This article addresses the evolution and implementation of e-government with a neoinstitutional perspective. It starts with a critique on Jane Fountain's technology enactment framework in that the framework fails to show how elected officials, public administrators, and citizens can facilitate e-government toward better democratic governance. This problem reflects the immaturity and ambiguity of neo-institutionalism in accounting for institutional change. The author argues that a balance between agent and institution, between strategic choice and institutional constraint should be maintained in analyzing the evolution of e-government as a long-term institutional change. This balanced approach would give public administration a more optimistic future of e-government.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott, A. (1992). An old institutionalist reads the new institutionalism . Contemporary Sociology, 21, 754-756 .
2.
Ayres, C. E. (1944). The theory of economic progress. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press .
3.
Barber, B. R. (2001). The uncertainty of digital politics: Democracy's uneasy relationship with information technology . Harvard International Review, 23, 42-47 .
4.
Barley, S. R. (1998). What can we learn from the history of technology? Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, 237-255 .
5.
Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution . Organizational Studies, 18, 93-117 .
6.
Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT .
7.
Brower, R. S., & Abolafia, M. Y. (1996). Procedural entrepreneurship: Enacting alternative channels to administrative effectiveness . American Review of Public Administration, 26, 287-308 .
8.
Carr, J. B., & Brower, R. S. (2000). Principled opportunism: Evidence from the organizational middle . Public Administration Quarterly, 24, 109-138 .
9.
Clemens, E. S., & Cook, J. M. (1999). Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change . Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 441-466 .
10.
Coe, A., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-governance and smart communities: A social learning challenge . Social Science Computer Review, 19, 80-93 .
11.
Davern, M. J., & Kauffman, R. J. (2000). Discovering potential and realizing value from information technology investments . Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 121-143 .
12.
Diermeier, D., & Krehbiel, K. (2003). Institutionalism as a methodology . Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15, 123-144 .
13.
DiMaggio, P. (1998). The new institutionalisms: Avenues of collaboration . Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 154, 697-705 .
14.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
15.
Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
16.
General Accounting Office. (2001, July 11). Electronic government: Challenges must be addressed with effective leadership and management (GAO-01-959T). Washington, DC: Author .
17.
Gorges, M. J. (2001). New institutionalist explanations for institutional change: A note of caution . Politics, 21, 137-145 .
18.
Hall, P., & Taylor, R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms . Political Studies, 44, 936-957 .
19.
Hasselbladh, H., & Kallinikos, J. (2000). The project of rationalization: A critique and reappraisal of neo-institutionalism in organization studies . Organization Studies, 2, 697-720 .
20.
Held, D. (1996). Models of democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
21.
Henman, P., & Adler, M. (2001). Information technology and transformations in social security policy and administration: A review . International Social Security Review, 54(4), 23-47 .
22.
Hira, A., & Hira, R. (2000). The new institutionalism: Contradictory notions of change . American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 59, 267-282 .
23.
Hoetker, G. (2002). [Review of the book Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change] . Academy of Management Review, 27, 619-622 .
24.
Kim, S., & Donghwan, K. (2003). South Korean public officials' perceptions of values, failure, and consequences of failure in e-government leadership . Public Performance and Management Review, 26, 360-375 .
25.
Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (1996). Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change . American Sociological Review, 61, 812-836 .
26.
Lacharite, J. (2002). Electronic decentralization in China: A critical analysis of Internet filtering policies in the People's Republic of China . Australian Journal of Political Science, 37, 333-346 .
27.
La Porte, T. M., Demchak, C. C., & De Jong, M. (2002). Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the web: Empirical findings and theoretical speculations . Administration & Society, 34, 411-446 .
28.
Lawson, T. (2003). Institutionalism: On the need to firm up notions of social structure and the human subject . Journal of Economic Issues, 37, 175-207 .
29.
MacKenzie, D. (1990). Inventing accuracy: A historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance. Cambridge, MA: MIT .
30.
Mahler, J., & Regan, P. M. (2002). Learning to govern online: Federal agency Internet use . American Review of Public Administration, 32, 326-349 .
31.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press .
32.
Nielsen, K. (2001). Institutionalist approaches in the social sciences: Typology, dialogue, and future challenges . Journal of Economic Issues, 35, 505-516 .
33.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press .
34.
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other . Social Studies of Science, 14, 399-441 .
35.
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
36.
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness . Public Productivity Review, 5, 122-140 .
37.
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis . Management Science, 29, 363-377 .
38.
Reich, S. (2000). The four faces of institutionalism: Public policy and a pluralistic perspective . Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13, 501-522 .
39.
Scavo, C., & Shi, Y. (2000). The role of information technology in the reinventing government paradigm—Normative predicates and practical challenges . Social Science Computer Review, 18, 166-178 .
40.
Scharpf, F. W. (Eds.). (1993). Games in hierarchies and networks: Analytical and empirical approaches to the study of governance institutions. Boulder, CO: Westview .
41.
Smircich, L., & Stubbart, C. (1985). Strategic management in an enacted world . Academy of Management Review, 10, 724-736 .
42.
Sorge, A. (1989). An essay on technical change: Its dimensions and social and strategic context . Organizational Studies, 10, 23-44 .
43.
Werle, R. (1998). An institutional approach to technology . Science Studies, 11, 3-18 .
44.
West, D. M. (2002). Global e-government, 2002 (Policy report for the Center for Public policy, Brown University ). Retrieved June 3, 2003, from http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt02int.PDF
45.
Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. In W. H. Dutton with M. Peltu (Ed.), Information and communication technologies: Visions and realities (pp. 53-67). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press .
46.
Winner, L. (1993). Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology . Science, Technology & Human Values, 18, 362-378 .
47.
Yang, K. (2002). From “Danwei” society to new community building: Opportunities and challenges for citizen participation in Chinese cities . Chinese Public Administration Review, 1, 65-82 .
48.
Zhang, J. (2002). Will the government “serve the people?” New Media & Society, 4, 163-184 .
49.
Zucker, L. G. (1991). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 83-107). Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
