Approaches to modeling social phenomena vary on a continuum from simple models, in which causality is clear and parameters few, to realistic, high-fidelity models designed to capture the most detailed system behavior possible in a specific setting. Anthropologists have produced both simple and high-fidelity models. The focus of this article is on high-fidelity modeling in anthropology and the special challenge its complexity presents for model comparison. Useful model comparison requires docking, or rendering models comparable, and the author presents a framework for docking based on the work of Axelrod, and Cioffi-Revilla and Gotts. Docking not only renders models more comparable, allowing for more traditional theory testing, but it also sharpens the discussion about the ontology of anthropological phenomena and how they are best represented as theories and models.
Agar, M. (2004). An anthropological problem, a complex solution. Human Organization, 63(4), 411-418.
2.
Agar, M. (2005). Agents in living color: Towards emic agent-based models. JASSS—Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 8(1), 1-19.Retrieved from http://jass.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/1/4.html
3.
Aoki, K., Wakano, J. Y., & Feldman, M. W. (2005). The emergence of social learning in a temporally changing environment: A theoretical model. Current Anthropology, 46(2), 334-340.
4.
Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of conflict and cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
Axtell, R. L., Epstein, J. M., Dean, J. S., Gumerman, G. J., Swelund, A. C., Harburger, J., et al. (2002). Population growth and collapse in a multiagent model of the Kayenta Anasazi in Long House Valley. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(Suppl. 3), 7275-7279.
6.
Bankes, S., Lempert, R., & Popper, S. (2002). Making computational social science effective. Social Science Computer Review, 20(4), 377-388.
7.
Barreteau, O., Bousquet, F., Millier, C., & Weber, J. (2004). Suitability of multi-agent simulations to study irrigated system viability: Application to case studies in the Senegal River Valley. Agricultural Systems, 80, 255-275.
8.
Berman, M., Nicolson, C., Kofinas, G., Tetlichi, J., & Martin, S. (2004). Adaptation and sustainability in a small arctic community: Results of an agent-based simulation model. Arctic, 57(4), 401-414.
9.
Berry, B. J. L., Kiel, L. D., & Elliott, E. (2002). Adaptive agents, intelligence, and emergent human organization: Capturing complexity through agent-based modeling. PNAS-Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(Suppl. 3), 7187-7188.
10.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1992). Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 171-195.
12.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2001). Norms and bounded rationality. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 281-296). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
Brantingham, P. J. (2003). A neutral model of stone raw material procurement. American Antiquity, 68(3), 487-509.
14.
Carley, K. (2002). Computational organization science: A new frontier. PNAS-Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(Suppl. 3), 7257-7262.
15.
Cioffi-Revilla, C., & Gotts, N. (2003). Comparative analysis of agent-based social simulations: GeoSim and FEARLUS models. JASSS-Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 6(4), 1-23. Retrieved from http://jass.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/4/10.html
16.
Collier, N. (2002). RePast: An extensible framework for agent simulation. Retrieved from http://repast.sourceforge.net/projects.html
17.
Coult, A. D. (1965). Computer methods for analyzing geneological space. American Anthropologist, 67, 21-29.
18.
Coult, A. D. (1968). A computer analysis of Bedouin marriage. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 24, 83-99.
19.
Dahl, G., & Hjort, A. (1976). Having herds. Stockholm: Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology 2, Department of Social Anthropology, University of Stockholm.
20.
Deadman, P., Robinson, D., Moran, E., & Brondizio, E. (2004). Colonist household decisionmaking and land-use change in the Amazon rainforest: An agent-based simulation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 693-709.
21.
Dean, J. S., Gumerman, G. J., Epstein, J. M., Axtell, R. L., Swedlund, A. C., Parker, M. T., et al. (2000). Understanding Anasazi culture change through agent-based modeling. In T. A. Kohler & G. J. Gumerman (Eds.), Dynamics in human and primate societies: Agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes (pp. 179-205). New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. L. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
Fischer, M. D. (1980). A generalized simulation of production and consumption in the valley of Oaxaca, Mexico. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Department of Anthropology.
24.
Fischer, M.D. (2004). Integrating anthropological approaches to the study of culture: The “hard” and the “soft.”Cybernetics and Systems, 35, 147-162.
25.
Flannery, K., Marcus, J., & Reynolds, R. (1989). The flocks of the Wamani. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
26.
Gladwin, H. (1975). Looking for an aggregate additive model in data from a hierarchical decision process. In S. Plattner (Ed.), Formal methods in economic anthropology (pp. 159-196). Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.
27.
Gumerman, G. J., Swedlund, A. C., Dean, J. S., & Epstein, J. M. (2003). The evolution of social behavior in the prehistoric American Southwest. Artificial Life, 9, 435-444.
28.
Hegman, M. (1989). Risk reduction and variation in agricultural economies: A computer simulation of Hopi agriculture. Economic Anthropology, 11, 89-121.
29.
Henrich, J. (2002). Cultural transmission and the diffusion of innovations: Adoption dynamics indicate that biased cultural transmission is the predominate force in behavioral change. American Anthropologist, 103(4), 992-1013.
30.
Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (1998). The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 215-241.
31.
Huigen, M. G. A. (2004). First principles of the MameLuke multi-actor modelling framework for land use change, illustrated with a Philippine case study. Journal of Environmental Management, 72, 5-21.
32.
Kohler, T. A. (2000). Putting social sciences together again. In T. A. Kohler & G. J. Gumerman (Eds.), Dynamics in human and primate societies: Agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes (pp. 1-18). New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Kohler, T. A., Kresl, J., Van West, C., Carr, E., & Wilshusen, R. H. (2000). Be there then: A modeling approach to settlement determinants and spatial efficiency among late ancestral Pueblo populations of the Mesa Verde Region, U.S. Southwest. In T. A. Kohler & G. J. Gumerman (Eds.), Dynamics in human and primate societies: Agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes (pp. 145-178). New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
Kunstadter, P., Buhler, R., Stephen, F., & Westoff, C. F. (1963). Demographic variability and preferential marriage patterns. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 21, 511-519.
35.
Kuznar, L. A. (1990). Economic models, ethnoarchaeology, and early pastoralism in the High Sierra of the South Central Andes. Unpublished Ph.D., Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
36.
Kuznar, L. A. (2001). Introduction to Andean ethnoarchaeology. In L. A. Kuznar (Ed.), Ethnoarchaeology in Andean South America: Contributions to archaeological method and theory (pp. 1-18). Ann Arbor, MI: International Monographs in Prehistory.
37.
Kuznar, L. A., Frederick, W. G., & Sedlmeyer, R. L. (2006). The effect of nepotism on the evolution of social inequality. In L. A. Kuznar & S. K. Sanderson (Eds.), Studying societies and cultures: Marvin Harris’s cultural materialism and its legacy. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
38.
Kuznar, L. A., & Sedlmeyer, R. L. (2005). Collective violence in Darfur: An agent-based model of pastoral nomad/sedentary peasant interaction. Mathematical Anthropology and Culture Theory.
39.
Kuznar, L. A., Sedlmeyer, R. L., & Frederick, W. G. (2005, May 18-22). Agent based models of risk sensitivity: Applications to social unrest, collective violence and terrorism. Paper Presented at the 3rd Lake Arrowhead Conference on Human Complex Systems, Lake Arrowhead, CA.
40.
Kuznar, L. A., Sedlmeyer, R. L., & Kreft, A. (in press). NOMAD: An agent-based model of nomadic pastoralist/sedentary peasant interaction. In Nomadic cultures. Los Angeles: University of California, COTSEN Institute.
41.
Lake, M. W. (2000). MAGICAL computer-simulation of Mesolithic foraging. In T. A. Kohler & G. J. Gumerman (Eds.), Dynamics in human and primate societies: Agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes (pp. 107-144). New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Lansing, J. S. (1993). Priests and programmers: Technologies of power in the engineered landscape of Bali. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
Lansing, J. S. (2000). Anti-chaos, common property, and the emergence of cooperation. In T. A. Kohler & G. J. Gumerman (Eds.), Dynamics in human and primate societies: Agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes (pp. 207-224). New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
Lansing, J. S., & Kremer, J. N. (1987). Emergent properties of Balinese water temple networks. American Anthropologist, 95(1), 97-114.
45.
Lansing, J. S., & Miller, J. H. (2005). Cooperation, games, and ecological feedback: Some insights from Bali. Current Anthropology, 46(2), 328-333.
46.
Lazar, A., & Reynolds, R. G. (2002, June 21). Computational framework for modeling the dynamic evolution of large-scale multi-agent organizations. Paper presented at the Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems Proceedings, Pittsburg.
47.
Leaf, M. J. (2004). Cultural systems and Organizational Processes. Cybernetics and Systems, 35, 289-313.
48.
Lustick, I. S. (2000). Agent-based modelling of collective identity: Testing constructivist theory. JASSS-Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 3(1), 1-29. Retrieved from http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/3/1/1.html
49.
Lustick, I. S., Miodownik, D., & Eidelson, R. J. (2004). Secessionism in multicultural states: Does sharing power prevent or encourage it?American Political Science Review, 98(2), 209-229.
50.
Mace, R. (1993). Nomadic pastoralists adopt subsistence strategies that maximise household survival. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 33, 329-334.
51.
Mace, R., & Houston, A. (1989). Pastoralist strategies for survival in unpredictable environments: A model of herd composition that maximises viability. Agricultural Systems, 31, 185-204.
52.
MacKerrow, E. P. (2003). Understanding why—Dissecting radical Islamist terrorism with agent-based simulation. Los Alamos Science, 28, 184-191.
53.
McElreath, R., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology, 44(1), 122-129.
54.
Netting, R. (1986). Cultural ecology (2nd. ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
55.
O’Meara, J. T. (1997). Causation and the struggle for a science of culture. Current Anthropology, 38, 399-418.
56.
O’Sullivan, D. (2004). Complexity science and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(3), 282-295.
57.
Plattner, S. (1975). Pedlar: A computer game in economic anthropology. In S. Plattner (Ed.), Formal methods in economic anthropology (pp. 197-215). Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.
58.
Raczynski, S. (2004). Simulation of the dynamic interactions between terror and anti-terror organizational structures. JASSS—Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 7(2). Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/2/8.html
59.
Read, D. W. (2002). A multitrajectory, competition model of emergent complexity in human social organization. PNAS—Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(Supplement 3), 7251-7256.
60.
Read, D. W., & LeBlanc, S. A. (2003). Population growth, carrying capacity, and conflict. Current Anthropology, 44(1), 59-85.
61.
Reynolds, R. G. (2000). The impact of raiding on settlement patterns in the northern valley of Oaxaca: An approach using decision trees. In T. A. Kohler & G. J. Gumerman (Eds.), Dynamics in human and primate societies: Agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes (pp. 251-274). New York: Oxford University Press.
62.
Sallach, D. L. (2003). Social theory and agent architectures: Prospective issues in rapid-discovery social science. Social Science Computer Review, 21(2), 179-195.
63.
Sallach, D. L., & Macal, C. M. (2001). Introduction: The simulation of social agents. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), 245-248.
64.
Satterfield, T. (2001). Toward a sociogenetic solution: Examining language formation processes through SWARM modeling. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), 281-295.
65.
Stahl, A. B. (1993). Concepts of time and approaches to analogical reasoning in historical perspective. American Antiquity, 58(2), 235-260.
66.
Terna, P. (1998). Simulation tools for social scientists: Building agent based models with SWARM. JASSS—Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1/2/4.html
67.
White, D. R. (1999). Controlled simulation of marriage systems. JASSS—Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2(3). Retrieved from http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS2/3/5.html
68.
White, D. R. (2004). Network analysis and social dynamics. Cybernetics and Systems, 35, 173-192.
69.
White, D. R., & Johansen, U. C. (2004). Network analysis and ethnographic problems: Process models of a Turkish nomad clan. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
70.
Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
71.
Winterhalder, B. (1986a). Diet choice, risk, and food sharing in a stochastic environment. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 5, 369-392.
72.
Winterhalder, B. (1986b). Optimal foraging: Simulation studies of diet choice in a stochastic environment. Journal of Ethnobiology, 6, 205-223.
73.
Wylie, A. (1988). “Simple” analogy and the role of relevance assumptions: Implications of archaeological practice. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2, 134-150.
