The Internet provides a means to take part in various online activities, for example, leisure activities (e.g., online gaming), social activities (e.g., online chat), and information activities (e.g., online newspapers). Patterns of Internet consumption tend to vary greatly and this is said to be a possible function of personality. Therefore, knowing something about the personalities of those who favor specific activities online may provide a better insight into the motivational factors behind use. This article combines and reviews current literature regarding personality and Internet use, using Eysenck’s three-factor personality theory as a framework of convergence. Although the Internet allows us to play with our identities, it would still seem that online behavior tends to somewhat mimic the behavior expected by one’s off-line personality.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y. ( 2002). Internet and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 1-10.
2.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Ben-Artzi, E. ( 2003). Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 71-80.
3.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Kaplan, M., & Dorpatcheon, N. (2008). Click on the past: The impact of extraversion by users of nostalgic websites on the use of Internet social services. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1907-1912.
4.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. ( 2002). ‘‘On the Internet no one knows I’m an introvert’’: Extroversion, neuroticism, and Internet interaction . CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 125-128.
5.
Amiel, T., & Sargent, S.L. ( 2004). Individual differences in Internet usage motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 711-726.
6.
Anolli, L., Villani, D., & Riva, G. ( 2005). Personality of people using chat: An on-line research . CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8, 89-95.
7.
Armstrong, L., Phillips, J.G., & Saling, L.L. ( 2000). Potential determinants of heavier Internet usage. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 53, 537-550.
8.
Bandura, A. ( 1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184.
9.
Cao, F., & Su, L. ( 2006). Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: Prevalence and psychological features. Child: Care, Health and Development , 33, 275-281.
10.
Caplan, S.E. ( 2002). Problematic Inernet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument . Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 553-575.
11.
Caplan, S.E. ( 2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30, 625-648.
Davis, R.A. ( 2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 187-195.
14.
Draycott, S.G., & Kline, P. ( 1995). The big three or the big five-The EPQ-R vs the NEO-PI: A research note, replication and elaboration. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 801-804.
15.
Ebeling-Witte, S., Frank, M.L., & Lester, D. ( 2007). Shyness, Internet use and personality. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 713-716.
16.
Eighmey, J., & McCord, L. (1998). Adding value in the information age: Uses and gratifications of sites on the World Wide Web. Journal of Business Research, 41, 187-194.
17.
Eysenck, H.J. ( 1990). Biological dimensions of personality. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 244-276). New York: Guilford.
18.
Eysenck, H.J., & Eysenck, S.B.G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
19.
Eysenck, H.J., & Eysenck, S.B.G. (1991). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Scales. London: Hodder and Stoughton .
20.
Eysenck, S.B.G., Eysenck, H.J., & Barrett, P. ( 1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21-29.
Furnham, A., & Heaven, P. ( 1999). Personality and social behaviour. London: Arnold.
23.
Giles, D. ( 2003). Media psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24.
Goby, V.P. ( 2006). Personality and online/offline choices: MBTI profiles and favored communication modes in a Singapore study. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 5-13.
25.
Guadagno, R.E., Okdie, B.M., & Eno, C.A. ( 2008). Who blogs? Personality predictors of blogging. Computers in human Behavior, 24, 1993-2004.
26.
Guilford, J.P. ( 1975). Factors and factors of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 802-814.
27.
Hamburger, Y.A., & Ben-Artzi, E. ( 2000). The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 441-449.
28.
Heitner, E. ( 2003). The relationship between use of the Internet and social development in adolescence. Dissertation Abstracts International , 63, 4371.
29.
Herring, S.C., Scheidt, L.A., Bonus, S., & Wright, E. ( 2004). Bridging the gap: A genre analysis of weblogs. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37) . Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE. Retrieved February 23, 2009, from http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2004/2056/04/205640101b.pdf
30.
Hillan, J. ( 2003). Physician use of patient-centred weblogs and online journals . Clinical Medicine & Research, 1, 333-335.
31.
Hills, P., & Argyle, M. ( 2003). Use of the Internet and their relationships with individual differences in personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 59-70.
Jackson, L.A., von Eye, A., Biocca, F.A., Barbatsis, G., Fitzgerald, H.E., & Zhao, Y. ( 2003). Personality, cognitive style, demographic characteristics and Internet use-Findings from the HomeNetToo project. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62, 79-90.
34.
John, O.P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 102-32). New York: The Guilford Press.
35.
Katz, E., Blumler, J.G., & Gurevitch, M. ( 1974). Utilisation of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communication: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19-32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
36.
Kraut, R., Kielser, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. ( 2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49-74.
37.
Landers, R.N., & Lounsbury, J.W. (2006). An investigation of big five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 283-293.
38.
LaRose, R., & Eastin, M.S. ( 2004). A social cognitive theory of Internet uses and gratifications: Towards a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 358-377.
39.
LaRose, R., Mastro, D., & Eastin, M.S. ( 2001). Understanding Internet usage: A social cognitive approach to Uses and Gratifications. Social Science Computer Review , 19, 359-413.
40.
Leavy, R.L. ( 1983). Social support and psychological disorder: A review. Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 3-21.
41.
Lu, H.Y., Palmgreen, P.C., Zimmerman, R.S., Lane, D.R., & Alexander, L.J. (2006). Personality traits as predictors of intentions to seek online information about STDs and HIV/AIDS among junior and senior college students in Taiwan. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 577-583.
42.
Maldonado, J.G., Mora, M., García, S., & Edipo, P. ( 2001). Personality, sex and computer-mediated communication through the Internet. Anuario de Psicologia, 32, 51-62.
43.
McKenna, K.Y.A., & Bargh, J. ( 2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the ‘‘true self’’ on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 33-48.
44.
Myers, I.B., McCauley, M.H., Quenk, N.L., & Hammer, A.L. ( 1998). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
45.
Nithya, H.M., & Julius, S. ( 2007). Extroversion, neuroticism and self-concept: Their impact on Internet users in India. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1322-1328.
46.
Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A.M. ( 2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 175-196.
47.
Peris, R., Gimeno, M.A., Pinazo, D., Ortet, G., Carrero, V., Sanchiz, M., et al. (2002). Online chat rooms: Virtual spaces of interaction for socially oriented people. CyberPsychology & Behavior , 5, 431-451.
48.
Plickert, G., Côté, R.R., & Wellman, B. ( 2007). It’s not who you know, it’s how you know them: Who exchanges what with whom? Social Networks, 29, 405-429.
49.
Saggino, A. ( 2000). The big three or the big five? A replication study. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 879-886.
50.
Shepherd, A., & Bryson, I. ( 2007). Household and individual use of the Internet. Focus on the digital age (chap. 2). Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_compendia/foda2007/Chapter2.pdf
51.
Suler, J. ( 2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 321-326.
52.
Swickert, R.J., Hittner, J.B., Harris, J.L., & Herring, J.A. ( 2002). Relationships among Internet use, personality and social support. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 437-451.
53.
Tapscott, D. ( 1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
54.
Teng, C. ( 2008). Personality differences between online game players and nonplayers in a student sample. CyberPsychology & Behavior , 11, 232-234.
55.
Tuten, T.L., & Bosnjak, M. ( 2001). Understanding differences in web usage: The role of need for cognition and the five factor model of personality. Social Behavior and Personality, 29, 391-398.
56.
Weaver, J.B. ( 2000). Personality and entertainment preferences. In D. Zillermann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment (pp. 235-248). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
57.
Wolfradt, U., & Doll, J. ( 2001). Motives of adolescents to use the Internet as a function of personality traits, personal and social factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, 13-27.
58.
Young, K.S. ( 1996). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder . Paper presented at the 104th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada, August 15, 1996. Retrieved February 22, 2009, from http://www.netaddiction.com/articles/newdisorder.htm
59.
Zywica, J., & Danowski, J. ( 2008). The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; Predicting FacebookTM and offline popularity from sociability and self-esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 14, 1-34.
