Web Surveys as Part of a Mixed-Mode Strategy for Populations that cannot be Contacted by E-Mail

Abstract

Potential respondents to web surveys are usually contacted by e-mail. For general target populations, e-mail addresses are usually not available. This study explores whether a sequential mixed-mode web/mail strategy can be used for such a population to encourage respondents to choose the web mode. In the authors' sequential mixed-mode web/mail survey, respondents were first encouraged to reply by web and in a follow-up were also offered mail questionnaires. Even though the target population (high school students) is presumed to be relatively computer savvy, the authors find that almost two thirds of the respondents nonetheless prefer responding by mail. In the first stage (when respondents can only reply on the web), phone reminders increase the number of web responses. In the second stage (when respondents may choose between responding by mail or by web), mail incentives increase the number of mail responses but do not affect the number of web responses.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2000). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: Author.

Comley, P. (1996). Internet surveys: The use of the Internet as a data collection method. ESOMAR/EMAC: Research Methodologies for “The New Marketing” Symposium, ESOMAR Publication Services, 204, 335-346.

Couper, M. P., Blair, J., & Triplett, T. (1999). A comparison of mail and e-mail for a survey of employees in U.S. statistical agencies. Journal of Official Statistics, 15, 39-56.

Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys. The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley.

Flemming, G., & Sonner, M. (1999, May). Can Internet polling work? Strategies for conducting public opinion surveys online. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal, Canada.

Fricker, R., & Schonlau, M. (2002). Advantages and disadvantages of Internet research surveys: Evidence from the literature. Field Methods, 14(4), 347-367.

Jones, R., & Pitt, N. (1999). Health surveys in the workplace: Comparison of postal, email and World Wide Web methods. Occupational Medicine, 49, 556-558.

Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. New York: John Wiley.

Paolo, A. M., Bonaminio, G. A., Gibson, C., Partridge, T., & Kallail, K. (2000). Response rate comparisons of e-mail and mail distributed student evaluations. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 12, 81-84.

10.

Parker, L. (1992, July). Collecting data the e-mail way. Training and Development, pp. 52-54.

11.

Quigley, B., Riemer, R. A., Cruzen, D. E., & Rosen, S. (2000, November). Internet versus paper survey administration: Preliminary finding on response rates. Paper presented at the 42nd annual conference of the International Military Testing Association, Edinburgh, Scotland.

12.

Schaefer, D. R., & Dillman, D. A. (1998). Development of a standard e-mail methodology: Results of an experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 378-397.

13.

Schillewaert, N., Langerak, F., & Duhamel, T. (1998). Non-probability sampling for www surveys: A comparison of methods. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40, 307-322.

14.

Schonlau, M., Fricker, R., & Elliott, M. (2002). Conducting research surveys via e-mail and the web. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

15.

Tse, A. C. B., Tse, K. C., Yin, C. H., Ting, C. B., Yi, K. W., Yee, K. P., et al. (1995). Comparing two methods of sending out questionnaires: E-mail versus mail. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, 441-446.

16.

Witte, J. C., Amoroso, L. M., & Howard, P. E. N. (2000). Research methodology—Method and representation in Internet-based survey tools. Social Science Computer Review, 18, 179-195.

17.

Zhang, Y. (1999). Using the Internet for survey research: A case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 57-68.