Although considerable academic interest has focused on serious cyber-crimes, more commonplace Internet misuses (e.g., misrepresentation of self, unauthorized downloading, Internet pornography, online plagiarism, and other “cyber-cheating”) have received less attention. Although these transgressions are of minor legal importance, they merit closer academic scrutiny. Based on a self-report study of 1,222 U.K. undergraduate students, this article explores the prevalence, nature, and underpinning facilitators of five examples of Internet-based misbehavior. Although more than 90% of respondents self-reported online misbehavior during the past 12 months, significant differences are evident in gender, Internet expertise, and, to a lesser extent, age. Although respondents portrayed the Internet as a more conducive environment for misbehavior, the survey data report a strong correlation between respondents' propensity to misbehave in online and offline contexts. These data highlight the need to contextualize cyber-deviance in relation to the offline “life world” of the Internet user and the Internet's wider role in everyday life.
Akers, R., Massey, J., Clarke, W., & Lauer, R. (1983). Are self-reports of adolescent deviance valid ? Social Forces, 62(1), 234-251.
2.
Al-Rafee, S., & Cronan, T. (2006). Digital piracy: Factors that influence attitude toward behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 237-259.
3.
Creswell, J. (2002). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. London, Sage.
4.
Daniel, A. (2002). An exploration of middle and high school students' perceptions of deviant behavior when using computers and the Internet. Journal of Technology Studies. Available from Digital Library and Archives, Virginia Tech University Web site, http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JOTS/v31/v31n2/pdf/daniel.pdf
5.
DeMarco, J. (2001). It's not just fun and war games. Available from U.S. Department of Justice Web site, http://www.cybercrime.gov/usamay2001_7.htm
6.
Denegri-Knott, J. (2004). Sinking the online music pirates. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 9, 4. Available from Journal of Computer Mediated Communication Web site, http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue4/denegri_knott.html
7.
Denegri-Knott, J. (2006). Consumers behaving badly. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 5(1), 82-94.
8.
Dowland, P., Furnell, S., Illingworth, H., & Reynolds, P. (1999). Computer crime and abuse. Computers and Security, 18, 715-726.
9.
Finch, E. (2003). What a tangled web we weave. In Y. Jewkes (Ed.), Dot.cons (pp. 86-104). Cullompton , UK: Willan. Available from Center for Problem-Oriented Policing Web site, http://www.popcenter.org/Problems/Supplemental_Material/identity_theft/Finch_2003.pdf
10.
Fleming, M., Greentree, S., Cocotti-Muller, D., Elias, K., & Morrison, S. (2006). Safety in cyberspace: Adolescents' safety and exposure online. Youth & Society, 38, 135-154.
11.
Freestone, O., & Mitchell, V. (2004). Generation Y attitudes towards e-ethics and Internet-related misbehaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 121-128.
12.
Fullerton, R., & Punj, G. (1997). What is consumer misbehavior?Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 336-339.
13.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
14.
Grabosky, P. (2001). Virtual criminality. Social & Legal Studies, 10(2), 243-249.
15.
Himanen, P. (2001). The hacker ethic and the spirit of the information age. London: Vintage.
16.
Hinduja, S. (2003). Trends and patterns among online software pirates . Ethics and Information Technology, 5, 49-61.
17.
Joinson, A. (Ed.). (2005). Deviance and the Internet: New challenges for social science [Special issue]. Social Science Computer Review, 23(1).
18.
Lara, P., Tacoronte, D., & Ding, J. (2006). Do current anti-cyberloafing disciplinary practices have a replica in research findings? Internet Research, 16, 450-467.
19.
MacInnes, I., Li, Y., & Yurcik, W. (2005). Reputation and dispute in E-bay transactions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(1), 27-54.
20.
Madden, M., & Rainie, L. (2005). Music and video downloading moves beyond P2P. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project .
21.
Mann, S., & Shek, W. (2007, January). Would I lie to you?Paper presented at the British Psychological Society's Division of Occupational Psychology Annual Conference, Bristol, UK.
22.
Mastrangelo, P., Everton, W., & Jolton, J. (2003). Deviant computer use at work. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2003. IEEE International Conference , pp. 2514-2520.
23.
McMurtry, K. (2001). E-cheating: Combating a 21st century challenge. T.H.E. Journal, 29(4), 36-41.
24.
Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford, UK: Berg.
25.
Palesh, O., Saltzman, K., & Koopman, C. (2004). Internet use and attitudes towards illicit Internet use behavior in a sample of Russian college students. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7, 553-558.
26.
Park, C. (2003). In other (people's) words: Plagiarism by university students-Literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 471-488.
27.
Patchin, J., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148-169.
28.
Quinn, J., & Forsyth, C. (2005). Describing sexual behavior in the era of the Internet . Deviant Behavior, 26(3), 191-207.
29.
Rahim, M., Seyal, A., & Rahman, M. (2001). Factors affecting softlifting intention of computing students: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, 385-405.
30.
Richard, P., Berk, R., & Forster, B. (1979). Crime as play. Cambridge, MA : Ballinger.
31.
Rocco, E., & Warglien, M. (1995). Computer mediated communication and the emergence of electronic opportunism. Available from Association for Consumer Research Web site, http://www.ceel.gelsco.unitn.it/papers/papero96
32.
Rogers, M., Smoak, N., & Liu, J. (2006). Self-reported deviant computer behavior. Deviant Behavior, 27(3), 245-268.
33.
Scanlon, P., & Neumann, D. (2002). Internet plagiarism among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(3), 374-385.
34.
Smith, M., & Marx, L. (1994). Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency . American Sociological Review, 22, 664-670.
37.
Thomas, J. (2005). The moral ambiguity of social control in cyberspace . New Media & Society, 7, 599-624.
38.
Underwood, J., & Szabo, A. (2004). Cybercheats: Is information and communication technology fuelling academic dishonesty? Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 180-199.
39.
Vardi, Y., & Weiner, Y. (1996). Misbehavior in organizations: A motivational framework . Organizational Science, 7, 151-165.
40.
Wall, D. (2005). The Internet as a conduit for criminals. In A. Pattavina (Ed.), Information technology and the criminal justice system (pp. 77-98). London: Sage.
41.
Wall, D. (2007). Cybercrime. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
42.
Ward, S., & Clark, J. (2002). Bidding behavior in on-line auctions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(4), 139-155.
43.
Waters, R. (2006, November 14). One in 100 Web pages pornographic . Financial Times.
44.
Williams, M. (2000). Virtually criminal. International Review of Law , Computers & Technology, 14(1), 95-104.
45.
Williams, M. (2005). Cybercrime. In J. Miller (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of criminology (pp. 256-257). London: Routledge.
46.
Wilson, D., Patterson, A., Powell, G., & Hembury, R. (2006, September). Fraud and technology crimes: Findings from the 2003/4 British Crime Survey and 2004 Offending, Crime and Justice Survey. London: Home Office.
47.
Yar, M. (2005). The novelty of cybercrime: An assessment in light of routine activity theory. European Journal of Criminology , 2, 407-427.
