This article reports the author’s experience teaching sociology graduate students howto analyze qualitative data. The course focused on teaching practical skills of defining coding categories, coding text, analyzing coded text, and writing up the results of analysis. The assignments used Qualrus software to give students hands-on practice doing all of these. The course was enthusiastically received and will become a permanent part of the sociology methods course offerings at American University.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Charmaz, K. (1991). Translating graduate qualitative methods into undergraduate teaching: Intensive interviewing as a case example. Teaching Sociology, 19, 384-395.
2.
Clark, R., & Lang, A. (2002). Balancing yin and yang: Teaching qualitative data analysis within an undergraduate qualitative data analysis course. Teaching Sociology, 30, 348-360.
3.
Emerson, R. M. (2001). Contemporary field research: Perspectives and formulations (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
4.
Este, D., Sieppert, J., & Barsky, A. (1998). Teaching and learning qualitative research with and without qualitative data analysis software. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 138-154.
5.
Fielding, N. G., & Lee, R. M. (1998). Computer analysis and qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Halfpenny, P. (1981). Teaching ethnographic data analysis in postgraduate courses in sociology. Journal of the British Sociological Association, 15, 564-570.
7.
Hesse-Biber, S. (1995). Unleashing Frankenstein’s monster? The use of computers in qualitative research. Studies in Qualitative Methodology, 5, 25-42.
8.
Keen, M. F. (1996). Teaching qualitative methods: A face-to-face encounter. Teaching Sociology, 24, 166-176.
9.
Kelle, U. (Ed.). (1995). Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Theory, methods, and practice. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
10.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Lee, R. M., & Fielding, N. G. (1991). Computing for qualitative research: Options, problems, potential. In N. G.Fielding & R. M. Lee (Eds.), Using computers in qualitative research (pp. 1-13). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1994). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
13.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Nyden, P. (1991). Teaching qualitative methods: Aninterviewwith Phil Nyden. Teaching Sociology, 19, 396-402.
15.
Richards, T., & Richards, L. (1995). Using hierarchical categories in qualitative data analysis. In U. Kelle (Ed.), Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Theory, methods, and practice (pp. 80-95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Rushing, B., & Winfield, I. (1999). Learning about sampling and measurement by doing content analysis of personal advertisements. Teaching Sociology, 27, 159-166.
17.
Schmid, T. J. (1992). Classroom-based ethnography: A research pedagogy. Teaching Sociology, 20, 28-35.
18.
Seidel, J. (1991). Method and madness in the application of computer technology to qualitative data analysis. In N. G. Fielding& R. M. Lee (Eds.), Using computers in qualitative research (pp. 107-116). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Snyder, E. E. (1995). Teaching qualitative research: The meanings associated with farm buildings. Teaching Sociology, 23, 39-43.
20.
Stalp, M. C., & Grant, L. (2001). Teaching qualitative coding in undergraduate field method classes: An exercise based on personal ads. Teaching Sociology, 29, 209-218.
21.
Tesch, R. (1988, August 24-28). The correspondence between different kinds of qualitative analysis and different kinds of software. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Atlanta, GA.
22.
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer.
