Successful Grant Implementation: How to Avoid the Pitfalls

Abstract

The authors describe the steps that can occur when implementing a funded study. Emphasis is on the administrative formalization of the grant, as well as setting up and implementing the study. This includes hiring personnel, creating study protocols, optimizing recruitment, collecting data with entry, and ensuring study fidelity. In addition, generating formal reports, disseminating findings, and addressing evolving concerns of artificial intelligence are discussed. Finally, the pitfalls to avoid for successful grant implementation are highlighted.

Keywords

funding grants research team science

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

Stringer

McKean

(2024). Ensuring treatment fidelity in intervention studies: Developing a checklist and scoring system within a behaviour change paradigm. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 59(1), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12955

Bennett

L. M.

Gadlin

Marchand

(n.d.). Collaboration and team science: A field guide. NIH National Cancer Institute, NIH Publication No. 18-7660. Accessed September 18, 2024. http://teamscience.nih.gov

Brown

S. A.

Sparapani

Osinski

Zhang

Blessing

Cheng

Hamid

MohamadiPour

M. B.

Lal

J. C.

Kothari

A. N.

Caraballo

Noseworthy

Johnson

R. H.

Hansen

Sun

L. Y.

Crotty

Cheng

Y. C.

Echefu

Doshi

Olson

(2023). Team principles for successful interdisciplinary research teams. American Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and Practice, 32, 100306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100306

Bunning

B. J.

Hedlin

Chen

J. H.

Ciolino

J. D.

Ferstad

J. O.

Fox

Garcia

Johari

Lee

Maahs

D. M.

Mahaffey

K. W.

Opsahl-Ong

Perez

Rochford

Scheinker

Spratt

Turakhia

M. P.

Desai

(2023). The evolving role of data & safety monitoring boards for real-world clinical trials. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 7(1), e179. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.582

Chang

C. N.

Patterson

C. A.

Vanderford

N. L.

Evans

T. M.

(2021). Modeling individual development plans, mentoring support, and career preparedness relationships among doctor of philosophy (Ph.D.) trainees in the life sciences. F1000Research,10, 626. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53705.2

Crane

Comer

R. S.

Arenson

A. D.

Draucker

(2019). Using REDCap to facilitate web-based therapeutic intervention research. Nursing Research, 68(6), 483–487. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000367

Deeter

Hannah

Stroo

Brouwer

Gaudaur

Freel

S. A.

Snyder

D. C.

(2023). Tackling standardization in clinical research workforce hiring using competency-based job classifications. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 7(1), e244. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.672

Garcia

K. K. S.

Abrahão

A. A.

(2021). Research development using REDCap software. Healthcare Informatics Research, 27(4), 341-349. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2021.27.4.341

Ghamgosar

Nemati-Anaraki

Panahi

(2023). Barriers and facilitators of conducting research with team science approach: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 638. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04619-0. Erratum in: BMC Med Educ., 2023 Sep 29;23(1):715. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04705-3

10.

Gupta

Huang

Diaz

Gore

Levy

Bergman

Tanner

Sherman

S. E.

Islam

Schwartz

M. D.

(2023). Implementation fidelity to a behavioral diabetes prevention intervention in two New York City safety net primary care practices. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 575. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15477-2

11.

Hitch

(2024). Artificial intelligence augmented qualitative analysis: The way of the future? Qualitative Health Research, 34(7), 595-606. https://projectredcap.org/ https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323231217392

12.

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). (2024). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. https://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf

13.

Jeske

Vasquez

Fullerton

S. M.

Saperstein

Bentz

Foti

Shim

J. K.

Lee

S. S.

(2022). Beyond inclusion: Enacting team equity in precision medicine research. PLoS One, 17(2), e0263750. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263750

14.

National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2017, January 18). NIH policy on dissemination of NIH-funded clinical trial information. https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/clinical-trials/reporting/nih-policy

15.

Penckofer

Byrn

Mumby

Ferrans

(2011). Improving subject recruitment, retention, and participation in research through Peplau’s theory of interpersonal relations. Nursing Science Quarterly, 24(2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318411399454

16.

Penckofer

Martyn-Nemeth

(2024). The steps and challenges in preparing a grant application. Nursing Science Quarterly, 37(4), 312-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184241269955

17.

Peskoe

Slade

Rende

Boulos

Desai

Gandhi

Gelfond

J.A.L.

Khalatbari

Schulte

P. J.

Snyder

D. C.

Taylor

S. L.

Troy

J. D.

Vaughan

Pomann

G. M.

(2024). Methods for building a staff workforce of quantitative scientists in academic health care. Stat (International Statistic Institute), 13(2), e683. https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.683

18.

Pigott

H. E.

Kim

Kirsch

Amsterdam

(2023). What are the treatment remission, response and extent of improvement rates after up to four trials of antidepressant therapies in real-world depressed patients? A reanalysis of the STAR*D study’s patient-level data with fidelity to the original research protocol. BMJ Open, 13(7), e063095. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063095

19.

Reagan

Nowlin

S. Y.

Birdsall

S. B.

Gabbay

Vorderstrasse

Johnson

D’Eramo Melkus

(2019). Integrative review of recruitment of research participants through Facebook. Nursing Research, 68(6), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000385

20.

Rookes

T. A.

Schrag

Walters

Armstrong

(2022). Measures of fidelity of delivery and engagement in self-management interventions: A systematic review of measures. Clinical Trials (London, England), 19(6), 665–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745221118555

21.

Savard

Kilpatrick

(2022). Tailoring research recruitment strategies to survey harder-to-reach populations: A discussion paper. Journal of Advance Nursing, 78(4), 968–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15156

22.

Sweeney

(2002). K-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy. International Journal on Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems, 10(5), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488502001648

23.

Thomas

S. M.

Jung

Sun

Psioda

M. A.

Quibrera

P. M.

Strakowski

S. M.

(2020). Enhancing clarity of clinical trial safety reports for data monitoring committees. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 30(6), 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2020.1815934

24.

Toly

V. B.

Eliades

Miller

Sidora

Kracker

Fiala

AlShammari

(2022). Collaborative development of an innovative virtual research recruitment strategy through an academic/clinical partnership. Applied Nursing Research, 68, 151626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151626

25.

Tsaltskan

Sanchez Baez

Firestein

G. S.

(2023). Cost-effectiveness of social media advertising as a recruitment tool: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Translational Science, 7(1), e180. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.596

26.

Webber-Ritchey

K. J.

Aquino

Ponder

T. N.

Lattner

Soco

Spurlark

Simonovich

S. D.

(2021). Recruitment strategies to optimize participation by diverse populations. Nursing Science Quarterly, 34(3), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184211010471. PMID: 34212805.

27.

Zahren

Harvey

Weekes

Bradshaw

Butala

Andrews

O’Callaghan

. (2021). Clinical trials site recruitment optimisation: Guidance from clinical trials: Impact and quality. Clinical Trials (London, England), 18(5), 594–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745211015924

28.

Zahrieh

Croghan

I. T.

Inselman

J. W.

Mandrekar

S. J.

(2023). Guidelines for data and safety monitoring in pragmatic randomized clinical trials using case studies. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 98(11), 1712–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.02.019