Although many situation-specific theories have been developed during the past several years, few of them have been analyzed and evaluated using criteria that are relevant for this type of theory. The purpose of this paper is to propose modifications in Fawcett’s analysis and evaluation criteria of theories for application to situation-specific theories. The position taken is that important but minor adjustments are required to make these criteria suitable for the analysis and evaluation of situation-specific theories, taking the similarities and differences between middle-range theories and situation-specific theories into account.
FawcettJ. (2024). More thoughts about the evolution of the metaparadigm of nursing: Addition of culture as another metaparadigm concept and definitions of all the concepts. Nursing Science Quarterly, 37(2), 183–184. doi: 10.1177/08943184231224409
2.
FawcettJ.DeSanto MadeyaS. (2013). Contemporary nursing knowledge: Analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories (3rd ed.). F.A. Davis.
3.
FawcettJ.GarityJ. (2009). Evaluating research for evidence-based practice. F.A. Davis.
ImE. O. (2021). The current status of theory evaluation in nursing. In ImE. O.MeleisA. I. (Eds.), Situation-specific theories: Development, utilization, and evaluation in nursing (pp. 323–337). Springer.
6.
ImE.-O.MeleisA. I. (1999). Situation-specific theories: philosophical roots, properties, and approach. Advances in Nursing Science, 22(2), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-199912000-00003.
7.
ImE. O.MeleisA. I. (2021). Situation-specific theories: Development, utilization, and evaluation in nursing. Springer.
8.
MeleisA. I. (2012). Theoretical nursing: Development and progress (5th ed.). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
9.
MeleisA. I. (2017). Theoretical nursing: Development and progress (6th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
