The web offers an unprecedented opportunity to gain immediate access to government resources that might not otherwise be available to many older adults aged 60 years and over. Yet due to aging vision, there remain design barriers to the use of state and federal government web sites. This research describes aging vision and its impact on the accessibility of government web sites. It incorporates the guidelines published by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) for making senior-friendly web sites. Several software tools, including Dottie and Usability Enforcer, are described in terms of their functionality in promoting senior-friendly web sites. Data generated by the software tools and manual assessment are used to evaluate e-government compliance with vision-related NIA accessibility guidelines.
Becker, S. A.,& Nowak, L. (2003). User profiling in an automated environment to promote universal web usability. Paper presented at the 2003 Proceedings of the Information Resource Management Association, Philadelphia, PA.
5.
Bennett, E., & Eklund, S. (1983). Vision changes, intelligence, and aging: Part I & II. Educational Gerontology, 9, 255-278, 435-442.
Charness, N., & Bosman, E. A. (1992). Human factors and aging. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition(pp. 495-545). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Echt, K. V. (2002). Designing web-based health information for older adults: Visual considerations and design directives. In R. W. Morrell (Ed.), Older adults, health information, and the World Wide Web(pp. 61-88). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Elliott, D. B. (1987).Contrast sensitivity decline with aging: A neural or optical phenomenon? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 7, 415-419.
10.
Ellis, R. D.,& Kurnaiwan, S. H. (2000).Increasing the usability of online information for older users: A case study in participatory design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 263-276.
11.
Hartley, J. (1999). What does it say? Text design, medical information, and older readers. In D. C. Park, R. W. Morrell, & K. Shirfren (Eds.), Processing of medical information in aging patients(pp. 233-248). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
12.
Hawthorne, D. (2000).Possible implications of aging for interface designers. Interacting with Computers, 12, 507-528.
13.
Hiatt, L. G. (1987). Designing for the vision and hearing impairments for the elderly. In V. Regnier & J. Pynoos (Eds.), Housing the aged: Design directives and policy considerations(pp. 341-371). New York: Elsevier.
14.
Holt, J. B. (2000).Creating senior-friendly web sites. Center for Medicare Education Issue Brief, 1, 1-8.
15.
Kline, D. W.,& Scialfa, C. T. (1997). Sensory and perceptual functioning: Basic research and human factors implications. In A. D. Fisk & W. A. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of human factors and the older adult(pp. 27-54). Toronto, Canada: Academic Press.
16.
Morrell, R. W., Dailey, S. R., Feldman, C., Mayhorn, C. B.,& Echt, K. V. (2002). Older adults and information technology: A compendium of scientific research and web site accessibility guidelines. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Aging.
17.
NIA. (2001). Making your web site senior friendly: A checklist. National Institute on Aging and National Library of Medicine. Retrieved July 30, 2003, from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/checklist.pdf
18.
Nielsen, J., & Tahir, M. (2002). Homepage usability: 50 web sites deconstructed. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.
