Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this article, a symbolic version of the Simmel effect has been explored via computer simulation. The Simmel effect refers to the dynamics of status symbols in hierarchically ordered societies. This phenomenon was highlighted by the sociologist Georg Simmel, when he attempted to explain the rapid diffusion and decline of fashion. Simmel hypothesized that the instability of fashion results from the combined action of imitation of higher status members and distinction from those belonging to lower statuses. To test Simmel’s hypothesis, the authors implemented a simulation model: the symbolic Simmel model (SySM), wherein a set of artificial agents hierarchically ordered apply in different combination the rules of imitation and distinction in the common task of sharing symbols. The findings support the view that the Simmel condition allows for a variable or unstable fate of symbols: The success of status symbols starts to decline as soon as they become dominant.

Keywords

status symbols dynamics social hierarchy Simmel effect multiagents computational model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aunger, R. (2000). Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Benvenuto, S. (2000). Dicerie e pettegolezzi. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.

Blackmore, S. (1999). The meme machine. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. London: Allen Lane.

Edmonds, B., & Best, M. (Eds.). (2000). Computational memetics [Special issue]. Journal of Memetics—Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission [Online], 4(2). Available: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit/2001/vol4/index.html

Epstein, J. M. , & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.

Pedone, R. , & Conte, R. (2001). The Simmel effect: Imitation and avoidance in social hierarchies. In S. Moss & P. Davidsson (Eds.), Proceedings of MABS 2000 II International IMACS Workshop on Multi Agent Based Simulation, July 8-9, ICMAS Conference Boston. Berlin: Springer.

10.

Peyton-Young, H. (1998). Individual strategy and social structure: An evolutionary theory of institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

11.

Schelling, T. C. (1971). Models of segregation. American Economist Review, Papers and Proceedings, 59(2), 488-493.

12.

Simmel, G. (1957, May). Fashion. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 541-558. (Original work published 1895)

13.

Walker, A. , & Wooldridge, M. (1995). Understanding the emergence of conventions in multi-agent systems. In V. Lesser (Ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 384-389). Cambridge: MIT Press.

14.

Wooldridge, M. (1999). Intelligent agents. In G. Weiss (Ed.), Multiagent systems: A modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence (pp. 27-78). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Dynamics of Status Symbols and Social Complexity

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References