Facebook is expected to facilitate more equal participation in civic engagement across genders and countries. With the use of a big data tool (Wisdom), we explored gender disparities in various Facebook liking practices concerning expressions of civic engagement among 21,706,806 Facebook users in 10 countries across Asia, Africa, the Americas, and Europe. We observed distinct patterns with regard to civic and political expressions on Facebook, with males drawn more toward politically and information-oriented liking practices when compared to females. Moreover, females (aged 13–28 years) in Europe and the Americas are more likely than males to support humanitarian aid and environmental issues on Facebook. This latter finding was not evident in Asia and Africa, where males are more active in liking all forms of civic expressions on Facebook. In conclusion, this study shows that the gender differences in civic engagement that exist offline to a large degree are replicated and reinforced on Facebook.
AliA. H. (2011). Power of social media in developing nations: New tools for closing the global digital divide and beyond. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 24, 185–212.
BaronN. S.CampbellE. M. (2012). Gender and mobile phones in cross-national context. Language Sciences, 34, 13–27.
5.
BaumgartnerJ. C.MorrisJ. S. (2010). MyFaceTube politics social networking web sites and political engagement of young adults. Social Science Computer Review, 28, 24–44.
6.
BennettW. L. (2012). The personalization of politics and political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 20–39.
7.
BennettW. L.WellsC.FreelonD. (2011). Communicating civic engagement: Contrasting models of citizenship in the youth web sphere. Journal of Communication, 61, 835–856.
8.
BoydD.CrawfordK. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication and Society, 15, 662–679.
9.
BrandtzaegP. B. (2012). Social networking sites: Their users and social implications—A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 467–488.
10.
BrandtzaegP. B.FølstadA.MainsahH. (2012). Designing for youth civic engagement in social media. In KommersP.IsaíasP.BessisN. (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS Web Based Communities and Social Media (WBC 2012), Conference (pp. 33–43). Lisbon, Portugal: IADIS Press.
11.
BrandtzaegP. B.HaugestveitI. M. (2014). Facebook likes: A study of liking practices for humanitarian causes. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 10, 258–279.
12.
BrandtzaegP. B.HeimJ.KarahasanovicA. (2011). Understanding the new digital divide—A typology of Internet users in Europe. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69, 123–138.
ChanD. K. S.ChengG. H. L. (2004). A comparison of offline and online friendship qualities at different stages of relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 305–320.
CicognaniE.ZaniB.FournierB.GavrayC.BornM. (2012). Gender differences in youths’ political engagement and participation. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 561–576.
Gil de ZúñigaH.JungN.ValenzuelaS. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319–336. Retrieved fromhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x/full
25.
Gil de ZúñigaH.MolyneuxL.ZhengP. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication, 64, 612–634.
26.
GrimesD. A.SchulzK. F. (2002). Descriptive studies: What they can and cannot do. The Lancet, 359, 145–149.
HajinejadM. (2013). Visual self-presentation of Iranian youth on Facebook profile pictures. Paper presented at Youth 2.0 International Workshop, Antwerp, Belgium.
29.
HaleS. A.MargettsH.YasseriT. (2013). Petition growth and success rates on the UK No. 10 Downing Street Website. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference (pp. 132–138). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved fromhttp://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2464518
30.
HargittaiE. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation.”Sociological Inquiry, 80, 92–113.
31.
HargittaiE.ShaferS. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 432–448.
32.
HargittaiE.ShawA. (2013). Digitally savvy citizenship: The role of Internet skills and engagement in young adults’ political participation around the 2008 presidential election. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 115–134.
33.
HerringS. C. (2003). Gender and power in on-line communication. In HolmesJ.MeyerhoffM. (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 202–228). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
34.
HoogheM.StolleD. (2004). Good girls go to the polling booth, bad boys go everywhere: Gender differences in anticipated political participation among American fourteen-year-olds. Women & Politics, 26, 1–23.
35.
InglehartR.NorrisP. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36.
IskanderE. (2011). Connecting the national and the virtual: Can Facebook activism remain relevant after Egypt’s January 25 uprising?International Journal of Communication, 5, 13–15.
37.
JugertP.EcksteinK.NoackP.KuhnA.BenbowA. (2013). Offline and online civic engagement among adolescents and young adults from three ethnic groups. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 123–135.
38.
KennedyT.WellmanB.KlementK. (2003). Gendering the digital divide. It & Society, 1, 72–96.
39.
KohnM. L. (1989). Cross-national research in sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
KollockP. (1999). The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In SmithP. (Ed.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 220–239). London, England: Routledge.
41.
KosinskiM.StillwellD.GraepelT. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 5802–5805. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pnas.org/content/110/15/5802.short
LivingstoneS.BoberM.HelsperE. J. (2005). Active participation or just more information? Young people’s take-up of opportunities to act and interact on the Internet. Information, Community & Society, 8, 287–314.
44.
MathwickC. (2002). Understanding the online consumer: A typology of online relational norms. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16, 40–55.
45.
MoeH.LarssonA. O. (2013). Untangling a complex media system. A comparative study of Twitter linking practices during three Scandinavian election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society, 16, 775–794.
46.
MorozovE. (2011). The net delusion: How not to liberate the world. London, England: Penguin.
47.
NorrisP. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
48.
PaxtonP.KunovichS.HughesM. M. (2007). Gender in politics. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 263–284.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
52.
Quan-HaaseA.WellmanB. (2004). How does the Internet affect social capital?Social Capital and Information Technology, 113, 135–113.
53.
Quan-HaaseA.YoungA. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 30, 350–361.
SmithB. G.GallicanoT. D. (2015). Terms of engagement: Analyzing public engagement with organizations through social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 82–90.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797.
ValenzuelaS.ParkN.KeeK. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875–901. Retrieved fromhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x/full
63.
VerbaS.BurnsN.Lehman SchlozmanK. (1997). Knowing and caring about politics: Gender and political engagement. Journal of Politics, 59, 1055–1072.
64.
VitakJ.ZubeP.SmockA.CarrC. T.EllisonN.LampeC. (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 107–114.
65.
WangY. C.BurkeM.KrautR. E. (2013). Gender, topic, and audience response: An analysis of user-generated content on Facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 31–34). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved fromhttp://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2470659
66.
WarrenA. M.SulaimanA.JaafarN. I. (2014). Facebook: The enabler of online civic engagement for activists. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 284–289.
67.
WellmanB.Quan-HaaseA.WitteJ. C.HamptonK. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 437–456.
68.
WilliamsJ. E.BestD. L. (1990). Sex and psyche: Gender and self-viewed cross-culturally. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
69.
WilliamsJ. E.SatterwhiteR. C.BestD. L. (1999). Pancultural gender stereotypes revisited. Sex Roles, 40, 513–525.
XenosM.VromenA.LoaderB. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 151–167.
72.
YooS. W.Gil de ZúñigaH. (2014). Connecting blog, Twitter and Facebook use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Communication & Society, 27, 33–48.
