41.
PempekT. B.YermolayevaY. B.CalvertS. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227–238.
42.
PfeilU.ArjanR.ZaphirisP. (2009). Age differences in online social networking—A study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 643–654.
43.
SagioglouC.GreitemeyerT. (2014). Facebook’s emotional consequences: Why Facebook causes a decrease in mood and why people still use it. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 359–363.
44.
SalisburyW.ChinW. W.GopalA.NewstedP. R. (2002). Research report: Better theory through measurement—Developing a scale to capture consensus on appropriation. Information System Research, 13, 91–103.
45.
ShawA. M.TimpanoK. R.TranT. B.JoormannJ. (2015). Correlates of Facebook usage patterns: The relationship between passive Facebook use, social anxiety symptoms, and brooding. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 575–580.
46.
SheldonK.M.ElliotA. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 482–497.
47.
SheldonP. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness to communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20, 67–75.
48.
SmithR. H.KimS. H. (2007). Comprehending envy. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 46–64.
49.
SmockA. D.EllisonN. B.LampeC.WohnD. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2322–2329.
50.
SongH.Zmyslinski-SeeligA.KimJ.DrentA.VictorA.OmoriK.AllenM. (2014). Does Facebook make you lonely?: A meta analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 446–452.
51.
ValenzuelaS.ParkN.KeeK. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875–901.
52.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ.SchoutenA. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 584–590.
53.
VerduynP.LeeD. S.ParkJ.ShablackH.OrvellA.BayerJ.KrossE. (2015). Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 144, 480–488.
54.
VogelE. A.RoseJ. P.RobertsL. R.EcklesK. (2014). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3, 206–222.
55.
WangJ.-L.GaskinJ.WangH.-Z.LiuD. (2016). Life satisfaction moderates the associations between motives and excessive social networking site usage. Addiction Research & Theory, 24, 450–457.
56.
WangJ.-L.JacksonL. A.GaskinJ.WangH.-Z. (2014). The effects of Social Networking Site (SNS) use on college students’ friendship and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 229–236.
57.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
58.
WeiserE. B. (2001). The functions of Internet use and their social and psychological consequences. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4, 723–743.
59.
ZillmannD.BryantJ. (1985). Selective exposure to communication. In Cognitive dissonance in selective exposure (pp. 11–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associaltes.
