The rise of social media, such as blogs, social network sites, Twitter, and YouTube, encourages hope for renewed confidence in the government and news media because these venues connect users directly to candidates and officeholders. This article indicates that blogs most heavily relied on the type of social media for political information. Moreover, reliance on blogs and YouTube leads to reduced confidence in the presidency, Congress, and the news media, but reliance on social network sites and Twitter leads to higher confidence in these institutions after controlling for strength of party ties, political ideology, political interest, reliance on traditional media, and demographic variables.
AgrifoglioR.BlackS.MetalloC. (2010). Twitter acceptance: The role of intrinsic motivations. Proceedings of ALPIS. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 10. Retrieved fromhttp://sprouts.aisnet.org/10-9
2.
AndersonC. J.JustA. (2013). Legitimacy from above: The Partisan foundations of support for the political system in democracies. European Political Science Review, 5, 335–362.
BabbieE. (2002). The basics of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5.
Ball-RokeachS. J. (1985). The origins of individual media-system dependency: A sociological framework. Communication Research, 12, 485–510.
6.
Ball-RokeachS. J. (1998). A theory of media power and a theory of media use: Different stories, questions, and ways of thinking. Mass Communication & Society, 1, 5–40.
7.
BaumgartnerJ. C.MorrisJ. S. (2010). MyFaceTube politics: Social networking web sites and political engagement of young adults. Social Science Computer Review, 28, 2–44.
8.
BeaudoinC. E.ThorsonE. (2004). Testing the cognitive mediation model: The roles of news reliance and three gratifications. Communication Research, 31, 446–471.
9.
BekafigoM. A.McBrideA. (2013). Who tweets about politics? Political participation of Twitter users during the 2011 gubernatorial elections. Social Science Computer Review, 31, 625–643.
10.
BennettS. E.RhineS. L.FlickingerR. S. (2001). Assessing Americans’ opinions about the news media’s fairness in 1996 and 1998. Political Communication, 18, 163–182.
11.
BennettS. E.RhineS. L.FlickingerR. S.BennettL. M. (1999). “Video malaise” revisited: Public trust in media and government. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 4, 8–23.
12.
BoydD. M.EllisonN. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.
13.
BoyleT. P. (2001, August). Web and traditional media use in the 2000 presidential election. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism & Mass Communication, Washington, DC.
CatterbergG.MorenoA. (2005). The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Public Opinion Research, 18, 31–48.
18.
ChangL.KrosnickJ. A. (2009). National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the Internet. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 641–678.
19.
ChanleyV. A.RudolphT. J.RahnW. M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 239–256.
20.
CookT. E.GronkeP. (2005). The skeptical American: Revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. Journal of Politics, 67, 784–803.
21.
CorteseJ.ProffittJ. M. (2012). Looking back as we prepare to move forward: U.S. presidential candidates’ adoption of YouTube. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 693–697.
22.
CozmaR.PostelnicuM. (2008, August). Campaigning on social networks: The effects of visiting MySpace profiles of political candidates. Presented to the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism & Mass Communication, Chicago, IL.
23.
CraigS. C. (1993). The malevolent leaders: Popular discontent in America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
24.
DautrichK.HartleyT. H. (1999). How the news media fail American voters: Causes, consequences and remedies. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
25.
DimitrovaD. V.ShehataA.StrombackJ.NordL. W. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41, 95–118.
26.
GraberD. A. (2006). Mass media and American politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
27.
GronkeP.CookT. E. (2007). Disdaining the media: The American public’s changing attitudes toward the news. Political Communication, 24, 259–281.
28.
GueorguievaV. (2007). Voters, MySpace and YouTube: The impact of alternative communication channels on the 2006 election cycle and beyond. Social Science Computer Review, 25, 1–13.
29.
GutmannA.ThompsonD. (2010). The mindset of compromise. Perspectives on Politics, 8, 1125–1143.
30.
GutmannA.ThompsonD. (2012). The spirit of compromise: Why governing demands it and campaigning undermines it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
HetheringtonM. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92, 791–808.
32.
HibbingJ. R.Theiss-MorseE. (1995). Congress as public enemy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33.
HibbingJ. R.Theiss-MorseE. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how democracy should work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
HorsburghS.GoldfinchS.GauldR. (2011). Is public trust in government associated with trust in e-government?Social Science Computer Review, 29, 232–241.
35.
JeffresL. W. (1997). Mass media effects (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
36.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2000a). Democracy’s rebirth or demise? The influence of the Internet on political attitudes. In SchultzD. A. (Ed.), It’s show time! Media, politics, and popular culture (pp. 209–228). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
37.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2000b). Using is believing: The influence of reliance on the credibility of online political information among politically interested Internet users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 865–879.
38.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2002). Webelievability: A path model examining how convenience and reliance predict online credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 619–642.
39.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2004). Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the Internet influence credibility perceptions of weblogs among blog users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 622–642.
40.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2006). Blog day afternoon: Are blogs stealing audiences away from traditional media sources? In BerengerR. (Ed.), Cybermedia go to war (pp. 316–333). Spokane, WA: Marquette Books.
41.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2009). In blog we trust? Deciphering credibility of components of the Internet among politically interested Internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 175–182.
42.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2010). Choosing is believing? How web gratifications and reliance affect Internet credibility among politically interested users. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 18, 1–21.
43.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2012, August). Blinded by the spite? Path model of political attitudes, selectivity, and social media. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism & Mass Communication, Chicago, IL.
44.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2013a). The dark side of the boon? Credibility, selective exposure and the proliferation of online sources of political information. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1862–1871.
45.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2013b). Putting out fire with gasoline: Testing the Gamson hypothesis on media reliance and political activity. Accepted to Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 456–481.
46.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (in press). Credibility of social network sites for political information among politically interested Internet users. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication.
47.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K.BichardS. L.WongW. J. (2007). Every blog has its day: Politically interested Internet users’ perceptions of blog credibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 100–122.
48.
JohnsonT. J.PerlmutterD. (2010). The Facebook election. Mass Communication & Society, 13, 554–559.
49.
JohnsonT. J.ZhangW.BichardS. L. (2011). Voices of convergence or conflict? A path analysis investigation of selective exposure to political web sites. Social Science Computer Review, 29, 449–469.
50.
JonesD. A. (2004). Why Americans don’t trust the media: A preliminary analysis. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9, 60–75.
KaplanA. M.HaenleinM. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68.
53.
KayeB. K. (2007). Web site story: An exploratory study of blog use motivations. In TremayneM. (Ed.), Blogging, citizenship, and the future of media (pp. 127–148). New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
KayeB. K. (2010). Between Barack and a net place: Users and uses of social network sites and blogs for political information. In PapacharissiZ. (Ed.), The networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp. 208–231). New York, NY: Routledge.
55.
KayeB. K.JohnsonT. J. (2006). The age of reasons: Motives for using different components of the Internet for political information. In WilliamsA. P.TedescoJ. C. (Eds.), The Internet election: Perspectives on the role of the web in campaign2004 (pp. 147–167). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
56.
KayeB. K.JohnsonT. J. (2011). Hot Diggity blog: A cluster analysis examining motivations and other factors for why people judge different types of blogs as credible. Mass Communication & Society, 14, 236–263.
57.
KeeterS. (2009). New tricks for old—and new—dogs. In Keynote address to the 31st Annual Research Symposium, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, February 27.
58.
KelseyT. (2010). Social networking spaces: From Facebook to Twitter and everything in between. New York, NY: Apress.
59.
KushinM. J.YamamotoM. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students’ use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication & Society, 13, 608–630.
60.
LawrenceE.SidesJ.FarrellH. (2010). Self-segregation or deliberation? Blog readership, participation, and polarization in American politics. Perspectives on Politics, 8, 141–157.
61.
LeeT. (2010). Why they don’t trust the media: An examination of factors predicting trust. American Behavioral Scientist, 54, 8–21.
62.
LeshnerG.ThorsonE. (2000). Overreporting voting: Campaign media, public mood, and the vote. Political Communication, 17, 263–278.
63.
LeviM. (1988). Of rule and revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
64.
LeviM. (1997). Consent, dissent, and patriotism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
65.
LipsetS. M.SchneiderW. G. (1987). The confidence gap (expanded ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
66.
McAfeeT. (2013). Some of these things are not like the others: Examining motivations and political predispositions among political Facebook activity. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2766–2774.
67.
McLeodJ. M.GlynnC. J.McDonaldD. G. (1983). Issues and images: The influence of media reliance in voting decisions. Communication Research, 10, 37–58.
MillerA. H.ListhaugO. (1999). Political performance and institutional trust. In NorrisP. (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support to democratic governance (pp. 204–217). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
70.
MoyP.PfauM. (2000). With malice toward all. Westport CT: Praeger.
71.
MoyP.PfauM.KahlorL. (1999). Media use and public confidence in democratic institutions. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 137–158.
SunsteinC. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
78.
SweetserK. D.KaidL. L. (2008). Stealth soapboxes: Political information efficacy cynicism and uses of celebrity weblogs among readers, New Media & Society, 10, 67–91.
79.
TolbertC. J.MossbergerK. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66, 354–369.
80.
TownerT. L.DulioD. A. (2011). An experiment of campaign effects during the YouTube Election. New Media & Society, 13, 624–644.
81.
TsfatiY.ArielyG. (2013). Individual and contextual correlates of trust in media across 44 counties. Communication Research. doi:10.1177/0093650213485972
82.
TsfatiY.CohenJ. (2005). Democratic consequences of hostile media perceptions: The case of Gaza settlers. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10, 28–51.
83.
UtzS. (2009). The (potential) benefits of campaigning via social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 227–243.
ZhangW.JohnsonT. J.SeltzerT.BichardS. L. (2010). The revolution will be networked: The influence of social network sites on political attitudes and behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 28, 75–92.
86.
ZhangW.SeltzerT.BichardS. L. (2013). Two sides of the coin: Assessing the influence of social network site use during the 2012 U.S. presidential campaign. Social Science Computer Review, 31, 542–551.
