In this article, the authors examine the possibilities of information communication technology and e-government to enhance democracy. The authors summarize the known problems of representative democracy and direct democracy and inquire whether e-government potentially can offer solutions to these problems. The authors conclude that a lot of problems in both representative and direct democracies remain unsolved and that e-government even can create new problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Hagen, M. (1997). Computernetzwerke und politische Theorie in den USA (Computer networks and political theory in the USA). Hamburg, Germany: LIT-Verlag .
2.
Holznagel, B., & Hanssmann, A. (2001). Möglichkeiten von wahlen und Bürgerbeteiligung per Internet (Possibilities of voting and participation of the citizens through the Internet). In B. Holznagel, A. Grünwald, & A. Hanssmann (Eds.), Elektronische Demokratie (pp. 55-72). München, Germany: C. H. Beck .
3.
Janssen, D. (in press). Ierland (Ireland). In J. K. Kampen, D. Janssen, S. Rotthier, & K. Snijkers (Eds.), De praktijk van e-Government in zeven landen van de OECD. Brugge, Belgium: Die Keure .
4.
Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N. K., & Kouzmin, A. (2003). Reinventing the democratic governance project through information technology? A growing agenda for debate . Public Administration Review, 1, 44-60 .
5.
Kampen, J. K., & Molenberghs, G. (2002). Vertrouwen in De Regering En Tevredenheid Met Het Gevoerde Beleid (Trust in government and satisfaction with pursued policies). In M. Swyngedouw & J. Billiet (Eds.), De Kiezer Heeft Zijn Redenen: 13 Juni 1999 En De Politieke Opvattingen Van Vlamingen (pp. 179-191). Leuven, Belgium: Acco .
6.
Kampen, J. K., & Van de Walle, S. (2003). Het vertrouwen van de Vlaming opgesplitst in dimensies en indicatoren (Trust of the Fleming split up into dimensions and indicators). In Vlaanderen Gepeild (pp. 175-197). Brussels, Belgium: Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap .
7.
Kleinsteuber, H. J. (2001). Das Internet in der Demokratie (The Internet in a democracy). In B. Holznagel, A. Grünwald, & A. Hanssmann (Eds.), Elektronische Demokratie (pp. 7-27). München, Germany: C. H. Beck .
8.
Komito, L. (1999). Political transformations: Clientelism and technological change . In J. Armintage & J. Roberts (Eds.), Exploring Cyber Society conference proceedings Volume II. Retrieved July 2003, from http://www.ucd.ie/lis/staff/komito/
9.
Lenihan, D. G., & Kaufman, J. (2001). Leveraging our diversity: Canada as a learning society. Ottawa, Canada: Centre for Collaborative Government .
10.
Levine, P. (2002). Can the Internet save democracy? Toward an on-line commons. In R. Hayduk & K. Mattson (Eds.), Democracy's moment: Reforming the American political systems (pp. 121-137). New York: Rowman & Littlefield .
11.
Matilla, J. (2003). Participatory e-governance—A new solution to an old problem? In A. Salminan (Ed.), Governing networks (pp. 161-170). Amsterdam: IOS Press .
12.
McIntosh, A. (2001). E-democracy: The European experience . Public Policy Forum, 3, 1-2 .
13.
McLean, I. (1989). Democracy and new technology. Cambridge, UK: Polity .
14.
Meijer, A. (2002). De doorzichtige overheid: Parlementaire en juridische controle in het informatietijdperk (The transparent government: Parliamentary and juridical control in the information age). Delft, the Netherlands: Eburon .
15.
Ministère de la fonction publique et de la réforme de l'Etat. (2002). Nouvelles technologies et organisation travail et des services dans l'administration (New technologies and the organization of work and services in the administration). Information retrieved July 2003, from http://www.fonction-publique.gouv.fr/reforme/admelec/dossiers/travail.htm
16.
Nye, J. S., Zelikow, P. D., & King, D. C. (1997). Why people don't trust government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
17.
Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2000). Information technology, public policy and Canadian governance: Partnerships and predicaments. Ottawa, Canada: Centre on Governance, University of Ottawa .
18.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform. A comparative analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press .
19.
Snellen, I. T. M. (1995). Informatie-communicatietechnologie en democratie (Information and communication technology and democracy) . Wijsgerig Perspectief op Maatschappij en Wetenschap, 1, 6-13 .
20.
Thomas, J. C. (2003, March). E-democracy, e-commerce, and e-research: Examining the electronic ties between citizens and governments . Paper prepared for ASPA's 64th National conference: The Power of Public Service, Washington, DC.
21.
Van Duivenboden, H. P. M. (1999). Koppeling in uitvoering: Een verkennende studie naar de betekenis van het koppelen van persoonsgegevens door uitvoerende overheidsorganisaties voor de positie van de burger als cliënt van de overheid (Linking in practice: An explorative study to the effect of the linking of personal data by executive governmental organizations for the position of the citizen as a client of government). Delft, the Netherlands: Eburon .
22.
Van Gunsteren, H. (2002). Voor democratie maar tegen politiek (Pro-democracy but anti-politics). In J. Van Holsteyn & C. Mudde (Eds.), Democratie in verval? (pp. 17-32). Amsterdam: Boom .
23.
Weimer, D. L., & Vining, A. R. (1989). Policy analysis: Concepts and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
