Rogers’ teaching of changes in her science is briefly presented. Selective ideas of teaching Rogers’ science are discussed. The question “Who is Martha Rogers?” provides the bases to understand Rogers’ pattern manifestations as a person. Changing scientific theoretical ideas support Rogers’ perspective of the paranormal. A call to continue the birthing of Rogers’ science is made.
BarrettE. A. M. (2010). Power as knowing participation in change: What’s new and what’s next. Nursing Science Quarterly, 23(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318409353797
CravenR. H.Sr. (1994). Publisher’s note. In. MalinskiV. M.BarrettE. A. M. (Eds.). Martha E. Rogers: Her life and her work (p. iv). F. A. Davis.
4.
CurrivanJ. (2017). The cosmic hologram: In-formation at the center of creation. Inner Traditions.
5.
FergusonM. (1980). The aquarian conspiracy: Personal and social transformation in the 1980s. J. P. Tarcher.
6.
FrancoeurA. K.FrancoeurR. T. (1974). Hot and cool sex: Cultures in conflict. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
7.
JusticeB. (1998). Being well inside the self: A different measure of health. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 14, 43–73.
8.
LaszloE. (2014). The immortal mind: Science and the continuity of consciousness beyond the brain. Inner Traditions.
9.
MalinskiV. M.BarrettE. A. M. (1994). Martha E. Rogers: Her life and her work. F. A. Davis. Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. (2018). Merriam-Webster.
NerudaP. (1993). Childhood and poetry. In BennettW. J. (Ed.), The book of virtues: A treasury of great moral stories (pp. 339–340). Brentano’s.
12.
PhillipsJ. R. (1990). Changing human potentials and future visions of nursing: A human field image perspective. In BarrettE. A. M. (Ed.), Visions of Rogers’ science-based nursing (pp. 13–25). National League for Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1177/089431849100400403
13.
PhillipsJ. R. (1993). Birth and Rogers’ pandimensional seeds. Visions: The Journal of Rogerian Nursing Science, Premiere Issue, 77–78.
14.
PhillipsJ. R. (1994a). The open-ended nature of the science of unitary human beings. In MadridM.BarrettE. A. M. (Eds.), Rogers’ scientific art of nursing practice (pp. 11–25). New York, National League for Nursing.
15.
PhillipsJ. R. (1994b). Rogers’ contributions to science at large. In MalinskiV. M.BarrettE. A. M. (Eds.), Martha E. Rogers: Her Life and her work (pp. 330–336). F. A. Davis.
16.
PhillipsJ. R. (2010). Perspectives of Rogers’ relative present. Visions: The Journal of Rogerian Nursing Science, 17(1), 8–18.
PhillipsJ. R. (2016). Rogers’ science of unitary human beings: Beyond the frontier of science. Nursing Science Quarterly, 29(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318415615112
