Barrett, E.A.M. (1984). An empirical investigation of Martha E. Rogers' principle of helicy: The relationship of human field motion and power (Doctoral dissertation, New York University, 1983). University Microfilms No. 84-06, 278.
2.
Barrett, E.A.M. (1986). Investigation of the principle of helicy: The relationship of human field motion and power. In V. Malinski (Ed.), Explorations on Martha Rogers' science of unitary human beings (pp. 173-184). Philadelphia: Davis.
3.
Barrett, E.A.M. (1990). Rogerian patterns of scientific inquiry. In E.A.M. Barrett (Ed.), Visions of Rogers' science-based nursing (pp. 169-187). New York: National League for Nursing.
4.
Butcher, H.K. (1994). The unitary field pattern portrait method: Development of a research method for Rogers' science of unitary human beings. In M. Madrid & E.A.M. Barrett (Eds.), Rogers' scientific art of nursing practice (pp. 397-429). New York: National League for Nursing.
5.
Campbell, D.T. (1979). "Degrees of freedom" and the case study. In T.D. Cook & C.S. Reichardt (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research (pp. 49-67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Carboni, J.T. (1995). A Rogerian process of inquiry. Nursing Science Quarterly, 8, 22-37.
7.
Cooley, W.W. , & Lohnes, P.R. (1971). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Wiley.
8.
Duffy, M.E. (1987). Methdological triangulation: A vehicle for merging quantitative and qualitative research methods. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 19, 130-133.
9.
Dykeman, M.C. , & Loukissa, D. (1993). The science of unitary human beings: An integrative review. Nursing Science Quarterly, 6, 179-188.
10.
Ference, H.M. (1979). The relationship of time experience, creativity traits, differentiation, and human field motion: An empirical investigation of Rogers' correlates of synergistic human development (Doctoral dissertation, New York University, 1979). University Microfilms No. 80-10, 281.
11.
Ference, H.M. (1986). The relationship of time experience, creativity traits, differentiation, and human field motion. In V. Malinski (Ed.), Explorations on Martha Rogers' science of unitary human beings (pp. 95-105). Philadelphia: Davis.
12.
Goodwin, L.D. , & Goodwin, W.L. (1984). Quantitative versus qualitative research or qualitative and quantitative?Nursing Research, 33, 378-380.
13.
Holland, T.R. , Levi, M., & Watson, C.G. (1980). Canonical correlation in the analysis of a contingency table. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 334-336.
14.
Levine, M.S. (1977). Canonical analysis and factor comparison. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
Lincoln, Y.S. , & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
Malinski, V. (1990). The experience of laughing at oneself in older couples. Nursing Science Quarterly, 4, 69-75.
17.
Moccia, P. (1985). A further investigation of "Dialectical thinking as a means of understanding systems-in-development: Relevance to Rogers' principles."Advances in Nursing Science, 7 (4), 33-38.
18.
Munro, B.H. (1986). Canonical correlation and discriminant function analysis. In B. Munro, M. Visintainer, & E. Page (Eds.), Statistical methods for health care research (pp. 320-333). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
19.
Nie, N.H. , Hull, C.H., Jenkins, J.G., Steinbrenner, K., & Bent, D.H. (1975). SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Parse, R.R. (1995). The human becoming theory in research. In R.R Parse (Ed.), Illuminations: The human becoming theory in practice and research (pp. 151-157). New York: National League for Nursing.
21.
Parse, R.R. , Coyne, A.B., & Smith, M.J. (1985). Nursing research traditions: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. In R.R. Parse, A.B. Coyne, & M.J. Smith (Eds.), Nursing research: Qualitative methods (pp. 1-8). Bowie, MD: Brady.
22.
Pedhazur, E.J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research, explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
23.
Porter, E.J. (1989). The qualitative-quantitative dualism. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 21, 98-102.
24.
Reeder, F. (1983). Philosophical issues in the Rogerian science of unitary human beings. Advances in Nursing Science, 5 (5), 14-23.
25.
Reichardt, C.S. , & Cook, T.D. (1979). Beyond qualitative and quantitative methods. In T.D. Cook & C.S. Reichardt (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research (pp. 7-32), Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
Rogers, M.E. (1992). Nursing science and the space age. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 27-34.
27.
Rogers, M.E. (1994a). Nursing science evolves. In M. Madrid & E.A.M. Barret (Eds.), Rogers' scientific art of nursing practice (pp. 3-9). New York: National League for Nursing.
28.
Rogers, M.E. (1994b). The science of unitary human beings: Current perspectives. Nursing Science Quarterly, 7, 33-35.
29.
Wikoff, R.L. , & Miller, P. (1991). Canonical analysis in nursing research, 40, 367-370.
30.
Wilson, I.M. , & Fitzpatrick, J.J. (1984). Dialectical thinking as a means of understanding systems-in-development: Relevance to Rogers' principles. Advances in Nursing Science, 6 (2), 24-41.
