This study investigated how messaging app Line’s character sticker use may contribute to the perception of intimate experience and enhance relationship satisfaction in both positive and negative emotion situations. A 2 (situation valence: positive emotion and negative emotion) × 3 (response style: text, sticker, and text and sticker) × 3 (scenario: career, romance, and education) mixed design, with situation valence and response style between-subjects variables and scenario a within-subjects variable, was employed. The results revealed the combination of a text and sticker response to a partner’s disclosure can produce the highest level of intimate experience, followed by text- and sticker-only responses. It further suggests that the cartoon-like Line sticker may better convey positive than negative emotions because the detailed illustration is more similar to real-life nonverbal behavior expressing humor and happiness and that may facilitate imagined closeness between communication partners when moving through space. The hyperpersonal affordance of text-based messages to foster relationship may be further distinguished between the cognitive and the affective levels in the messaging app context.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103, 411.
2.
AndersenP. A. (1998). The cognitive valence theory of intimate communication. In PalmerM.BarnettG. A. (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 39–72). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3.
AndersenP. A.GuerreroL. K.JonesS. M. (2006). Nonverbal behavior in intimate interactions and intimate relationships. In ManusovV.PattersonM. L. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 259–277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
AndersonR. E.HairJ. F.TathamR.BlackW. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
5.
AndersonT. L.Emmers-SommerT. M. (2006). Predictors of relationship satisfaction in online romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 57, 153–172.
6.
AntakiC.BarnesR.LeudarI. (2005). Self-disclosure as a situated interactional practice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 181–199.
ArgyleM.DeanJ. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289–304.
9.
AriesE. J.JohnsonF. L. (1983). Close friendship in adulthood: Conversational content between same-sex friends. Sex Roles, 9, 1183–1196.
10.
AronA.AronE. N.NormanC. (2001). Self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. In FletcherG. J. O.ClarkM. S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 478–501). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
11.
AuterP. J. (2007). Portable social groups: Willingness to communicate, interpersonal communication gratifications, and cell phone use among young adults. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 5, 139–156.
12.
BerscheidE.ReisH. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. TLindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 193–281). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
13.
BurlesonB. R. (2003). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10, 1–23.
14.
ColombettiG. (2005). Appraising valence. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12, 8–10.
15.
De GournayC. (2002). Pretense of intimacy in France. In KatzJ. E.AakhusM. A. (Eds.), Perpetual contact (pp. 193–206). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DeenenA.GijsL.Van NaerssenA. (1994). Intimacy and sexuality in gay male couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 421–431.
17.
DerksD.FischerA. H.BosA. E. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 766–785.
18.
DerlegaV. J.MettsS.PetronioS.MargulisS. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
DresnerE.HerringS. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication theory, 20, 249–268.
20.
FalkD. R.WagnerP. N. (1985). Intimacy of self-disclosure and response processes as factors affecting the development of interpersonal relationships. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 557–570.
21.
FloydK.BurgoonJ. K. (1999). Reacting to nonverbal expressions of liking: A test of interaction adaptation theory. Communications Monographs, 66, 219–239.
22.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
23.
FridlundA. J. (1991). Sociality of solitary smiling: Potentiation by an implicit audience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 229.
24.
GableS. L.GonzagaG. C.StrachmanA. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 904.
25.
GableS. L.ReisH. T. (2010). Good news! Capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 195–257.
26.
GreeneJ.BurlesonB. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of communication and social interaction skills. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
GuerreroL. K. (1996). Attachment-style differences in intimacy and involvement: A test of the four-category model. Communications Monographs, 63, 269–292.
28.
GuerreroL. K.FarinelliL.McEwanB. (2009). Attachment and relational satisfaction: The mediating effect of emotional communication. Communication Monographs, 76, 487–514.
29.
HackerH. M. (1981). Blabbermouths and clams: Sex differences in self-disclosure in same-sex and cross-sex friendship dyads. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 385–401.
30.
HarperJ. M.SchaaljeB. G.SandbergJ. G. (2000). Daily hassles, intimacy, and marital quality in later life marriages. American Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 1–18.
31.
HarrisR. B.ParadiceD. (2007). An investigation of the computer-mediated communication of emotions. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3, 2081–2090.
32.
HendrickS. S.DickeA.HendrickC. (1998). The relationship assessment scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 137–142.
IJsselsteijnW.van BarenJ.van LanenF. (2003). Staying in touch: Social presence and connectedness through synchronous and asynchronous communication media. Human-Computer Interaction: Theory and Practice (Part II), 2, 924–928.
37.
JakobsE.MansteadA. S.FischerA. H. (2001). Social context effects on facial activity in a negative emotional setting. Emotion, 1, 51.
38.
JanssenJ. H.IJsselsteijnW. A.WesterinkJ. H. (2014). How affective technologies can influence intimate interactions and improve social connectedness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72, 33–43.
39.
JacksonD. L.GillaspyJ. A.Jr.Purc-StephensonR. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 6.
40.
JiangL.BazarovaN. N.HancockJ. T. (2011). The disclosure–intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: An attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Communication Research, 37, 58–77.
41.
JonesS. M.GuerreroL. K. (2001). The effects of nonverbal immediacy and verbal person centeredness in the emotional support process. Human Communication Research, 27, 567–596.
KatzJ. E.AakhusM. (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44.
KeelanJ. P. R.DionK. K.DionK. L. (1998). Attachment style and relationship satisfaction: Test of a self-disclosure explanation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 30, 24.
45.
KelvinP. (1977). Predictability, power and vulnerability in interpersonal attraction. In DuckS. (Ed.), Theory and practice in interpersonal attraction (pp. 355–378). London, England: Academic Press.
KuwabaraK.WatanabeT.OhguroT.ItohY.MaedaY. (2002). Connectedness oriented communication: Fostering a sense of connectedness to augment social relationships. Paper presented at the Applications and the Internet, 2002 (SAINT 2002). In Proceeding 2002 Symposium on Applications and the Internet, IEEE Press, 186–193.
48.
LambertN. M.GwinnA. M.BaumeisterR. F.StrachmanA.WashburnI. J.GableS. L.FinchamF. D. (2013). A boost of positive affect: The perks of sharing positive experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 24–43.
49.
LeungL. (2007). Unwillingness-to-communicate and college students’ motives in SMS mobile messaging. Telematics and Informatics, 24, 115–129.
50.
LevingerG.SennD. J. (1967). Disclosure of feelings in marriage. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 13, 237–249.
51.
LoS. K. (2008). The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 595–597.
52.
MackeyR. A.DiemerM. A.O’BrienB. A. (2000). Psychological intimacy in the lasting relationships of heterosexual and same-gender couples. Sex Roles, 43, 201–227.
PragerK. J. (1997). The psychology of intimacy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
55.
PragerK. J. (2009). Intimacy. In ReisH. T.SprecherS.SprecherS. K. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships (Vol. 1, pp. 919–923). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
ReisH. T.CollinsN. (2000). Measuring relationship properties and interactions relevant to social support. In CohenS.UnderwoodL. G.GottliebB. H. (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 136–192). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
57.
ReisH. T.PatrickB. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 523–563). New York, NY: Guilford.
58.
ReisH. T.ShaverP. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In DuckS. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–389). Chichester, England: John Wiley.
59.
RezabekL. L.CochenourJ. J. (1998). Visual cues in computer-mediated communication: Supplementing text with emoticons. Journal of Visual Literacy, 18, 201–215.
60.
RubinL. B. (1983). Intimate strangers: Men and women together. New York: Harper & Row.
61.
RumelhartD. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In SpiroR. J.BruceB. C.BrewerW. F. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62.
RusbultC. E.BuunkB. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175–204.
63.
SchaeferM. T.OlsonD. H. (1981). Assessing intimacy: The pair inventory*. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7, 47–60.
64.
SchreiberJ. B.NoraA.StageF. K.BarlowE. A.KingJ. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–338.
65.
ShortJ.WilliamsE.ChristieB. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, England: John Wiley.
66.
TongS. T.WaltherJ. B. (2011). Relational maintenance and CMC. In WrightK. B.WebbL. M. (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 98–118). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
67.
TossellC. C.KortumP.ShepardC.Barg-WalkowL. H.RahmatiA.ZhongL. (2012). A longitudinal study of emoticon use in text messaging from smartphones. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 659–663.
68.
TurkleS. (2012). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
69.
WaltherJ. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43.
70.
WaltherJ. B.D’AddarioK. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 324–347.
71.
WangS. S. (2013). “I Share, Therefore I Am”: Personality Traits, Life Satisfaction, and Facebook Check-Ins. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 870–877.
72.
WeberK.JohnsonA.CorriganM. (2004). Communicating emotional support and its relationship to feelings of being understood, trust, and self-disclosure. Communication Research Reports, 21, 316–323.
73.
WeiR.LoV.-H. (2006). Staying connected while on the move cell phone use and social connectedness. New Media & Society, 8, 53–72.
74.
WienerM.MehrabianA. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York, NY: Ardent Media.
75.
WuL.-L.LuH.-P.TaoY.-H. (2010). The effect of emoticons in simplex and complex task-oriented communication: An empirical study of instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 889–895.
