The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of motivational interviewing as based on Pender’s health promotion model (HPM) on diabetes self-management behavior among individuals with Type 2 diabetes. Apart from their routine care, the individuals in the intervention group were given a 30–45-minute motivational interview based on Pender’s HPM once a week for three months. Statistically significant differences were determined between the groups in the total score of the scales and its sub-dimensions (p < .05). The intervention applied in the present study can be used as an effective and easy method through which to develop and maintain diabetes self-management behaviors.
Al KsirK.WoodD. L.HasniY.SahliJ.QuinnM.GhardallouM. (2022). Motivational interviewing to improve self-management in youth with Type 1 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 66, 116-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2022.05.001
2.
Cepeda MarteJ. L.Ruiz-MatukC.MotaM.PérezS.RecioN.HernándezD.FernándezJ.PortoJ.RamosA. (2019). Quality of life and metabolic control in Type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed individuals. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews, 5, 2827-2832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2019.07.062
3.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
CradockK. A.ÓLaighinG.FinucaneF. M.GainforthH. L.QuinlanL. R.GinisK. A. M. (2017). Behaviour change techniques targeting both diet and physical activity in Type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0436-0
5.
Dehghan-NayeriN.GhaffariF.SadeghiT.MozaffariN. (2018). Effects of motivational interviewing on adherence to treatment regimens among patients with Type 1 diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Spectrum, 32(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.2337/ds18-0038
6.
EkongG.KavookjianJ. (2016). Motivational interviewing and outcomes in adults with Type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 99(6), 944-952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.022
7.
EsinN. (1999). Adaptation of healthy lifestyle behaviours scale for Turkey. Nursing Bulletin, 12(45), 87-95.
8.
HarveyJ. N. (2015). Psychosocial interventions for the diabetic patient. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, 8, 29-43. https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S44352
9.
KaraM.BijlJ. J.va. derM.Shortridge-BaggettL.AştiT.ErgüneyS. (2006). Cross-cultural adaptation of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: Scale development. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43, 611-621.
10.
LestariS. P.WihastutiT. A.DewiD.LestariS. (2022). Effects of motivational interviewing on the self-efficacy of Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 16(1), 1111-1117. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v16i1.17644
11.
LiZ.ChenQ.YanJ.LiangW.WongW. C. (2020). Impact of motivational interviewing on self-management in patients with Type 2 diabetes: Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Services Research, 20(57), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.2196/15709
McDanielC. C.KavookjianJ.WhitleyH. P. (2022). Telehealth delivery of motivational interviewing for diabetes management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Patient Education and Counseling, 105(4), 805-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.036
14.
MoshkiM.MohammadipourF.GholamiM.HeydariF.BayatM. (2022). The evaluation of an educational intervention based on Pender’s health promotion model for patients with myocardial infarction. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 60(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2020.1816487
15.
MusluL.ArdahanM.Gunbayiİ. (2022). The effect of the motivational interview program on coping and adaptation of patients with Type 2 diabetes: An action research study. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, 6(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.930592
16.
PridhamK. F.GeorgeJ. B. (1986). Nursing theories: The base for professional nursing practice. American Journal of Nursing, 86(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/3425023
17.
RamadanR. M. E.MohammedL.AliG. (2019). The efficacy of motivational interviewing on glycemic control for patients with diabetes. 6(1), 706-718.
18.
RenY.LiM. (2022). Intervention effect of Pender’s model on mental health of patients with diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 47(1), P94-P101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2022.05.001
19.
VakilianP.MahmoudiM.OskouieF.Asghar FirouzianA.KhachianA. (2021). Investigating the effect of educational intervention based on the Pender’s health promotion model on lifestyle and self‑efficacy of the patients with diabetic foot ulcer: A clinical trial. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10, 466. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1301_20
20.
Van der BijlJ. J.Van Poelgeest-EeltinkA.Shortridge-BaggettL. (1999). The psychometric properties of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(2), 352-359. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01077.x
21.
WalkerS. N.SechristK. R.PenderN. J. (1987). The health promoting lifestyle profile: Development and psychometric characteristics. Nursing Research, 36(2), 76-81.
