For 18 years, Joseph Lieberman has represented the State of Connecticut in the U.S. Senate, gaining seniority and becoming popular enough in his state and party to be nominated for the Vice Presidency in 2000. However, due to his perceived closeness to President George W. Bush and his support for the war in Iraq, Lieberman faced an unexpected challenge in the Democratic Primary and ultimately lost the party's nomination to political upstart Ned Lamont. A multimillionaire who could finance his own campaign, Lamont was aided in his insurgency by a host of bloggers in Connecticut and across the nation who took it as their mission to defeat Lieberman. This article will examine the role bloggers played in Ned Lamont's primary campaign as sources of financial support, logistical assistance, and as a place for like-minded individuals to find a community to support his candidacy. In this way, blogs became a “virtual political party” for Lamont who was able to create a support system for his candidacy when the entire Democratic establishment was backing Lieberman. This campaign could provide a template for future candidates challenging party establishments and demonstrates that many of the traditional party functions can be replaced by the Internet.
ActBlue-Netroots Candidates. (2006). Retrieved Feb. 7, 2007, from http://www.actblue.com/page/netrootscandidates
2.
Aldrich, J. (1980). Before the convention. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press.
3.
Aldrich, J.H. (1995). Why parties? The origin and transformation of political parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Barry, E. (2006, August 9). Lieberman is defeated; Connecticut Senator, who supports the war in Iraq, vows to run as an independent against Ned Lamont, an antiwar political newcomer. Los Angeles Times, p. A1.
5.
BranfordBoy. (2006). MoveOn announces its own Connecticut primary May 25-26. Retrieved Feb. 7, 2007, from http://www.myleftnutmeg.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1234
6.
Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (171 U.S.App.D.C. 172).
7.
Budge, I., & Farlie, D.J. (1983). Explaining and predicting elections: Issue effects and party strategies in twenty-three democracies. London : George Allen & Unwin.
8.
Burke, E. (1897). Works, vol. 1. London: G. Bell and Sons.
9.
Cain, K. (2006, October). The kiss of death. GQ. Retrieved July 11, 2007, from http://men.style.com/gq/features/landing?id=content_5003
10.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy (1sted.). New York: HarperCollins.
11.
Epstein, L. (1967). Political parties in western democracies. New York: Praeger.
12.
FEC Candidate Summary Reports-Lieberman. (2007). Retrieved May 9, 2007, from http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/?_06+S8CT00022
13.
FEC Candidate Summary Reports-Lamont. (2006). Retrieved May 9, 2007, from http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/?_06+S6CT05066
14.
Feldmann, L. (2006, August 2). In Connecticut race, insurgent left aims at democratic Hawk. The Christian Science Monitor, p. 01.
15.
Kantrowitz, J. (2006). Kiss float itinerary. Retrieved February 7, 2007, from http://www.myleftnutmeg.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4009
16.
Key, V.O. (1946). Political parties and pressure groups. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.
17.
Kirkpatrick, D.D., & Hulse, C. (2005, March 7). On social security, Lieberman the centrist ruffles democratic feathers on the left. The New York Times , p. A13.
18.
Kos. (2005a). CT-Sen: Weicker ponders Lieberman challenge Retrieved May, 5, 2007, from http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/12/6/2133/53245
19.
Kos. (2005b). Lieberman's home-grown problems. Retrieved February 7, 2007, from http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/4/11/2445/98304
20.
Kos. (2005c). Lieberman attends national review bash. Retrieved February 7, 2007, from http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/10/9/21278/3010
21.
Kos. (2005d). Lieberman is all alone. Retrieved February 7, 2007, from http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/12/9/14530/5433
22.
Kos. (2005e). Lieberman vs. democrats. Retrieved February 7, 2007, from http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/3/17/15322/5717
23.
Kos. (2005f). Looking for a Lieberman challenger. Retrieved February 7, 2007, from http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/12/13/12539/627
24.
Kos. (2006a). CT-Sen: Is Lieberman beatable? Retrieved May 5, 2007, from http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/1/18/151214/197
25.
Kos. (2006b). CT-Sen: Lobbyists ponying up. Retrieved May 5, 2007, from http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/8/4/164320/1237
26.
Lubenow (Ed.). (2001). A user's guide to campaign finance reform. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. Menefee-Libey , D. (2000). The triumph of campaign-centered politics. New York: Chatham House.
27.
Michak, D. (2005, December 9). Liberals hunger for challenger for Lieberman; Wicker, actress, Kennedy all in speculation. Journal Inquirer. Retrieved July 11, 2007, from http://www.journalinquirer.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=15724732&BRD=985&PAG=461&dept_id=161556&rfi=6
28.
News, C. (2006). The Connecticut democratic primary. Retrieved May 5, 2007, from http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/CBSNews_polls/ctexitpoll.pdf
29.
Nichols, J. (2005). Run, Lowell, run. The Nation. Retrieved February 7, 2005, from http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?pid=42792
30.
Patterson, K.D., Bice, A.A., & Pipkin, E. (1999). Political parties, candidates, and presidential campaigns: 1952-1996. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 29(1), 26-39.
31.
Pazniokas, M. (2006a, March 13). Lamont Campaign builds step by step; candidate makes case as the anti-Lieberman. Hartford Courant , p. A1.
32.
Pazniokas, M. (2006b, May 25). Small donors aid Lamont. Hartford Courant, p. B11.
33.
Pazniokas, M., & Keating, C. (2006, May 20). Lamont forces primary; democratic state convention; as Lieberman wins 2-1, his challenger celebrates. Hartford Courant, p. A1.
34.
Plattner, M.F. (2001). The trouble with parties. The Public Interest (143), 27-45.
35.
Pomper, G.M. (1998). The Alleged Decline of American Parties. In J. G. Geer (Ed.), Politicians and party politics (Vol. 1, pp. 14-39). Baltimore : The Johns Hopkins University Press.
36.
Schattschneider, E.E. (1942). Party government. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
37.
Snyder Jr., J.M., & Ting, M.M. (2002). An informational rationale for political parties . American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 90.
38.
Sundquist, J.L. (1983). Dynamics of the party system: Alignment and realignment of political parties in the United States (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
39.
Trippi, J. (2004). The revolution will not be televised: Democracy, the Internet, and the overthrow of everything. New York : Regan Books.
40.
Wattenberg, M.P. (1994). The decline of American political parties 1952-1992 . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
41.
Yardley, W. (2006, May 19). Lieberman's support for war leaves him embattled on left. The New York Times, p. B1.
