This article analyzes the impact of the number of parties on turnout rates within an endogenous partisan preference framework. Our results show that the turnout increases in the number of parties under various levels of individual propensity to abstain. We find strong interactions effects between both motives for abstention—alienation and indifference—and the abstention propensity. The results are based on an agent-based computer simulation of multiparty electoral competition in a two-dimensional policy space.
Adams, J. (1999). Multiparty spatial competition with probabilistic voting. Public Choice, 99, 259-274.
2.
Adams, J. (2000). Multicandidate equilibrium in American elections. Public Choice, 103, 297-325.
3.
Adams, J., & Merrill, S. (2003). Voter turnout and candidate strategies in American elections. Journal of Politics, 65, 161-189.
4.
Adams, J., & Merrill, S. (2004, April 15-18). Candidate equilibrium and the behavioral model of voter choice and turnout: Theoretical results and an empirical test. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.
5.
Adams, J., Merrill, S., & Grofman, B. (2005). A unified theory of party competition: A cross-national analysis integrating spatial and behavioral factors. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Brody, R. A. (1978). The puzzle of political participation in America. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 287-324). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
7.
Brody, R. A., & Page, B. I. (1973). Indifference, alienation, and rational decisions. Public Choice, 15, 1-17.
8.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
9.
Enelow, J., & Hinich, M. (1984). Probabilistic voting and the importance of centrist ideologies in democratic elections. Journal of Politics, 46, 459-478.
10.
Freeman, R. B. (2003). What, me vote? (NBER Working Paper 9896). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
11.
Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (2002). Game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1991)
12.
Highton, B., & Wolfinger, R. (1998). Estimating the effects of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993. Political Behavior, 20, 79-104.
13.
Hinich, M., & Ordeshook, P. (1970). Plurality maximization vs. vote maximization: A spatial analysis with variable participation. American Political Science Review, 64, 772-791.
14.
Morton, R. (2005). Analyzing elections. New York: Norton.
15.
Morton, R. B. (1999). Methods and models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Plümper, T., & Martin, C. W. (2004). Stochastic equilibria in spatial multi-party competition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the European Public Choice Society, Berlin, Germany.
17.
Riker, W. H. (1980). Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions. American Political Science Review, 74, 432-446.
18.
Stadler, B. (2000). Abstention in dynamical models of spatial voting. Physica A, 287, 660-668.
