This article interleaves two themes: (a) the prospective role of agent simulation in developing a high-consensus, rapid-discovery social science and (b) the use of situation modeling to illustrate how the interaction of social theory and agent architectures may contribute toward such a development. The first theme suggests that computational techniques have the potential to contribute to the advancement of broadly shared social science goals. The second theme uses a relatively specialized epistemological focus, the social situation as a focus of attention and action, to illustrate how agent architectures based on that focus may contribute to scientific progress and, in particular, how they may need to evolve. Situationist epistemology is invoked to convey the important role of ontological assumptions and architectural frameworks in social scientific modeling but also to advance situational models within multilevel social theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott, A. (1988). Transcending general linear reality. Sociological Theory, 6(2), 169-186.
2.
Abbott, A. (1995). Things of boundaries. Social Research, 62(4), 857-881.
3.
Abbott, A. (1997). Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago School. Social Forces, 75(4), 1149-1182.
4.
Abbott, A. (2001). Time matters: On theory and method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Alexander, C. (1979). A timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Anderson, B. (1989). On artificial intelligence and theory construction in sociology. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 14(2-3), 209-216.
7.
Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
Bainbridge, W. S. (1995). Neural network models of religious belief. Sociological Perspectives, 38(4), 483-495.
9.
Bainbridge, W. S., Brent, E. E., Carley, K. M., Heise, D. R., Macy, M. W., Markovsky, B., et al. (1994). Artificial social intelligence. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 407-436.
10.
Barwise, J. (1989). The situation in logic. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information.
11.
Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1999). Situations and attitudes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information.
13.
Barwise, J., & Seligman, J. (1997). Information flow: The logic of distributed systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Botsford, L. W. (1992). Individual state structure in population models. In D. L. DeAngelis & L. J. Gross (Eds.), Individual-based models and approaches in ecology (pp. 213-236). New York: Chapman & Hall.
15.
Brachman, R. J., & Levesque, H. J. (Eds.). (1985). Readings in knowledge representation. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
16.
Bratman, M. E. (1999). Intention, plans, and practical reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information.
17.
Brooks, R. A. (1999). Cambrian intelligence: The early history of the new AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
Bryson, J. J., & Stein, L. A. (2001a). Architectures and idioms: Making progress in agent design. In C. Castelfranchi & Y. Lespérance (Eds.), Seventh International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (pp. 73-88). New York: Springer.
19.
Bryson, J. J., & Stein, L. A. (2001b). Modularity and design in reactive intelligence. In Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1115-1120). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
20.
Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Adolphs, R., Carter, C. S., Davidson, R.J., McClintock, M. K., et al. (Eds.). (2002). Foundations in social neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Cederman, L.-E. (1997). Emergent actors in world politics: How states and nations develop and dissolve. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
Cederman, L.-E. (2001, October). Endogenizing geopolitical boundaries with agent-based modeling. Paper presented at the National Academy of Sciences Colloquium on Adaptive Agents, Intelligence and Emergent Human Organization: Capturing Complexity Through Agent-Based Simulation, Irvine, CA.
23.
Cicourel, A. V. (1964). Method and measurement in sociology. New York: Free Press.
24.
Cioffi-Revilla, C. (1997). The road to war: Modelling international conflict with principles of political uncertainty theory. Paper presented to the Conference on Advances in Mathematical Modelling of International Conflict, Oxford, UK.
25.
Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2002). Invariance and universality in social agent-based simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99(Suppl. 3, 14), 7314-7316.
26.
Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Clark, J. S. (1992). Relationships among individual plant growth and the dynamics of populations and ecosystems. In D. L. DeAngelis & L. J. Gross (Eds.), Individual-based models and approaches in ecology (pp. 421-455). New York: Chapman & Hall.
28.
Clocksin, W. F., & Mellish, C. S. (1981). Programming in Prolog. New York: Springer-Verlag.
29.
Collins, R. (1976). Conflict sociology: Toward an explanatory science. New York: Academic Press.
30.
Collins, R. (1981a). Micro-translation as a theory building strategy. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies (pp. 81-108). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
31.
Collins, R. (1981b). On the microfoundations of macrosociology. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 984-1014.
32.
Collins, R. (1981c). Sociology since midcentury: Essays in theory cumulation. New York: Academic Press.
33.
Collins, R. (1987). Interaction ritual chains, power and property: The micro-macro connection as an empirically based theoretical problem. In J. C. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch, & N. J. Smelser (Eds.), The micro-macro link (pp. 193-206). Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
Collins, R. (1988a). The micro contribution to macro sociology. Sociological Theory, 6(2), 242-253.
35.
Collins, R. (1988b). Theoretical sociology. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
36.
Collins, R. (1989). Sociology: Proscience or antiscience? American Sociological Review, 54(1), 124-139.
37.
Collins, R. (1993). Emotional energy as the common denominator of rational choice. Rationality and Society, 5(2), 203-230.
38.
Collins, R. (1994). Why the social sciences won't become high-consensus, rapid-discovery science. Sociological Forum, 9(2), 155-177.
39.
Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Collins, R. (2000). Situational stratification: A micro-macro theory of inequality. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 17-43.
41.
Dean, J. S., Gumerman, G. J., Epstein, J. M., Axtell, R. L., Swedlund, A. C., Parker, M. T., et al. (2000). Understanding Anasazi culture change through agent-based modeling. In T. A. Kohler & G. J. Gumerman (Eds.), Dynamics in human and primate societies: Agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes (pp. 179-207). New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Devlin, K. (1991). Logic and information. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Devlin, K. (1994). Situation theory and social structure. In M. Masuch & L. Polos (Eds.), Knowledge representation and reasoning under uncertainty (pp. 197-237). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
44.
Devlin, K., & Rosenberg, D. (1993). Situation theory and cooperative action. In P. Aczel, D. Israel, Y. Katagiri, & S. Peters (Eds.), Situation theory and its applications (Vol. 3, pp. 213-264). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information.
45.
Durkheim, E. (1938). The rules of the sociological method. New York: Free Press.
46.
Ferber, J. (1999). Multi-agent systems: An introduction to distributed artificial intelligence. Harlow, UK: Addison-Wesley.
47.
Fessler, M. T. (2001). Emotions and cost-benefit assessment: The role of shame and self-esteem in risk taking. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 191-214). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
Feynman, R. (1967). The character of physical law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49.
Fitoussi, D., & Tennenholtz, M. (2000). Choosing social laws for multi-agent systems: Minimality and simplicity. Artificial Intelligence, 119, 61-101.
50.
Foster, I., & Kesselman, C. (Eds.). (1999). The grid: Blueprint for a new computing infrastructure. San Francisco: Morgan Kauffman.
51.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
52.
Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology's program. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
53.
Genesereth, M. R., & Nilsson, N. J. (1987). Logical foundations of artificial intelligence. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
54.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
Gilbert, G. N., & Heath, C. (Eds.). (1985). Social action and artificial intelligence. Brookfield, VT: Gower.
58.
Gilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. G. (1999). Simulation for the social scientist. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
59.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Doubleday.
60.
Gonos, G. (1977). “Situation” versus “frame”: The “interactionist” and the “structuralist” analyses of everyday life. American Sociological Review, 42(6), 854-867.
61.
Goodspeed, D. J. (1977). The German wars: 1941-1945. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
62.
Gruninger, M., & Lee, J. (2002). Ontology applications and design. Communications of the ACM, 45(2), 39-41.
63.
Hendriks-Jansen, H. (1996). Catching ourselves in the act: Situated activity, interactive emergence, evolution, and human thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
Hilbert, R. A. (1990). Ethnomethodology and the micro-macro order. American Sociological Review, 55(6), 794-808.
65.
Hilbert, R. A. (1992). The classical roots of ethnomethodology: Durkheim, Weber and Garfinkel. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
66.
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
67.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: Garden to earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
68.
Israel, D., & Perry, J. (1991). Information and architecture. In J. Barwise, J. M. Gawron, G. Plotkin, & S. Tutiya (Eds.), Situation theory and its applications (Vol. 2, pp. 147-160). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information.
69.
Jackson, P., Reichgelt, H., & van Hamelen, F. (1989). Logic-based knowledge representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70.
Jennings, N. R. (2000). On agent-based software engineering. Artificial Intelligence, 117, 277-296.
71.
Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72.
Kemper, T. D. (Ed.). (1990). Research agendas in the sociology of emotions. Albany: State University of New York Press.
73.
Kohler, T. A., Kresl, J., Van West, C., Carr, E., & Wilshusen, R. H. (2000). Be there then: A modeling approach to settlement determinants and spatial efficiency among late ancestral Pueblo populations of the Mesa Verde region. In T. A. Kohler & G. J. Gumerman (Eds.), Dynamics in human and primate societies: Agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes (pp. 145-178). New York: Oxford University Press.
74.
Lake, M. W. (2000). MAGICAL computer simulation of mesolithic foraging. In T. A. Kohler & G. J. Gumerman (Eds.), Dynamics in human and primate societies: Agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes (pp. 107-143). New York: Oxford University Press.
75.
Lane, R. D., & Nadel, L. (Eds.). (2000). Cognitive neuroscience of emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.
76.
LeDoux, J. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
77.
Little, D. (1998). Microfoundations, method and causation: On the philosophy of the social sciences. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
78.
Lustick, I., & Miodownik, D. (2000). Deliberative democracy and public discourse: The agent-based argument repetoire model. Complexity, 5(4), 13-30.
79.
Maurer, B. A. (1999). Untangling ecological diversity: The macroscopic perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
80.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
81.
Mead, G. H. (1938). The philosophy of the act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
82.
Mead, G. H. (1964). Social consciousness and the consciousness of meaning. In A. J. Reck (Ed.), Selected writings (pp. 123-133). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
83.
Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5(6), 904-913.
84.
Mitchell, W. J. (1990). The logic of architecture: Design, computation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85.
Muller, J. P. (1996). The design of intelligent agents: A layered approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.
86.
Norvig, P. (1996, May). Design patterns in dynamic programming. Paper presented to Object World, San Francisco.
87.
Padgett, J. F. (2000). Closing panel: Results and prospects. In C. M. Macal & D. L. Sallach (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Agent Simulation: Applications, Models and Tools (pp. 259-262). Argonne, IL: Argonne National Laboratory.
88.
Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
89.
Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.
90.
Perry, J. (2000). From worlds to situations. In The problem of the essential indexical and other essays (pp. 125-143). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information.
91.
Pooley, R. J. (1987). An introduction to programming in Simula. Boston: Blackwell.
92.
Regoczei, S. (1987). A constructivist approach to the difficulties of ontological engineering. In A. Farquhar & M. Gruninger (Eds.), Ontological engineering (pp. 108-113). Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence Press.
93.
Rubinstein, A. (1998). Modeling bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
94.
Sallach, D. L. (1988). A comparison of parallel architectures: Neural and social models of mind. In Proceedings of the Second ACM Symposium on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 401-417). Norman: Oklahoma Center for Continuing Education.
95.
Sallach, D. L. (2000). Classical social processes: Attractor and computational models. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 24(4), 245-272.
96.
Sallach, D. L. (2002a, August). Modeling emotional dynamics: Currency versus fields. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Chicago.
97.
Sallach, D. L. (2002b, April). Toward a synthetic theory of social structure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Sociological Society, Milwaukee, WI.
98.
Sargent, T. J. (1993). Bounded rationality in macroeconomics. New York: Oxford University Press.
99.
Sawyer, R. K. (2000). Simulating emergence and downward causation in small groups. In S. Moss & P. Davidsson (Eds.), Multi-agent-based simulation (pp. 49-67). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
100.
Scheff, T. J. (1990). Microsociology: Discourse, emotion and social structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
101.
Scheff, T. J. (1994). Bloody revenge: Emotions, nationalism and war. Lincoln, NE: Authors Guild.
102.
Schillo, M., Fischer K., & Klein, C. T. (2000). The micro-macro link in DAI and sociology. In S. Moss & P. Davidsson (Eds.), Multi-agent-based simulation (pp. 133-148). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
103.
Schulkin, J. (2000). Roots of social sensibility and neural function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
104.
Sen, S., & Weiss, G. (1999). Learning in multiagent systems. In G. Weiss (Ed.), Multiagent systems: A modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence (pp. 259-298). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
105.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
106.
Singh, M. P., Rao, A. S., & Georgeff, M. P. (1999). Formal methods in DAI: Logic-based representation and reasoning. In G. Weiss (Ed.), Multiagent systems: A modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence (pp. 331-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
107.
Sowa, J. F. (2000). Knowledge representation: Logical, philosophical, and computational foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
108.
Sterling, L., & Shapiro, E. (1986). The art of Prolog: Advanced programming techniques. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
109.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (2001). When formality works: Authority and abstraction in law and organizations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
110.
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problems of human-machine communications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
111.
Takaai, M., Takeda, H., & Nishida, T. (1987). Distributed ontology development environment for multi-agent systems. In A. Farquhar & M. Gruninger (Eds.), Ontological engineering (pp. 149-153). Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence Press.
112.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
113.
Thomas, W. I. (1923). The unadjusted girl. Boston: Little, Brown.
114.
Tsebelis, G. (1990). Nested games: Rational choice in comparative politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
115.
Turner, J. H. (2000). On the origins of human emotions: A sociological inquiry into the evolution of human affect. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
116.
Uhr, L. (1987). Multi-computer architectures for artificial intelligence: Toward fast, robust, parallel systems. New York: John Wiley.
117.
Weissman, D. (2000). A social ontology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
118.
White, H. C. (1992). Identity and control: A structural theory of social action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
119.
Wilson, E. O. 1998. Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage.
120.
Winograd, T. (1987). Three responses to situation theory (CSLI Technical Rep. No. CSLI-87-106). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information.
121.
Wolfe, A. (1991). Mind, self, society and computer: Artificial intelligence and the sociology of mind. American Journal of Sociology, 96(5), 1073-1096.
122.
Wooldridge, W., & Jennings, N. R. (1995). Agents theories, architectures and languages: A survey. In W. Wooldridge & N. R. Jennings (Eds.), Intelligent agents (pp. 1-22). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
