Expect the Unexpected? Testing for Minimally Counterintuitive (MCI) Bias in the Transmission of Contemporary Legends

Abstract

In this study, we use computational methods for analyzing cultural transmission to examine the role of cognitive selection pressures on the evolution of narratives, the first use of computational phylogenetic analysis in the study of contemporary legends. It has been suggested that a number of biases in transmission may alter the content and structure of narrative so as to maximize how transmittable it is. One bias that has attracted much attention is Boyer’s minimally counterintuitive (MCI) bias, which suggests that a cognitively optimal number of counterintuitive concepts increase the salience and, therefore, the transmission of a narrative. Previous research has used traditional folklore and religious texts to examine this bias and a cognitively optimum number of 1–2 or 2–3 counterintuitive concepts has been suggested. The present research uses the legend of “Bloody Mary,” a contemporary (or urban) legend with MCI elements in a computational phylogenetic analysis to examine the influence of MCI on cultural transmission and evolution. Counterintuitive and intuitive concepts were found to be equally stable in transmission, suggesting that MCI bias may function on the narrative as a whole, rather than individual concepts within it.

Keywords

computational phylogenetic analysis cultural transmission evolution of narratives urban legends

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahrens

Locke

R. J.

Sawyer

(Producers) Stecenko

(Producer & Director) . (2005). The legend of Bloody Mary [Motion picture]. United States: MK4 Productions.

Armitage

(2006). ‘All about Mary’: Children’s use of the toilet ghost story as a mechanism for dealing with fear, but fear of what? Contemporary Legend, 9, 1–27.

Atran

Norenzayan

(2004). Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 713–770.

Barker

Golin

(Producers) Rose

(Director) . (1992). Candyman [Motion picture]. United States: Propaganda Films.

Barrett

J. L.

(2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 29–34.

Barrett

J. L.

(2008). Coding and quantifying counterintuitiveness in religious concepts: Theoretical and methodological reflections. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 20, 308–338.

Barrett

J. L.

Burdett

E. R.

Porter

T. J.

(2009). Counterintuitiveness in folktales: Finding the cognitive optimum. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9, 271–287.

Barrett

J. L.

Nyhof

M. A.

(2001). Spreading of non-natural concepts: The role if intuitive Conceptual structures in memory and transmission of cultural materials. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1, 69–100.

Bartlett

F. C.

(1932). Remembering. Oxford, UK: Macmillan.

10.

Boyer

(1994). The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

11.

Boyer

Ramble

(2001). Cognitive templates for religious concepts: Cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations. Cognitive Science, 25, 535–564.

12.

Brunvand

J. H.

(2000). The truth never stands in the way of a good story. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

13.

Burns

(2009). The poems and songs of Robert Burns: The five foot shelf of classics (Vol. VI). New York, NY: Cossimo, Inc.

14.

Cameron

Dueck

Glazer

Harrison

Howsam

(Producers) Wilson

(Director) . (2007). Dead Mary [Motion picture]. Canada: 235 Films.

15.

Collard

Shennan

S. J.

Tehrani

J. J.

(2006). Branching, blending and the evolution of cultural similarities and differences among human populations. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 169–184.

16.

Dundes

(1998). Bloody Mary in the mirror: A ritual reflection of pre-pubescent anxiety. Western Folklore, 57, 119–135.

17.

Ellis

(2004). Lucifer ascending: The occult in folklore and popular culture. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.

18.

Eriksson

Coultas

J. C.

(2012). The advantage of multiple cultural parents in the cultural transmission of stories. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 33, 251–259.

19.

Farris

J. S.

(1989). The retention index and homoplasy excess. Systematic Zoology, 38, 406–407.

20.

Felsenstein

(1989). PHYLIP - Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics 5: 164–166. Retrieved June 3, 2012, from software homepage: http://evolution.gs.washington.edu/phylip.html)

21.

Fox Tree

J. E.

Weldon

M. S.

(2007). Retelling urban legends. American Journal of Psychology, 120, 459–476.

22.

Heath

Bell

Sternberg

(2001). Emotional selection in memes: The case of urban legends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1028–1041.

23.

Hutton

(2001). Stations of the sun: A history of the ritual year in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

24.

Jones

W. H.

Kropf

L. L.

(1883). Magyar folk-lore and some parallels. The Folklore Journal, 1, 354–362.

25.

Klintberg

(1988). “Black Madame, come out!” On school children and spirits. Arv: Scandanavian Yearbook of Folklore, 44, 155–167.

26.

Knapp

(1976). One potato, two potato. . .. The secret education of American school children. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

27.

Longlois

(1978). Mary Whales, I believe in you: Myth and ritual subdued. Indiana Folklore, 9, 5–33.

28.

Marques

Páez

Valencia

Vincze

(2006). Effects of group membership on the transmission of negative historical events. Psicologia Politica, 32, 79–103.

29.

Merrell

Phillips

Messer

(Producers) Lambert

(Director) (2005). Urban legends: Bloody Mary [Motion picture]. United States: NPP Productions.

30.

Mesoudi

(2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

31.

Miller

T. W.

Tyler

(Producers) Valentine

(Director) (2006). Bloody Mary [Motion picture]. United States: KAT Pictures.

32.

Norenzayan

Atran

Faulkner

Schaller

(2006). Memory and mystery: The cultural selection of minimally counterintuitive narratives. Cognitive Science, 30, 531–553.

33.

Nunn

C. L.

Arnold

Matthews

Borgerhoff Mulder

(2010). Simulating trait evolution for cross-cultural comparison. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 3807–3819.

34.

Ryan

W. F.

Wigzell

(1992). Gullible girls and dreadful dreams. Zhukovski, Pushkin, and popular divination. The Slavonic and East European Review, 70, 647–669.

35.

Swofford

D. L.

(2003). PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. Retrieved June 3, 2012, from http://paup.csit.fsu.edu/

36.

Tangherlini

T. R.

(1990). “It happened not too far from here…”: A survey of legend theory and characterization, Western Folklore, 49, 371–390.

37.

Tucker

(2005). Ghosts in mirrors: Reflections of the self. Journal of American Folklore, 118, 186–203.

38.

Upal

M. A.

(2011). Memory, mystery and coherence: Does the presence of 2-3 counterintuitive concepts predict cultural success of a narrative? Journal of Cognition and Culture, 11, 23–48.

39.

Upal

M. A.

Gonce

L. O.

Tweney

R. D.

Slone

D. J.

(2007). Contextualising counterintuitiveness: How context affects comprehension and memorability of counterintuitive concepts. Cognitive Science, 31, 415–439.