Bangert-Drowns, R.L. (1986). Review of developments in meta-analytic method . Psychological Bulletin,99, 388-399.
2.
Bullock, R.J., & Svyantek, D.J. (1985). Analyzing meta-analysis: Potential problems, an unsuccessful replication, and evaluation criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(1), 108-115.
3.
Cochran, W.G. (1937). Problems arising in the analysis of a series of similar experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society , 4 (Suppl.), 102-118.
4.
Cooper, H.M. (1979). Statistically combining independent studies: A meta-analysis of sex differences in conformity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 131-146.
5.
Cooper, H.M. (1984). The integrative research review: A systematic approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
6.
Fisher, R.A. (1932). Statistical methods for research workers (4th ed.). London: Oliver and Boyd.
7.
Glass, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research . Educational Researcher, 5 (9), 3-8.
8.
Glass, G.V. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research . In L. Sullivan (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 351-379), Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
9.
Glass, G.V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
Hedges, L.V. (1986). Issues in meta-analysis. In E. Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 353-398). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Jackson, G.B. (1980). Methods for integrative reviews. Review of Educational Research. 50, 438-460.
13.
Ketefian, S., & Ormond. I. (1988). Moral reasoning and ethical practice in nursing: An integrative review, (NLN Publication No. 15-2250). New York: National League for Nursing.
14.
Kramer, M.S. (1987). Determinants of low birth weights: Methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 65, 663-737.
15.
L'Abbe, K., Detsky, A., & O'Rourke, K. (1987). Meta-analysis in clinical research. Annals of Internal Medicine, 107, 224-233.
16.
Light, R.J., & Pillemer, D.B. (1982). Numbers and narrative: Combining their strengths in research reviews. Harvard Educational Review, 52(1), 1-26.
17.
Light, R.J., & Pillemer, D.B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pearson, K. (1933). On a method of determining whether a sample of size n supposed to have been drawn from a parent population having a known probability integral has probably been drawn at random. Biometrika , 25, 379-410.
20.
Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic proceduresfor social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Smith, M.C. (1988, October). Meta-analysis: Putting it all together . Paper presented at the Founders' Day Celebration of Nu Chapter, Sigma Theta Tau International, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.
22.
Thacker, S. (1988). Meta-analysis: A quantitative approach to research integration. Journal of the American Medical Association, 259, 1685-1689.
23.
Tippett, L.H.C. (1931). The methods of statistics. London: Williams and Norgate.
24.
Wolf, F.M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .