Increasing sophistication of qualitative data analysis software facilitates its use on larger and more complex projects. Yet the way in which its use is operationalized in a team context is underexamined. This article explores the use of NUD*ist Version 6 (N6) in a large-scale evaluation. The way N6 was used in this evaluation was not merely determined by the functions it contains but by a series of pragmatic decisions resulting from the need to manage the complex logistics of a large, multisite team. Such dynamics affect the way in which data are understood and interrogated, thus inevitably influencing the nature of evidence created.
Bazeley, P. (2002a). The evolution of a project involving an integrated analysis of structured qualitative and quantitative data: From N3 to NVivo . International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5, 229-243.
2.
Bazeley, P. (2002b). Computerized data analysis for mixed methods research. In A. Tashakorri & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods for the social and behavioural sciences (pp. 385-422). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Bourdon, S. (2002). The integration of qualitative data analysis software in research strategies: Resistances and possibilities. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2). Retrieved February 3, 2003, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm
4.
Bryman, A., & Burgess, R. G. (Eds.). (1994). Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge.
5.
Cannon, J. (1998, November-December). Making sense of the interview material: Thematizing, NUD*ist, and 10 meg of transcripts. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Adelaide, Australia.
6.
Carvajal, D. (2002). The artisan's tools. Critical issues when teaching and learning CAQDAS. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2). Retrieved February 3, 2003, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm
7.
di Gregorio, S. (2001). Teamwork using QSR N5 software. QSR Newsletter, 16. Retrieved February 20, 2003, from http://www.qsrinternational.com/resources/newsletters.asp
8.
Fielding, N. (1993). Qualitative data analysis with a computer: recent developments. Social Research Update, 1. Retrieved February 3, 2003, from http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU1.html
9.
Fielding, N. (2000). The shared fate of two innovations in qualitative methodology: The relationship of qualitative software and secondary analysis or archived qualitative data. Forum: Qualitative Social Research , 1(3). Retrieved January 23, 2003, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm
10.
Gibbs, G.R., Friese, S., & Mangabeira, W.C. (2002). The use of new technology in qualitative research. Introduction to Issue 3(2) of FQS. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2). Retrieved February 10, 2003, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm
11.
Hesse-Biber, S. (1995). Unleashing Frankenstein's monster? The use of computers in qualitative research. In R. G. Burgess (Ed.), Studies in qualitative methodology: Computing and qualitative research: Volume 5 (pp. 25-41). London: JAI.
12.
Kelle, U. (1997). Theory building in qualitative research and computer programs for the management of textual data. Sociological Research Online, 2(2). Retrieved February 5, 2003, from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/1/.html
13.
MacMillan, K., & Koenig, T. (2004). The wow factor: Preconceptions and expectations for data analysis software in qualitative research. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 179-186.
14.
Mangabeira, W.C., Lee, R.M., & Fielding, N.G. (2004). Computers and qualitative research: adoption, use, and representation. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 167-178.
15.
Meyer, T., Gruppe, H., & Franz, M. (2002). Microsoft Access for the analysis of open-ended responses in questionnaires and interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2). Retrieved February 10, 2003, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm
16.
Morse, J.M., & Richards, L. (2002). Readme First for a user's guide to qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
17.
Nideröst, B. (2002). Computer-aided qualitative data analysis with Word. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2). Retrieved February 10, 2003, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm
18.
Richards, L. (2005). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. London: Sage.
19.
Richards, T. (2002). An intellectual history of NUD*ist and NVivo. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(3), 199-214.
20.
Richards, T., & Richards, L. (1994). Using computers in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 445-462). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Sin, C.H. (2003). The social organization of using N6 in a large scale, multi-site evaluation. The QSR Newsletter, 22, 6.
22.
Sin, C.H. (2004, September). Using NUD*ist (version 6) in evaluative research. Paper presented at the Fifth International Strategies in Qualitative Research Conference, Van Mildert College, University of Durham, Durham, UK.
23.
Sin, C.H. (2005, December). Learning the doing while doing the doing: the challenges of conducting research involving practitioner-researchers. Paper presented at the Social Research Association Annual Conference , London.
24.
Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Dillon, L., & National Centre for Social Research. (2003). Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. A quality framework. London: Cabinet Office.
25.
Tagg, C. (2002). Merging and its procedures in QSR software. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5, 277-287.
26.
Tesch, R. (1991). Software for qualitative research: analysis needs and program capabilities. In N. G. Fielding & R. M. Lee (Eds.), Using computers in qualitative research (pp. 16-37). London: Sage.
27.
Weitzman, E.A., & Miles, M.B. (1995). Computer programs for qualitative data analysis: a software source-book. London: Sage.
