The use of intranets and e-mails to communicate with remote staff is increasing rapidly within organizations. Formany companies this is viewed as a speedy and cost-effective way of keeping in contact with staff and ensuring their continuing commitment to company goals. This article highlights the problems experienced by staff when managers use intranets and e-mails in an inappropriate fashion for these purposes. Issues of remoteness and isolation will be discussed, along with the reports of frustration and disidentification experienced. However, it will be shown that when used appropriately, communication using these technologies can facilitate shared understanding and help remote staff to view their company as alive and exciting. Theoretical aspects will be highlighted and the implications of these findings will be discussed.
Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
2.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 30-39.
3.
Belanger, F. (1999). Workers’ propensity to telecommute: An empirical study. Information & Management, 35, 139-153.
4.
Chapman, A. J., Sheehy, N. P., Heywood, S., Dooley, B., & Collins, S. C. (1995). The organizational implications of teleworking. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1151-1185). New York: Wiley.
5.
Daft, L., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
6.
Davenport, T. H., & Pearlson, K. (1998, Summer). Two cheers for the virtual office. Sloan Management Review, 40, 51-65.
7.
DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. (1998). Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10, 693-703.
8.
Duxbury, L., & Neufeld, D. (1999). An empirical evaluation of the impacts of telecommuting on intra-organizational communication. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 16, 1-28.
9.
Ellison, N. B. (1999). Social impacts: New perspectives on telework. Social Science Computer Review, 17(3), 338-356.
10.
Elsbach, K. D. (1999). An expanded model of organizational identification. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 21, 163-200.
11.
El-Shinnaway, M., & Markus, L. (1997). The poverty of media richness theory: Explaining people’s choice of electronic mail vs. voice mail. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 46, 443-467.
12.
Fitzer, M. M. (1997). Managing from afar: Performance and rewards in a telecommuting environment. Compensation and Benefits Review, 29(1), 65-73.
13.
Fulk, J., & DeSanctis, G. (1995). Electronic communication and changing organizational forms. Organizational Science, 6, 337-349.
14.
Handy, C. (1995, May-June). Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 73(3), 40-50.
15.
Kurland, N. B., & Egan, T. D. (1999). Telecommuting: Justice and control in the virtual organization. Organization Science, 10(4), 500-513.
16.
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
O’Mahoney, S., & Barley, S. R. (1999). Do digital telecommunications affect work and organization? The state of our knowledge. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 125-161.
19.
Platt, R. G., & Page, D. (2001). Managing the virtual team: Critical skills and knowledge for successful performance. In N. J. Johnson (Ed.), Telecommuting and virtual offices: Issues and opportunities (pp. 130-147). Hershey, PA: IDEA Group.
20.
Prasad, P. (1993). Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change: A symbolic interactionist study of work computerization. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1400-1429.
21.
Purcell, K., & Purcell, J. (1998). In-sourcing, outsourcing, and the growth of contingent labour as evidence of flexible employment strategies. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7(1), 39-59.
22.
Schmitz, J., & Fulk, J. (1991). Organizational colleagues, information richness, and electronic mail: A test of the social influence model of technology use. Communication Research, 18, 487-523.
23.
Skoldberg, K. (1998). Heidegger and organization: Notes towards a new research programme. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14, 77-102.
24.
Staples, D. S. (2001). Making remote workers effective. In N. J. Johnson (Ed.), Telecommuting and virtual offices: Issues and opportunities (pp. 186-212). Hershey, PA: IDEA Group.
25.
Staples, D. S., Hulland, J. S., & Higgins, C. A. (1998). A self-efficacy theory explanation for the management of remote workers in virtual organizations. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(4). Retrieved from http:www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue4/wiesenfeld.html
26.
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
27.
Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (1999). Managers in a virtual context: The experience of self-threat and its effects on virtual work organizations. Trends in Organizational Behavior, 6, 31-44.
28.
Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (2001). Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. Journal of Management, 27, 213-229.
