The rapid expansion of Internet users has given Web-based surveys the potential to become a powerful tool in survey research. As an application of this technique for gathering data, the International Student Survey was designed to explore factors that might influence choices of college majors and the social support network system among international students at Arizona State University. Cover letters with the links to a Web-based questionnaire were sent through e-mail to the entire international students population. Given that no incentive was offered, this study received a total of 929 completed surveys for an overall response rate of 22% after three waves of solicitations. This article discusses the methodological concerns and problems that arise from using Web surveys, including noncoverage, nonresponse errors, confidentiality concerns, and technical problems. Suggestions for improving response rates also are discussed.
Abrams, M., & Williams, S. (1996, Summer). Complementing surveying and demographics with automated network monitoring. World Wide Web Journal. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.w3j.com/3/s3.abrams.html
2.
Bachmann, D., Elfrink, J., & Vazzana, G. (1996). Tracking the progress of e-mail versus snail-mail. Marketing Research, 8, 31-35.
3.
Batagelj, Z., & Vehovar, V. (1998, May). Technical and methodological issues in WWW surveys. Paper presented at the AAPOR Conference, St. Louis, MO. Retrieved October 2001 from http://surveys.over.net/cl001.html
4.
Boncheck, M. S., Hurwitz, R., & Mallery, J. (1996, Summer). Will the Web democratize or polarize the political process?World Wide Web Journal. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.w3j.com/3/s3.bonchek.html
5.
Brennan, M. S., & Hoek, J. (1992). The behavior of respondents, nonrespondents, and refusers across mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 530-535.
6.
Clarkson, E. (1999, July). Research and the Internet: A winning combination. Quirks Marketing Research Review. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.quirks.com/articles/articleprint.asp?argarticleid=506
7.
Comley, P. (1996, November). The use of the Internet as a data collection method. Paper presented at the World Association of Opinion and Marketing Research Professionals (ESOMAR) Symposium. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.virtualsurveys.com/papers/email.htm
8.
Coomber, R. (1997, June). Using the Internet for survey research: Sociological research online. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/2/2.html
9.
Cude, B. J., & Morganosky, M. (2000). Consumer response to online grocery shopping. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 28, 17-26.
10.
Dillman, D. A. (1991). The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 225-249.
11.
Fox, R. J., Crask, M. R., & Kim, J. (1988). Mail survey response rate: A meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 467-491.
12.
Harkness, D. H., Lindstrom, P. B., Dolson, T. E., Schillmoeller, E. A., & Cook, B. P. (1996, Summer). Nielsen/CommerceNet Internet Demographic Study: Analysis of poststratification weighting procedures. World Wide Web Journal. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.w3j.com/3/s3.harkness.html
13.
Kehoe, C. M., & Pitkow, J. E. (1996, Summer). Surveying the territory: GVU’s five WWW user surveys. World Wide Web Journal. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.w3j.com/3/s3.kehoe.html
14.
Kittleson, M. J. (1995). An assessment of the response rate via the postal service and e-mail. Health Values: The Journal of Health Behavior, Education and Promotion, 19, 27-29.
15.
Mehta, R., & Sivadas, E. (1995). Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, 429-439.
16.
Newburger, E. (2001, September). Home computers and Internet use in the United States: August 2000. Current population reports. U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.census.gov
17.
Paccagnella, L. (1997, June). Getting the seat of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.html
18.
Parker, J. (2001, March). The work lives of scientists: The effects of working conditions and task uncertainty. Paper presented at the Pacific Sociological Association, San Francisco.
19.
Pradhan, K. (1999). The Internet in Nepal: A survey report. The International Information and Library Review, 31, 41-47.
20.
Rachmann, Z. M. (1999). Effective tourism Web sites: A Web-based survey and tourism web sites review. Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia: University of Waikato, School of Management Studies. Retrieved October 2001 from http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/stark/134/tourism/
21.
Sheehan, K., & Grubbs-Hoy, M. (1999, March). Using e-mail to survey Internet users in the United States: Methodology and assessment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue3/
22.
Slevin, J. (1997, October): An integrated approach: Technology firm conducts worldwide satisfaction research survey via e-mail, Internet. Quirk’s Marketing Research Review. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.quirks.com/articles/
23.
Smith, C. B. (1997, June). Casting the net: Surveying an Internet population. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/
24.
Swoboda, W. J., Muehlberger, N., Weitkunat, R., & Schneeweiss, S. (1997). Internet surveys by direct mailing: An innovative way of collecting data. Social Science Computer Review, 15, 242-255.
25.
Tse, A., Tse, K. C., Yin, C. H., Ting, C. B., Yi, K. W., Yee, K. P., & Hong, W. C. (1995). Comparing two methods of sending out questionnaires: Email versus mail. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, 441-445.
26.
U.S. Government Working Group on Electronic Commerce. (2001, January). Third annual report. Leadership for the new millennium: Delivering on digital progress and prosperity. U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.doc.gov/ecommerce
27.
Waskul, D., & Douglas, M. (1997). Cyberself: The emergence of self in on-line chat. The Information Society, 13, 375-396.
28.
Watt, J. H. (1997). Using the Internet for quantitative survey research. Quirk’s Marketing Research Review. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.swiftinteractive.com/White%2520papers/Watt/InternetSurvey.html
29.
Watt, J. H. (1998). Internet-based surveys. Upgrade: The Magazine for the Software and Information Industry Association. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.swiftinteractive.com/White%2520papers/Watt/SIIAarticle.html
30.
Yammarino, F. J., Skinner, S. J., & Childers, T. L. (1991). Understanding mail survey response behavior: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 613-639.
31.
Yun, G. W., & Trumbo, C. W. (2000, September). Comparative response to a survey executed by post, e-mail, and web form. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/
